Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Posts for: Jerrin1
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 44 next>>
Oct 23, 2019 11:03:21   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Sony Sensor Dust
StevenG wrote:
I read some reviews of the A7iii when it first came out indicating that sensor dust was an issue, as it is on most mirrorless cameras. Now I just watched a Tony Northrop video of the A7Riv, where he says sensor dust on the Sony is more prevalent than on most mirrorless cameras. And, he gets dust at the end of the day even if he doesn’t change lenses. I would like to know what other Sony owners think. And, if this is a problem, how often do you clean the sensor? Thanks.


Until a month ago I owned a Sony A9 and a Sony A7III and had no issues with dust. I shots a few thousand images with both and cleaned the sensors only once. I now own a Sony A7R4. I have been using it for about a month, changed lenses in windy, dusty weather over a dozen times and have yet to find any traces of dust on my sensor. I watched Tony Northrup's video and could not believe he was suggesting the sensor on his A7R4 gathered dust even when then lens was in place. I found his statement incredulous.
Go to
Oct 21, 2019 06:30:19   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
One Camera Only
Bill 45 wrote:
A take off on the question "Your Favorite Camera" You can only have one camera, you can all the lenses you want to go with that camera. Money is no problem. Remember this camera is the only one you can have for the rest of your life. Something happens to the camera, no replacement.


After 30 years of using two cameras in tandem I now only own one - a Sony A7R4. This camera is so versatile I doubt I will go back to owning two cameras. If I do, the second will probably be another A7R4, though an A9II would be tempting.
Go to
Oct 21, 2019 06:26:50   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Your Favorite Camera
JD750 wrote:
I have and still own various cameras. I use different cameras for different things. But I have a favorite. One that is my go to carry it with me everyday. I like the results I get from it SOOC, I love the color, I like the way it works, and I like the way it feels and handles. And it has one hot pixel. Arrrrrgggggg. 😡 But it is still my favorite camera.

So this post is not about what camera is best or most expensive or mine is better than yours, or DSLR vs Mirrorless, or brand loyalty. It's about what camera is your favorite camera, and lens, and why.

Mine is my Olympus OM-D EM5 Mii + 14-45 Panasonic Lens.

What is yours?
I have and still own various cameras. I use differ... (show quote)


Sony A7R4: but I still have fond memories of my Olympus EM1 mark II (and Sony A9)
Go to
Oct 20, 2019 05:40:55   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Sony Alpha 7R IV Versus Sony Alpha 9 for Wildlife
Jacqui Burke wrote:
I recently purchased the Sony A7R IV and the new Sony 200-600 mm lens from B&H with the purpose of shooting wildlife. Previously I used a Nikon D7100 and a Nikon D7200 with the first generation Tamron 150-600 lens. The lens began to become a bit "glitchy" and both DSLRs had many clicks on them, so I decided to succumb to the GAS attack and buy the Sony system.

I am finding that the new Sony camera can take excellent photos, however, there is a large amount of noise in low light situations, even with ISOs well within the range at which my DSLR system performed well. I have been researching a lot over the past few days and feel that perhaps I should have purchased the Alpha 9 instead. Apparently, the high resolution of the A7R IV leads to more noise. The camera also requires a high shutter speed because the high resolution magnifies movement, but then with the high shutter speed comes the excessive noise. Most of the reviews online indicate that the A7R IV is best for landscapes and product photos as it will be used on a tripod with low shutter speeds, and the Alpha 9 is better for wildlife as it has a superior low light performance and a faster autofocus system. Obviously low light performance is critical for wildlife as animals are most active at dawn and dusk, and a high shutter speed is necessary to arrest movement.

I am still within the 30 day window (barely!) to return the A7R IV to B&H, and the Alpha 9 is exactly the same price now, so it would be an even trade. I really want to make the right decision on this as a lot of money is involved and I won't be able to afford to upgrade again for at least five more years. After having tried the Sony for a short time, however, I am definitely committed to a mirrorless camera. I love the electronic viewfinder and I love the zoom ring on the 200-600 lens; it is so easy to zoom in while maintaining the focus box on the subject.

Thanks in advance for your help with this!
I recently purchased the Sony A7R IV and the new S... (show quote)


I shoot wildlife exclusively and part exchanged my A9 and A7III for an A7R4 and have not looked back. If you require fantastically fast and accurate AF along with blisteringly high fps, then the A9 is the camera for you. If you are continually shooting in low light the A7III offers a better solution. I, on the other hand, realised the 61MP, which provides for better cropping, coupled with the better AF the A7R4 offers over the A7III, made the A7R4 a better camera for me. I have no issues with the noise at higher ISO, I have shot up to ISO 4000 and taken care of the noise in LR. Generally, I rarely shoot at higher than ISO 2000 - even with my 200 - 600mm. I may purchase Tapaz Denoise at some point, but at the moment do not feel the need. You may care to check out Mark Smith's YouTube channel, he uses both the A9 and A7R4 extensively. He also released a video showing the value of Topaz.
Go to
Oct 15, 2019 05:58:59   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Carrying big lenses
cliodiver wrote:
Looking at buying Nikon 200-500 lens that weighs 5lbs. That on my d850 will be quite a load. Are there any suggestions of how to carry this load afield? I will be using monopod/tripod for photos.


