Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Dan De Lion
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 42 next>>
Jun 22, 2017 15:24:00   #
asiafish wrote:
DxO, DxO, spec sheet, spec sheet, blah blah blah.


-----

A boobie with his head in the sand.

For all those M boobies. Here'€™s what I think a good B&W looks like. This is one of a 5 pic limited addition portfolio I'€™m currently working on called '€"Rock and Ice." The NEF was taken in Glacier Bay in 2013. This is a low res. copy (1.9mb) of the 125mb file and is copywrited. The complete portfolio of 5 archival signed 17x35s will sell for $5000. Rock and Ice 1 was taken with a Nikon D600 and a 24-120 f4 in 2013. It is best viewed on a profiled monitor using PhotoShop.


Go to
Jun 22, 2017 13:47:58   #
selmslie wrote:
I have made it very clear that color Leica images are excellent, competitive, but no better than what I can get from my D610. The Leica color images are just as god or better than my A7 II.

Although I can't afford one, friends of mine have Monochrom cameras and they indeed are special. Even the 18 MP version is better than a D810. I don't own a D810 either.

However you are in no position to judge any Leica digital camera since you have never used one and have only read about them. You have never seen what they can do.

Neither has anyone here seen what you can do. See Where do I Create a Small Gallery? where you said, "This gallery will hopefully add authenticity to my posts."

So until you actually show us what you can do you are coming across as a negative, embittered troll. You enjoy expressing your contempt for the knowledge and skill of your fellow members but your own knowledge is questionable at best. It all seems to be based on Internet research rather than your own personal experience.

It's really time you grew up.
I have made it very clear that color Leica images ... (show quote)


-----

Typical delusional Leica owner. Second class cameras owned by second class photographers. These are the clowns that bought the most expensive camera because it was most expensive and now claim some gift of enhanced vision that "proves" that Leica images are special. You don't have to believe me that Leicas are second class. Just look at the specs, the reviews, and the DxO ratings.

A special note for selmslie - why do you think I'd give-a-damn about what a delusional amateur thinks of my pics?

-----
Go to
Jun 22, 2017 11:34:37   #
asiafish wrote:
An interesting question as the Leica Monochrom has never had a red dot. It doesn't have any branding on the body except for the word Monochrom and the serial number on the hotshoe and "Leica Camera Wetzlar" on the back, and even those are very hard to see as they are merely engraving with no paint, under the same black chrome as the rest of the camera.

No dot to cover.


-----

Let's get down to basics with a guessing game. There follows a list of camera specs. You have to guess what camera possesses them. Is it a 5 year old Canon/Nikon entry camera, currently selling used for $200 or is it a brand new Leica M selling for $7950?

2FPS
18 mp
10,000 max ISO
sRGB profile - no Adobe
no image stabilization
no auto focus
2.5 screen - no movement
1/4000 top shutter speed

Can you believe that Leica partisans boast about their M's?

-----
Go to
Jun 22, 2017 11:15:17   #
selmslie wrote:
You are suffering from an inferiority complex of mammoth proportions - a serious case of Leica envy. Why should it matter to you how much someone pays for a camera?

You clearly know nothing about rangefinder cameras or the Leica Monochrom and its unique advantage from having no Bayer array. There are other cameras that do not have the Bayer disadvantage but the Monochrom is the only B&W version. You just can't think out of your DSLR box.

You are also blissfully unaware of the advantages of larger formats and film that are capable of greater resolution and performance than any 24x36 mm sensor.

Are you still buying gray market stuff from 42nd Street? The one thing that we can be sure of is that, when you are posting, we are dealing 100% of the time with an uninformed dummy.
You are suffering from an inferiority complex of m... (show quote)


-----

Talk about inferiority complexes. What do you call someone who stupidly buys a second rate camera at an extraordinary price, and then boasts about it? A fool and his money...

Read my tag line. That's why I correct neophytes who foolishly boast about their uninformed purchases.

