Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: loosecanon
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 80 next>>
Oct 2, 2018 01:15:46   #
The 3rd and 9th ones are especially good
Go to
Sep 30, 2018 04:03:39   #
A beautiful, evocative photo.
Go to
Sep 30, 2018 00:31:04   #
Very cool. As a kid I used to love a film called, I think, "The Flying Tigers."
Go to
Sep 29, 2018 15:07:18   #
MT Shooter wrote:
I already own a D500, D800E, and D850 that will be making the trip. The whole point of the Z's is to do long term side x side comparisons.


That, I understand.
Go to
Sep 29, 2018 14:57:59   #
CatMarley wrote:
Like I have been saying right along, there are going to be very few reasons to buy a DSLR after these babies start coming out!


I'm not quite sure I understand. Wht not any dslrs? Is there anything inherently superior about the theory and execution of mirrorless over equivalent-spected dslrs? What is the difference in the final photo? Will we be able to spot the difference when we see a good photo?
Go to
Sep 29, 2018 00:52:43   #
I agree: borderless is better. With a border you're looking through a window. Without a border you're there.
Go to
Sep 28, 2018 11:34:28   #
loosecanon wrote:
Welcome from a nearby neighbor.


I forgot to add that these are excellent photos.
Go to
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Sep 28, 2018 11:33:20   #
Welcome from a nearby neighbor.
Go to
Sep 28, 2018 04:26:13   #
Very evocative. Nice job.
Go to
Sep 27, 2018 11:34:21   #
All I can say is that the Canon 100-400 is simply incredible in every way.
Go to
Sep 27, 2018 09:51:27   #
That is by far THE greatest dog picture I've ever seen. What a fine and noble beast she is, and what a beautifully artistic and technical job you've done.
Go to
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Sep 26, 2018 11:23:50   #
Gene51 wrote:
I think an illustration of what I am talking about, from a photographic point of view, will better explain what I was saying, with respect to the image. I am not saying your wife is incorrect. Of course the rider must look to the next jump, but for a split second, the rider and horse are unison, looking to stick the landing. Does she compete in Grand Prix?

The following images were taken from at Westport, CT, Ox Ridge Hunt Club Grand Prix in 2015.


I see your point perfectly. Wonderful and clear examples.
Go to
Sep 26, 2018 01:09:36   #
Gene51 wrote:
The answer to your question is a resounding YES!!!

BTW, you were late on the first shot - the forelegs should be tucked under the chest, ears forward and but rider and ride fully concentrating and anticipating the landing. I'm just being fussy, with a little chain yanking tossed in. Excellent article and illustrations.

I might add that I agree 100% with the proof nature of Lightroom and ACR. People who "get by" with no further editing are often, as I like to say, "leaving money on the table". They stop short of a truly finished image, perhaps because they are ok with the results. I look at a lot of Lightroom-only images and see so much unrealized potential. But then again, many are just doing post processing for themselves and tend to be less critical than a creative director or gallery owner/manager - where all aspects, including the small, often overlooked details, matter. There clearly is a world of difference between the hobbyist/enthusiast and the working successful pro - and it can be found in the details and small stuff.
The answer to your question is a resounding YES!!!... (show quote)


My wife, a rider, says that you are incorrect about the rider's position. She MUST look toward and ready be anticipating the next jump in order for the horse to position itself correctly upon landing. She feels it is precisely that turned, antipatorial stance that gives the shot character.
Go to
Sep 25, 2018 15:22:46   #
Over my head but beautifully explained--with clear examples. You're a good teacher.
Go to
Sep 25, 2018 14:57:42   #
sirlensalot wrote:
Wedding photographers are walking billboards whether dressed in black or not. If they choose to advertise their business wearing wrinkled shirts and jeans, that's up to them. For those here that think it's an "old" thing, your display of bias is appalling. Photographers are there for the bride and groom, not themselves.


Thank you.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 80 next>>
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.