For the past 5 years I have used a Cotton Carrier twin (now have the G3 version) to carry my two camera bodies and lenses. I walk up to 15 miles/7 hours a day and can think of no better way to carry my gear. I can even run without fear of my cameras becoming detached; but simply turning them through 90 degrees allows them to be brought into action very quickly. In the past I have carried a Canon 300mm f2.8L IS, a Nikkor 200 - 500mm f5.6 and now a Sony 200 - 600mm without issue. Cotton Carriers do not come cheap, but they are the biz. I did own a cheap Chinese knock - off and it was pretty good: but Cotton Carrier is a quality product with a 3 year guarantee.
Go to
Oct 7, 2019 10:18:56   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Olympus OMD EM 1 Mark 2
Rockyw wrote:
Am considering buying an Olympus OMD EM 1 MK 2 camera, ant issues with these ?


Though I sold mine and moved to Sony, I have to say the EM1 mark II is still one of the best cameras I have ever owned. In fact, I preferred it to my Nikon D500, which I used in tandem for wildlife photography.
Go to
Oct 5, 2019 06:53:12   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Sony A9 II Announced
quixdraw wrote:
Even if I wasn't completely satisfied with my current camera systems, the trumpeting of the Sony Fan Boys would be enough to prevent consideration of the system.


I take it that your use of the term "Sony Fan Boys" is meant to be insulting. You obviously have great difficulty in accepting any views or opinions other than your own.
Go to
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 17, 2019 05:21:49   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Oh Where Oh Where Can A Nikon 500mm PF 5.6 Lens Be?
Kandfoto wrote:
I have had a purchase order in at B&H since June, 2019, for the new Nikon 500mm, PF 5.6, lens, but still have not received it. I saw Steve Perry's video on some ideas at where to look for the lens but that proved fruitless. I'm now asking if anyone else have had some luck getting the lens, or have an idea or suggestion where someone might have the lens. Lucky, Steve Perry has two 500mm lenses.

Thanks


Apparently, demand has exceeded expectation by a long way and Nikon admitted it is only producing 1000 500mm f5.6 PD EF VR lenses per month worldwide.
Go to
Sep 11, 2019 07:38:59   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Any one using Panasonic G9 with Panasonic 100-400 for birding
lrm wrote:
Thanks. I do have a Nikon 1.4TC which I occasionally use on the200-500. Have considered the new 500Pf, but may take years to get, and don't know if I will last long enough to get one. Will look at the 300 as suggested.


I was never very happy with image quality when using the TC14EIII on my 200 - 500mm: but it's a different story when used with the 300mm PF ED VR.
Go to
Sep 10, 2019 05:52:20   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Any one using Panasonic G9 with Panasonic 100-400 for birding
lrm wrote:
Getting old and need to lighten the load. Birding now with Nikon d500 and Nikon 200-500 with excellent photos. Anyone using and getting excellent results for birding with the Pana G9 with their 100-400.

Also, Linc - if u see this say hi.


I owned a D500 + Nikkor 200 - 500mm + Nikkor 300mm PF ED VR + TC14EIII as well as an Olympus EM1 mark II + PanaLeica 100 - 400mm and Olympus 300mm f4 + TC14. The D500 + 200 - 500mm is a heavy but cracking combination. The D500 + 300mm PF ED VR + TC14EIII is a lightweight but brilliant combination and one you may care to check out. In a comparison between the Nikkor 300mm PF ED VR (with and without the 1.4TC), the PanaLeica 100 - 400mm and the Oly 300mm f4 (with and without the 1.4TC) I judged the Nikkor 300mm and Oly 300mm to be equal. The PanaLeica lagged behind them optically. Obviously, it is more versatile than the primes so it depends on what you value most from a lens. The PanaLeica is a very good lens for wildlife/birding and I had no complaints. But I strongly suggest you look at the D500 + 300mm PF ED VR + TC14EIII prior to swapping systems - you should find the lens and TC available on the secondhand market. I now use a Sony A9 and A7III + Sony 200 - 600mm but there is no appreciable weight saving over your current system.
Go to
Sep 9, 2019 06:07:18   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
mirrorless cameras i.e. Sony
kpmac wrote:
They are the future but they haven't surpassed dslr's yet. Faster autofocus? Hardly.


