Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: oldgeezer3
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 25 next>>
Jun 1, 2015 15:41:23   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
How many colors can you see?
JD750 wrote:
What are you guys smoking?

There are ONLY 39 COLOR BANDS in the image.

Read the OP and go to the web site if you don't believe that.


It may be a difference in the computer monitors that may give more than 39 colors.
Go to
Jun 1, 2015 00:55:09   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
How many colors can you see?
If the bands are uniformly wide, there are 44. If not uniformly wide, then 39.
Go to
Jun 1, 2015 00:34:28   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
An old post but I still get a chuckle out it.
Love it!
Go to
May 20, 2015 10:23:30   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
Something for Seniors to do
Thank you for a giggle!
Go to
May 20, 2015 01:30:39   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Summer trip to Oregon Coast and Washington Pelouse
Be that as it may, I'll bet you can'tell the difference in taste between them!
Go to
May 20, 2015 01:09:01   #
(Photo Gallery)
Diogenes' lantern
The name of the flower is the name of the College Year Book where I went to college first. Pacific Union College, Napa County, California. And the plant grows only on the mountain where the college is. Thanks for the photo!
Go to
May 19, 2015 11:39:45   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Summer trip to Oregon Coast and Washington Pelouse
Marionberries are also known as Blackberries, so Blackberry pie and Blackberry Jam are just heavenly! Also, they are NOT exclusive to Oregon. They grow whever there is a cool and damp environment. We had them on our property in Olympia WA. They are also known as Himilaya Berries and originally from India/Nepal/Pakistan.
Go to
May 16, 2015 11:16:52   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Summer trip to Oregon Coast and Washington Pelouse
I'm a former WA resident, too. I recommend Palouse Falls, too. And Dry Falls at the South end of the Grand Coulee. If you have time, the Grand Coulee Dam is worth a visit, too! Have fun!
Go to
May 16, 2015 04:28:13   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
My first three cameras - what were yours?
Limiting to the first three I owned were a Kodak Baby Brownie Special, 1948; a Ricoh Super Ricohflex f3.5 80mm, 1959; Exacta VX iib, 1964. First photos from the Kodak were on a trip from Seattle to Sacramento of Crater Lake, summer of 1948. I was nine.
Go to
May 16, 2015 01:42:38   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
The 5 Most Spectacular National Park Road Trips
Several in California got missed! Traveling up U.S. 101 from Willits to Crescent City through some of the biggest trees on earth. Travelling from Visalia through Sequoia and Yosemite to Tioga Pass and ending in Lee Vining. If any of you hoggers have travelled these routes, you will never forget, right?
Go to
May 16, 2015 01:28:14   #
(Photo Gallery)
LA Sky line from the Deck of the RMS Queen Mary
Bill Houghton wrote:
Nikon 5300, ISO 6400, 1/5 of a second F 3.5 Kit lens 18-55 at 55mm.
Pano with three photos.


Very, very nice, but it's Long Beach. Los Angeles is quite a few miles north and can't really be seen, even from the top of the masts. I still admire the pano!
Go to
May 12, 2015 18:35:51   #
(Photo Gallery)
North Idaho Bald Eagle - Shot w/Nikon D-600 using Tamron 150mm - 600mm Lens
Instigating envy, are we? G.A.S. attack being generated, too! What will my treasurer say, now?
Go to
May 11, 2015 16:08:03   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
T3i vs T5i
I also am a pleased T3i owner/user. If I upgrade, I'm thinking of 7D or 70D or 6D full-frame, or just maybe a 5Diii. My thinking is that there is too little difference between a T3i and a T5i to upgrade in that dirrection.
Go to
May 7, 2015 17:42:26   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
I have to apply the crop factor 1.5 to apertures in my lens?
jlrivera wrote:
I have Nikon D7100 with Nikon Micro 105mm F\2.8 and Tamron 16-300 F/3.5-6.3. The crop factor for the D7100 is 1.5; so because of the crop, the Nikon 105mm is LIKE having a 157.5mm and the Tamron looks LIKE 24-450mm, that's ok with me. That is the same thing with the aperture the 1.5 crop applies?. So I don't have a F\2.8 it is a F\4.2? And the Tamron is not F\3.5-6.3 is a F\5.25-9.45? :cry:


You're right. You have to play with the math if you want your photos to look like those someone took with a full-frame camera.
Go to
May 7, 2015 17:35:34   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
I have to apply the crop factor 1.5 to apertures in my lens?
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Agreed!
This thread is an embarrassment.
Is there a way to delete a whole thing?
There should be a warning on it.
Talk about confusing people!!!

If the laws of physics have changed, I need to go back to school.

My hand-held light meters never had (or needed) any notation for converting light readings to different camera formats or lenses.


Your light meter told you what opening you needed for a given film speed AND shutter speed; OR what shutter speed you needed for a given opening AND film speed. Change film speed, change the other two; change opening, change shutter speed. The triangle is the same in the digital world. But--big difference in light-gathering capabilities between APS-C sensors anf full-size sensors. And THAT is what crop-factor is all about.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 25 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.