Go ahead and use your overpriced, underperforming Leicas. You'll get acceptable results. They aren't bad cameras, they're just not particularly good. Try to get over the crap that Leica images are special and that monochrome cameras take better pics.


-----
Go to
Jun 21, 2017 23:55:49   #
bylinecl wrote:
Holy Halibut, for a few posts I was reminded of when I’d wandered into a pub in an English village, wearing a green pullover sweater. Only to discover that this particular shade of green was the team color of the neighboring shire's football (soccer team). I had to remove the “jumper" as the Brits call them, before being served. Nevertheless there was a good deal of stink-eye sent my way by individuals who were convinced I was either a provocateur or some sort of soccer spy.

Please understand that I was unaware of the existing sub-cutaneous vein of brand-partisanship and ire that my simple question seeking anyone's experience, intel, or insight using the Leica Monochrom would invoke. Certain remarks suggested a level of economic envy, and what read like bitter disdain disparaging anyone who would even consider paying thousands of dollars for a technologically minimal camera that had such an apparently limited scope.

So, please let me apologize. I’ve stayed alive by avoiding walking into mine fields. Somehow, I missed this one.

I was simply asking for some insight and intel under the presumption that the members of this forum are more skilled photographers and much more competent post-processors than I am, or can ever hope to be. And I’m grateful for how much I’ve learned, thanks to your collectively sharing that knowledge.

Even, Mr. Dan, if it comes as a backhand slap, a teaching’s a teaching. Thank you, sir.

Again, please understand I make no claim to be a “photographer." I’m just a writer who's happened to have a camera on certain occasions under uncertain circumstances and eked out a living with words and pictures as a result. My sole claim to photographic technique comes from either reading (or guessing) my exposures from chimping the inside of a flattened out Tri-X Kodak box I kept in my shirt pocket.

Well, we all know that world's long gone. I'm staggering around suffering from Post-Traumatic Digital Dyslexia. I can develop film in Belsonal and canteen water, but have failed at turning color convincingly into B&W and thus sought solace with simplicity, i.e., the Leica Monochrom.

So, I’m not always well-informed and selective. I'm an "…f8 and be there" guy who used any camera I've happened to have with me--that I can figure out how to use. Most of which, Nikon, Canon, Leica, Contax, Rollie, etc. I’ve picked up second-hand, or got cheap when a guy with a lot of knowledge and a lot of cameras couldn't pay his bar tab, got scared, got Malaria or Dengue, got wounded, was threatened with divorce and bailed out.

As to paying thousands of dollars for a camera with a good combat reputation? Dude, life's pitifully short. Get the big fries.
Holy Halibut, for a few posts I was reminded of wh... (show quote)


-----

With Leica you don't get the fresh big fries, dude, you get yesterday fries at way to high a price.

Leica appeals to two types of photographers. First, collectors who want a souvenir of past glory days. Second, to fools who buy the most expensive camera hoping it will show the size of their bank account and good taste.

Note how these Leica boobies always assume that anyone who could afford a Leica would have one. And to not have a Leica is an indication of poverty and ignorance. These opinions are held by clowns who bought second rate technology at eye watering prices. They invariably see special attributes in Leica pictures that no one else sees.

Just remember, 90% of the time when you meet someone with a Leica you're dealing with a dummy.

-----
Go to
Jun 21, 2017 12:55:10   #
rafikiphoto wrote:
For anybody who wants it, I have found the ignore list. PM me if you need directions....


-----

Another demo of Leica owner's ignorance. That option has been available on UHH forever. The Leica boobies have to have their SAFE SPACES. They hate being confused by the facts.

-----
Go to
Jun 21, 2017 12:00:43   #
rafikiphoto wrote:
YAWN! Give it a rest pal. You are boring. Correction: Really boring!


-----

Another Leica boobie pops up.

-----
Go to
Jun 21, 2017 11:15:51   #
selmslie wrote:
...

But for B&W there is nothing that comes close to a Monochrom and nobody has ever been able to match Leica's quality and durability in the rangefinder arena - not Nikon, Canon or anyone else...