You should try a Sony A9 if you believe a mirrorless camera can't take on a DSLR. My A9 easily out performs my Nikon D500. The new A9II will be even better. Even my A7III matches my old D500 for AF performance and both my Sony cameras have the brilliant EyeAF.
Go to
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Sep 9, 2019 05:59:47   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
mirrorless cameras i.e. Sony
docsteve wrote:
I went to upgrade my camera selection, thinking I wanted canon or Nikon; whereupon I was introduced to Sony mirrorless cameras which were quite light and impressive. the salesperson(Best Buy) said this was the new wave and that the other manufacturers were eventually going to mirrorless cameras. Said they were faster and AF far surpassed Nikon and canon. Comments solicited.


He probably meant the Sony A9. My last DSLR was a Nikon D500 and AF doesn't come much better than that. I now use a Sony A9 and Sony A7III. My A7III readily matches my old D500 for AF speed and accuracy and my A9 surpasses it easily. To be honest, in the full frame mirrorless world, Canon and Nikon can't match the Sony A9 and may still be playing catch up to the Sony A7RIV in terms of AF capability. I have no loyalty to any manufacturer, but there is no way I would change from Sony given the performance of the A9, A7RIV and the forthcoming A9II.
Go to
Aug 24, 2019 08:27:24   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Back up camera
tuomi1947 wrote:
I have a Nikon d7200 and am looking for back up camera ? I do own some afp lens , trying to keep price lower , having hard time because the afp lens are not in line with older camers ? Any help ?


I'd go with a secondhand (from a reputable company) D500, D7200 or D7500. You already know how good the D7200 is; but may not be aware what a marvellous camera the D500 is.
Go to
Aug 24, 2019 08:22:42   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Ordered a new computer yesterday
jackm1943 wrote:
I want to make it clear that I am by no means a computer expert, but my 8-10 year old 8 GB HP Pavillion has really slowed down recently and a cooling fan keeps coming on when doing as little as surfing. And some parts, such as the graphics card, are no longer supported. So, instead of going to the Big Blue store, I went to a local computer firm and am having one custom built for me that hopefully will last me as long as needed. The computer will contain;
- an Intel i7 CPU
- 16 GB RAM (can be increased if needed)
- 500 GB SSD (I keep my image files on a 2T external hard drive)
- GeForce GTX1050 Ti graphics card, 4GB
- CD/DVD reader/recorder
- Windows 10 home premium
- At least two #3 USB ports and several #2 ports, and all the normal accessories and connections.

They will transfer the contents of my current computer and destroy the old one if I want.

I am perfectly satisfied with my fairly old 24" Samsung monitor so will continue with it for now. I'm using PS CC2019, Bridge, ACR, and Zerene on a regular basis. It was a little pricey so hope I've not made any major mistakes here.
I want to make it clear that I am by no means a co... (show quote)


Very close to the PC I may have built by a local company, should I decide on replacing my Sony A7III with a Sony A7RIV. I use a Samsung 55" UHDTV as a monitor and will be sticking with that.
Go to
Aug 23, 2019 08:14:50   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Considering move from Canon 80D to Olympus OMD E-M1 MII
Jclear wrote:
Anyone who has used the Olympus, please respond with your thoughts and experiences. I am a 71 year old disabled vet with bad back and strength issues stemming from a form of ALS, and the Canon w/18-135 and Tamron 100-400 is getting difficult carry. I am considering a change to the Olympus and comparable lenses. I understand they are two completely different forms of camera but interested in pic quality and whatever your thoughts are on the Olympus. I am on a limited budget but don't want to give up on photography. Most of pictures are a mix of travel, zoo and wild life. I am considering selling the Canon and lenses to off set the cost of the Olympus, what are good prices for them? Thanks in advance. John
Anyone who has used the Olympus, please respond wi... (show quote)


Some time ago I changed from a heavy Canon 7D mark II and 70D system (which included a Canon 300mm f2.8L IS and a Canon 100 - 400mm f4.5/5.6L IS mark II, to an Olympus EM1 mark II system. The EM1.2 is a fantastic camera and in my hands easily surpassed the 7D mark II. I also owned an Olympus 12 - 40mm f2.8, Oly 40 - 150mm f2.8, Oly 300mm f4, Oly 12 - 100mm f4, Oly 60mm f2.8 macro and Oly 1.4TC. As far as I'm concerned, every one of the above mentioned lenses is stunning, especially when used with the EM1.2. Given your physical limitations, I would recommend the 12 - 100mm f4 and the 40 - 150mm f2.8 + 1.4TC. The 300mm f4 is the best lens Olympus currently produce, but it is a little heavy and has a limited application. The 40 - 150mm is stunning and produces superb results, even with the 1.4TC fitted. You may find many of the above available on the secondhand market and provided you use a reputable company (MPB, KEH in the US, MPB, London Camera Exchange, Castle Cameras in the UK) you can make huge savings. I assume being a disabled vet means you are an ex- squaddie (soldier) rather than an ex - vetinary surgeon - hence I included US companies. Good luck.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 44 next>>
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.