Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CatMarley
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 292 next>>
Jan 19, 2020 17:51:40   #
edupen wrote:
I have a Nikon 7200 thinking of buying a full frame Nikon D810. Will the lens for the Nikon 7200 work with the Nikon D810?


Yes in DX mode, but you will have fewer pixels, because the camera will only record the mid portion of the screen.
Go to
Jan 19, 2020 17:40:53   #
royobrett wrote:
Can't decide whether buy the D850 or the Z7. I understand it is the same screen? Any thought?


Handle both. The lcd is the ~same on both, but the EVF is the big improvement on the Z. Bulk and heft are the real differences.
Go to
Jan 9, 2020 14:04:13   #
Superpimp wrote:
How can I take pictures at nite of the shy


Wide angle, large aperture, slow shutter speed and big ISO is the recipe.
Go to
Jan 9, 2020 13:51:52   #
Ron29 wrote:
I have been considering the purchase of a Canon RP camera. While playing with one in the local camera store and turning the power switch to the off position, the auto sensor cleaning symbol shows up on the LCD. I got to thinking about the close proximity of the camera sensor with the rear most lens element. Where does this dust go? Does it find it’s way to the rear element of the attached lens? Not sure how the dust sensor technology works. In the case of the Canon RP I have read some reports that the shutter blades can create some dust.
I have been considering the purchase of a Canon RP... (show quote)


People on this forum spend a lot of time worrying about hypothetical problems. I have been using 2 mirrorless cameras for several years, and have not seen any dust problems - and don't expect to. And if I do I will buy a little blower and blow it away. It is simple. You take the lens off and you're looking at it! There is no mirror in the way to block access. Worry about something real!
Go to
Jan 8, 2020 15:48:24   #
Jwa wrote:
I’m travel this year to Utah. I have a nearly 10 year old D3100 with a Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 and an AF-S Nikkor 35mm 1:1:8G lenses. My question: Can I get quality, sharply focused, photos; ( photography skills not withstanding), or do I need to spend $$$ to increase my chances at some photos I’ll cherish?


Lots of people were getting great photos 10 years ago! Your camera was brand new then!
Go to
Jan 8, 2020 15:42:42   #
rmorrison1116 wrote:
What does that even mean?!


It is the usual nonsense.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 12:29:53   #
hj wrote:
I have to agree with you that CHG CANON is very knowledgeable. He helped me immensely a while back. The stats on the Canon G5Xii are very good but so are those for the Canon G7X Mark II at about $200 less. Same size cameras and very similar. You should compare them at dpreview.com using the "camera compare" feature. I too have decided to give up my 80D DSLR in favor of a smaller camera with 1" sensor. I chose the canon G9X Mark II and really do love it as I didn't need the articulating LCD screen and it costs less. Excellent IQ, smaller and lighter weight. I've already sold my two big white lenses and will sell the Canon 80d shortly. Age takes it's toll on the human body and small adds convenience to the photographic experience unless one is a PRO.
I have to agree with you that CHG CANON is very kn... (show quote)


For someone looking to photograph small kids or animals, an articulating screen is a must. Especially if your age interferes with getting down on your belly to get a floor level shot.
Go to
Dec 27, 2019 12:07:18   #
tcthome wrote:
Are you talking about the time it takes to recharge in between fires/shots? You could check out the Godox line of flashes but, check the specks. If your using full power, see what the recharge time between shots before purchasing. You might have to go for a more expensive flash to get fast recharge times. Good luck.


Ditto on Godox! Excellent Flash. Very well made and for a lot less than you would expect for something this quality!
Go to
Dec 25, 2019 13:58:44   #
evcarter wrote:
Hi All,
I just got a Nikon TC 20E III teleconverter for my nikon 200-500 lens. I am shooting with a Nikon D500 body. I did check to see that AF should work with this combo however, the lens searches for focus constantly and will not settle on any subject.....not even a tree in the yard! Is the teleconverter defective or is the info I found on af wrong? TIA!!


Your problem is not enough light for autofocus to work. Now if you had a mirrorless with an EVF like my Fuji XT-2 Your autofocus might work, and if not, manual focus would work just fine!
Go to
Dec 20, 2019 12:28:42   #
Terkat wrote:
Good morning "treefarmer" - Please tell your wife I love her too - if only from afar. My beautiful spouse is very much like yours although in light of my occasional (frequent?) GAS attacks she will inform me that "He who dies with the most toys is STILL dead".

All the best to you and yours and Happy Holidays

Terry


All you males with perpetual GAS remind me of what my mother said about men. "Men are simple creatures, daughter. If you want to keep a man happy, all you have to do is feed him well, give him plenty of affection, Tell him he is a good boy every day, and make sure he has plenty of toys!" I found her advice to be true. I also found it works equally well for my dogs!
Go to
Dec 19, 2019 22:05:32   #
Bill P wrote:
Ah, Cat, you are in the wrong forum if you feel that way.


I am beginning to realize that. I am too old to begin suffering fools.
Go to
Dec 19, 2019 13:51:32   #
Bill P wrote:
All of this hot-air-blowing is because you have a flawed assumption. You are assuming that the same lens will always be used on both FF and APS-C. Don't you remember what you sixth grade teacher told you happened when you assume?

And all that "extra light that is thrown away" isn't exactly worth its weight in gold. There's a reason that camera manufacturers make FF lenses and APS-C lenses.


Why is the assumption flawed?
when describing a physical event, it is customary to limit the variables to the single variable being examined. This is customary in science, even if not in the 6th grade. Also, people who have both full frame and crop sensor cameras often use their full frame lenses on their crop cameras, and vice versa for their full frames that have a crop mode.
Go to
Dec 19, 2019 13:44:56   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
No one needs a diagram or decision tree to recognize the beauty of a full-frame sensor.


No one needs a constant flow of drivel, either.
Go to
Dec 19, 2019 11:15:36   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If your sensor throws away 60% of the frame, how will you ever achieve your potential as a photographer?
Go to
Dec 19, 2019 11:06:36   #
DocDav wrote:
A technical question.
I know that the more pixels you squeeze into the same area, each pixel gets smaller and at some “smallness” or other, you start to get an increase in noise.

Obviously, a full frame camera has more pixels just due to the larger size.

I shoot a cannon 80D crop sensor.

Keeping this all in mind my question is.

When I shoot with the same focal length on crop vs full frame and then crop my final product, it seems logical I need to crop less close with the smaller sensor than the larger sensor to get the same ultimate size since the same, say 50mm lens, is effectively longer on the crop camera getting me closer to my subject. Because of this full frame envy and pixel envy aren’t all they seem to be?

Yeah, I have full frame envy but to be honest, I get pictures I like with my current camera but the above question has just always bugged me and figured a few in here can provide an answer. I still want a full frame but want to learn more tech details anyway. Also partially my effort to learn and understand pixel's better.
A technical question. br I know that the more pixe... (show quote)


The lens projects a certain sized spot of light bearing the image onto the sensor whether it is a small aps-c sensor or a full sized sensor. In the case of the small sensor you are only recording the center of that spot of light, and with the large sensor you are recording nearly the full width of that spot. The real question is, if the small area of light will be recorded by 24 mp, and the large area by 36 mp, will there be any difference in the detail and sharpness of the recorded image? And the answer is that it depends on the number of pixels per mm of the sensor - ie the pixel density of the sensor.

In this diagram, the orange bar is the light image, and the green bar is the sensor.


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 292 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.