Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: NealB
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next>>
Jan 5, 2015 19:58:16   #
nicksr1125 wrote:
I ordered a Vanguard carbon fiber tripod New Year's Day from B&H. It comes with a ball head that should support a Tamron 150-600 when I save my nickels & pennies. What's so special about a good gimbal head that I should spend another $300.00.


I bought a Nest for my Sigma 150-500mm and it makes handling the lens easier in the field.
Go to
Jan 5, 2015 19:52:27   #
Sunnybuck wrote:
Thank you NealB. Hope your circumstances change and you get to practice, practice some more and experiment with that lens soon.
I didn't realize Sigma was coming out with a 600mm. Have you got any insight as to when Sigma will be coming out with theirs?
Sunnybuck


The Sigma 150-600mm Sports version is already out. I have not heard a date on the Sigma 15-600mm Contemporary version. From what I have heard the Sigma 150-600mm lenses will replace the 150-500mm lens. Both 150-600mm lenses work with the Sigma USB dock so you can tune the lens at home to your camera and update the firmware via the internet. Nikon DonB on this site had the 150-500mm and sold it to get the 150-600mm Sports version so he can tell you how they both perform. MT Shooter on this sight has the most information on the Sigma lenses I know and he could help you out. You can send him a private message on the site or contact him at camera cottage.com.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 20:16:47   #
Sunnybuck wrote:
Hello fellow Hogs.
This thread is aimed at Nikon shooters in particular. I would like to know if any Nikon shooters have compared the Sigma 150-550mm to the Tamron 150-600mm lens, which one they thought performed better and why.
I've done a search here on the hog and found Regi's comparison. The difference is he's shooting with a Canon and his Sigma is a 50-500mm lens. I'm really interested in Nikon comparison of the two.
I recently upgraded from the D3100 to the D7100.
I am in the market for a longer lens than my current Nikkor 70-300mm lens. My price range is between $800 - $1,000 dollars for better glass. I've found that bird photos (Bald Eagles & Hawks in particular) have become my fancy. I just can't get a good reach with the Nikkor 70-300mm lens.
Any suggestions and or comparisons welcome.
Thank you in advance.
Sunnybuck.
Hello fellow Hogs. br This thread is aimed at Niko... (show quote)


I haven't compared the 2 but I purchased the Sigma 150-500mm for my D7100 mainly because of comments on the Hog and the $869.00 price. I am new to photography and wanted to experiment with a long lens but did not to spend a lot of money. I have been 100% satisfied with the purchase. Unfortunately due to circumstances beyond my control I have not been able to practice as much as I would like. If you are wanting 600mm I would wait until the Sigma 600mm Contemporary version is released. It will be at the Tamron price point also.
Go to
Jan 1, 2015 19:13:44   #
Mr PC wrote:
Cool, that might be perfect. As long as they don't charge medical prices! That's really about all the Optech bag looks to be.


They sell them on Amazon and the prices are not bad at all.
Go to
Dec 27, 2014 18:38:43   #
Well I guess I should quit complaining about 47 deg & rain in Indiana. Great pictures.
Go to
Dec 23, 2014 20:23:42   #
lulu48 wrote:
I'm looking to purchase a new tripod. My heaviest lens is the new canon 100-400. I'm 5'8" and don't like bending for very long (age is catching up with me!), which I found bothersome when I was trying to photograph the moon (which I learned from this forum, thank you very much!). There are so many choices I don't know where to start. I'd appreciate it if I could get a few recommendations from folks here rather than just read reviews online.
tia..


I have a Nest and even though it is not a well known brand the price you pay for what you get in return is great. You don't pay for the name. You just get a great tripod at a low price. Check with MT at Camera Cottage. Carter also has used tripods for reasonable prices.
Go to
Dec 19, 2014 14:50:34   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Even though this series was captured by Nikon cameras, the story still makes a Nikon shooter cringe. Lens ended in pool.
Polar Bear at a German Zoo Gets Its Paws on a Canon 70-200mm Lens
http://petapixel.com/2012/10/12/polar-bear-at-a-german-zoo-gets-its-paws-on-a-canon-70-200mm-lens


Now that's funny!
Go to
Dec 18, 2014 20:56:02   #
TalonFangClaw wrote:
Do any of you hogs own a NEST tripod? I am looking to buy one from a fellow hog whose name shall remain anonymous. I have read all of the posts recently and in search but I have found no comments on this particular tripod brand. I would be very interested to hear comments positive or negative to compare NEST to any of the other high-end carbon-fiber tripods. Thanks for your help. I hope to act quickly on your information.


I have the NT 404 which is the largest one that Camera Cottage sells. I absolutely love it and would buy again if I needed one.
Go to
Nov 30, 2014 15:34:11   #
MT Shooter wrote:
I guess I owe everyone here an apology.