-----

There's no reasoning with Leica boobies! But, how do they reconcile Leica's "pealing sensor" disaster and constant firmware changes with their Leica BELIEVES?

-----
Go to
Jun 20, 2017 20:35:22   #
selmslie wrote:
You sound a bit jealous.

Too bad you don't know enough about photography to understand the charm of anything outside of your tiny DSLR world.

Photography does not rise and set on DSLR. It's the other way round.


-----

Any boobie who believes Leica still makes the definitive camera, is the fellow I'd gladly put my photographic knowledge up against. Want to try?

-----

,
Go to
Jun 20, 2017 20:27:17   #
asiafish wrote:
So sorry you lack the money to afford, and the taste to appreciate one. Oh well, you have DxO and their resolution charts.


-----

You know what they say, a Leica fool and his money are soon parted. Did you wave goodbye.

-----
Go to
Jun 20, 2017 19:57:59   #
asiafish wrote:
Yeah, I've noticed that. I wish UHH had a "block" function like FaceBook.


-----

Ah, the poor little Leica owners need a safe space. - You know you could always go to a Leica partisan site. There you can be safe while inspiring each other with tales of the real, but inexplicable, greatness of Leica images. Just imagine the "rendering" and "smoothness" stories that will send other Leica owners into spasms of self-congratulatory adulation. At such a site you'd never have to read that you bought a second rate camera at a truly extraordinary price. You'd be safe!

-----
Go to
Jun 20, 2017 18:18:05   #
asiafish wrote:
Well I do believe in Leica. I own a few, and they are quite real.

As for when a person stops believing in religion, well, I never started. I don't need to get a worldview from a silly book written by superstitious Judean shepherds that didn't know where the sun goes at night. You are welcome to believe that silliness all you want though.


-----

Hey Fish - Talk about silliness and ignorance. The sun doesn't go anywhere at night. - The earth turns and the sun does not go around the earth. That's the kind of basic scientific mistake that people , such as Lieca partisans, make. Nor does the sun rise or set. Given your believes in the sun, in religion, and in Leica, I'd guess you are also complete believer in global warming. Am I wrong?

-----
Go to
Jun 20, 2017 18:02:08   #
[quote=amfoto1]It's not quite what you're looking for... but how about a Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM 1.4X.... built-in, matched 1.4X teleconverter makes it a 280-560mm f/5.6 with the flip of a lever. Only $11,000

You want FAST? Well there's the Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8.... only 35 lb. and $26,000.

https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/w/TS560x560?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftambnguyen.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F04%2F01b151c88da08ddc655c0210.L.jpg&signature=PcYbTFKVguesW%2FRuoKNSn1LnUFQ%3D

-----

Is that little dot at the end of the lens a D5?

-----
Go to
Jun 20, 2017 17:27:06   #
jessie2004 wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has had any experience using third party batteries in a Canon D77?
I have read many discussions on this topic here. I was convinced that I was going to buy a Wasabi extra battery. Then I went online to purchase and saw many negative reviews from people using in a D77. I hate the thoughts of spending the money on a Canon battery however I also don't want to ruin my camera.
Thank you very much for any help.


-----

Ask yourself: "Am I feeling lucky." You spent a lot of money for the camera, why go cheap when getting cards or batteries. My experience is that third party batteries and off brand cards fail much, much more often. Your only going to buy a good extra battery once. Why not get one that you know will work with your camera now and in the future?

-----
Go to
Jun 20, 2017 17:15:01   #
asiafish wrote:
Bullshit. The Leica works just fine. I (and many others) get plenty of jobs done with Leica cameras all the time.

Maybe YOU can't get good results from a Leica, but that only suggests your dependency on having a camera that thinks for you.


-----

Fish says: "A man without religion is like a fish without a bicycle."

Obviously Fish has forgotten that: "When a person stops believing in religion, they don't believe in nothing - they believe in anything." In Fish's case, he believes in Leica.

-----
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 42 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.