bylinecl wrote:
Holy Halibut, for a few posts I was reminded of when I’d wandered into a pub in an English village, wearing a green pullover sweater. Only to discover that this particular shade of green was the team color of the neighboring shire's football (soccer team). I had to remove the “jumper" as the Brits call them, before being served. Nevertheless there was a good deal of stink-eye sent my way by individuals who were convinced I was either a provocateur or some sort of soccer spy.
Please understand that I was unaware of the existing sub-cutaneous vein of brand-partisanship and ire that my simple question seeking anyone's experience, intel, or insight using the Leica Monochrom would invoke. Certain remarks suggested a level of economic envy, and what read like bitter disdain disparaging anyone who would even consider paying thousands of dollars for a technologically minimal camera that had such an apparently limited scope.
So, please let me apologize. I’ve stayed alive by avoiding walking into mine fields. Somehow, I missed this one.
I was simply asking for some insight and intel under the presumption that the members of this forum are more skilled photographers and much more competent post-processors than I am, or can ever hope to be. And I’m grateful for how much I’ve learned, thanks to your collectively sharing that knowledge.
Even, Mr. Dan, if it comes as a backhand slap, a teaching’s a teaching. Thank you, sir.
Again, please understand I make no claim to be a “photographer." I’m just a writer who's happened to have a camera on certain occasions under uncertain circumstances and eked out a living with words and pictures as a result. My sole claim to photographic technique comes from either reading (or guessing) my exposures from chimping the inside of a flattened out Tri-X Kodak box I kept in my shirt pocket.
Well, we all know that world's long gone. I'm staggering around suffering from Post-Traumatic Digital Dyslexia. I can develop film in Belsonal and canteen water, but have failed at turning color convincingly into B&W and thus sought solace with simplicity, i.e., the Leica Monochrom.
So, I’m not always well-informed and selective. I'm an "…f8 and be there" guy who used any camera I've happened to have with me--that I can figure out how to use. Most of which, Nikon, Canon, Leica, Contax, Rollie, etc. I’ve picked up second-hand, or got cheap when a guy with a lot of knowledge and a lot of cameras couldn't pay his bar tab, got scared, got Malaria or Dengue, got wounded, was threatened with divorce and bailed out.
As to paying thousands of dollars for a camera with a good combat reputation? Dude, life's pitifully short. Get the big fries.
Holy Halibut, for a few posts I was reminded of wh... (
show quote)
With Leica you don't get the fresh big fries, dude, you get yesterday fries at way to high a price.
Leica appeals to two types of photographers. First, collectors who want a souvenir of past glory days. Second, to fools who buy the most expensive camera hoping it will show the size of their bank account and good taste.
Note how these Leica boobies always assume that anyone who could afford a Leica would have one. And to not have a Leica is an indication of poverty and ignorance. These opinions are held by clowns who bought second rate technology at eye watering prices. They invariably see special attributes in Leica pictures that no one else sees.
Just remember, 90% of the time when you meet someone with a Leica you're dealing with a dummy.