It seems someone has decided my post above letting Basil know that he could get free shipping on the Nest Gimbal head from my website was "TOO PROMOTIONAL" for this website.
ADMIN has admonished me for posting such a grossly self-promotional post. Looks like I will be getting suspended or banned from this site for simply letting a member know where he can save a few bucks on shipping.
That is all!


First off you don't owe me an apology. I was not offended by your post at all. With everyone hawking B&H, Costco, and others I don't see the issue. Admin should be concerned about the ATTIC section after all this is a photography forum not a political site. Suspending you is just plain ignorant. Admin needs to get their priorities straight.
Go to
Nov 28, 2014 18:29:51   #
Basil wrote:
Has anyone here heard of the Nest NT-530H carbon fibre gimbal head? On Amazon they are selling for $437.99. I have opportunity to get one brand new for $298.00. Besides a couple of reviews on Amazon, I can't find much. Neither Adorama nor BH seem to carry this brand.


Purchased one from Camera Cottage (MT Shooter on UHH). I am completely satisfied with it and the service from Camera Cottage. I use it for a Nikon D7100 body with a Sigma 150-500mm lens attached. I also use a Nest tripod with it.
Go to
Nov 26, 2014 19:16:18   #
jfn007 wrote:
Maybe Costco should post their notice in print that does not require a magnifying glass to read. Thank you for the clarification, but I will still purchase from Best Buy or B&H. Best Buy has matched every B&H price I have ever brought to them. Have a great holiday.


You are right I have noticed that only car dealers are really vocal about what and why you are paying sales tax on. There is nothing wrong buying from B&H they have a vast selection and great customer service. I shop there also.
Go to
Nov 26, 2014 17:06:23   #
jfn007 wrote:
Whenever Costco posts an item for sale, in very small, tiny print, they post a message saying the item will be charged a sales tax at the original selling price of the item. This is legal in California, but I believe it is deceptive advertising.

I checked and Costco can do this, charge tax on the original price, but California law does NOT require them to.

I never buy high ticket items from Costco. Costco can never beat the prices offered by B&H Photo as far as I am concerned. Also my local Best Buy will match Costco's sale price and only charge me sales tax on the sale price. Screw Costco for their deceptive pricing.
Whenever Costco posts an item for sale, in very sm... (show quote)


What you are saying is correct and incorrect at the same time and needs to be clarified. If the seller is discounting the price from what they usually sell it for and absorb the full reduction they can charge sales tax only on the final sales price. If the price reduction is the result of a manufacture rebate/reduction to the seller and or the final buyer, sales tax must be charged on the original price. This applies to all sellers and the best example is auto rebates. Read their disclaimer. California law makes Costco and every other retailer in the state do this. Some one might charge you reduced sales tax but they must reimburse the state the full amount. As someone who has an interest in retail outlets in multiple states I can tell you Costco is not ripping anyone off. California is one state that never leaves a penny of tax money on the table. If there is a state that does not require them to collect the tax they won't because they do not want to ruin their reputation.
Go to
Nov 6, 2014 20:11:11   #
Morning Star wrote:
I'm playing with some night-time photography and because at this point what I take photos of is not important, I set up the camera on my sundeck.
So often we see suggestions about locking the mirror, using a 2 second delay or using a remote shutter release to prevent vibration resulting in blurred photos.

I followed all these "rules" and still ended up with a blurred photo. The lens was stopped to f/16, exposure set to 60 seconds.
So, two areas of influence I had not counted on: We live less than 2 blocks from a busy highway, and while the shutter was open, I did hear one of those heavy transport trucks go by.
And our sundeck has a wooden floor, and I walked away from the camera while the shutter was open.
Both causing vibrations that travelled through the tripod to the camera, resulting in blurred photos.
Although I was still mighty proud of them, as the street- and house lights in the photos did have the star points I was after: 14 star points, 7 blades in the lens.
I'll be out there again to try different settings, in this case the heck with the vibrations ;-)
Next time I'm at our son's, where there is no heavy traffic and they have 10 acres of solid ground, I'll try as well!
I'm playing with some night-time photography and b... (show quote)


Buy some silicone or nitrile sheet at least 3/4" thick that is a maximum durometer of 40 Shore A. Cut in to 4"X4" squares and place under each leg. The materials should cost between $5.00 to $10.00.
Go to
Nov 3, 2014 19:54:54   #
You won't go wrong with the Nest Gimbal. The operation is silky smooth and it is built like a tank. Fit and finish is flaw less. I have a Nest tripod that I mount it on and am totally satisfied with both. Nest and Camera Cottage (MT Shooter) two thumbs up.
Go to
Oct 31, 2014 21:22:25   #
Nikon_DonB wrote:
UPS just brought this "little" jem today. It's cold and real windy in Chicago today but here are a few shots anyway. None have been retouched.


Don it is nice to see someone else goes out and shoots garbage cans with their new lens like I do. I have found there is always a abundance of garbage cans and pot holes in my neighbor hood to practice on.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.