Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rdubreuil
Page: <<prev 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 next>>
Nov 7, 2016 12:53:05   #
SharpShooter wrote:

Genny, I'm not laughing because it's P&S!!!
I'm laughing because it's a Nikon! LoL
Get the Canon......!
Genny, welcome to the Hog!!
SS
img src="https://static.uglyhedgehog.com/images/s... (show quote)


You mean:

Crafted
After
Number
One
Nikon

Go to
Nov 7, 2016 08:34:16   #
blackest wrote:
Do you have a link for that adapter?


http://www.ebay.com/itm/AF-Confirm-Canon-FD-Mount-Lens-to-Nikon-F-Camera-Optical-Adapter-D4-D600-D3200-/181733087070?hash=item2a5022d75e:g:x4YAAOSwFe5X0n0s

There was also several others available.
Go to
Nov 7, 2016 07:50:16   #
I'm also a Nikon guy, I did a quick google search and I stand corrected, there is a new adaptor on the market for mounting Canon lenses to Nikon F mount bodies, but as you state there is no communication between lens and body, fully manual on that one. Of the ones I saw, again just a quick search, there were a couple for mounting Canon lenses to Nikon bodies that have focus confirmation chips (not auto focus) to aid in manual focusing the rest is manual adjustment. Prices also ranged widely.
Go to
Nov 7, 2016 06:42:29   #
Quick side note to BJW's response on no interchangeability of lenses. With adapters you can shoot Nikon lenses on Canon bodies, you can't however shoot Canon lenses on Nikon bodies due to mount size and configuration.
Go to
Nov 7, 2016 06:25:54   #
Hey Neighbor, nice shot. I wasn't aware we even had Cedar Waxwings here in NH. Keep shooting...
Go to
Nov 4, 2016 08:46:56   #
rdubreuil wrote:
I agree with Annie B, I'm ruling out motion blur as parts of the image are sharp on one side. The DOF or POF issues mentioned are less apt to be your issue. Note that a DOF and POF is are planes parallel to the camera sensor of given depth based on several factors, for example aperture and distance to the subject. The point being that the plane of focus and depth of field should be symmetrical across the image. In other words what's sharp on one side of the cat's face at the point of focus and depth of field should also be sharp on the opposite side of it's face. Look at both images and you can see that the images are only sharp on one side. To me this would suggest a decentered lens. To verify if that is the issue, setup on a tripod and shoot a flat target that is parallel to your camera, this will put the POF and DOF completely across the target. If one side is less sharp than the other, you've got a decentered lens and you'll have to send it out for repair and recalibration.
I agree with Annie B, I'm ruling out motion blur a... (show quote)


Here's an example of what I'm talking about. This little green bug on some berries, note how the plane of focus/depth of field run parallel to the angle the insect was at to the sensor of the camera. You can clearly see the depth of field and that it runs clearly from on side of the bug through the upper berry to the other end of the bug. If one side of the image was out of focus along that plane moving across the image it would be due to a decentered lens, not the DOF/POF or motion blur.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 4, 2016 08:13:16   #
I agree with Annie B, I'm ruling out motion blur as parts of the image are sharp on one side. The DOF or POF issues mentioned are less apt to be your issue. Note that a DOF and POF is are planes parallel to the camera sensor of given depth based on several factors, for example aperture and distance to the subject. The point being that the plane of focus and depth of field should be symmetrical across the image. In other words what's sharp on one side of the cat's face at the point of focus and depth of field should also be sharp on the opposite side of it's face. Look at both images and you can see that the images are only sharp on one side. To me this would suggest a decentered lens. To verify if that is the issue, setup on a tripod and shoot a flat target that is parallel to your camera, this will put the POF and DOF completely across the target. If one side is less sharp than the other, you've got a decentered lens and you'll have to send it out for repair and recalibration.
Go to
Nov 3, 2016 06:50:08   #
Awesome set of images Ron, nice and tight, nice and sharp, well done.
Go to
Nov 2, 2016 15:34:52   #
martinfisherphoto wrote:
With Nikon as fas as I know you can only do multiple exposures back to back. You cannot search thru your card, pull an image up and then expose over top of that one.. If I'm wrong, please someone point this out.. I'm not entirely sure if cannon can do this as well. Again, if I'm wrong please experience canon users point this out, as I love to learn new technics.


No you're correct, must be done during the multi exposure process. Depending on the Nikon model one can do up to 9 exposures. Once you've taken the number of shots you selected to use is when the camera will save the Raw or jpeg file.
Go to
Nov 2, 2016 15:30:22   #
Why not go with a DSLR, Nikon D3300 with kit lens under $500, then you can later get glass to meet your needs.
Go to
Nov 2, 2016 15:19:49   #
If you're looking to mount Canon lenses on a Nikon, you're SOL. You can mount Nikon lenses to a Canon body with adapters but not the other way around, sorry.
Go to
Nov 2, 2016 15:06:48   #
mcveed wrote:
Get a camera that has the resolution (number of pixels) and the dynamic range that will suit you for the future. Unfortunately you have listed two characteristics that are, to a certain extend, mutually exclusive - light weight and simple to operate. The light weight DX cameras are the ones with all the gimmicky 'modes'. The simplest to operate are the pro/semi pro models like the D3, D800, D810. But they are bigger and heavier. It takes a bit of study and a little work but it is possible to turn off or permanently set most of the settings that you don't want to play with. You can, of course, ignore all the silly gimmicky modes. I recently moved from a D800E to a D750 and I just ignore the features on the D750 that I don't want to play with. Virtually all of them operate on jpegs only so wouldn't be of any use to me anyway. If you are looking for simplicity stay away from mirrorless, they have more adjustments than the Hubble telescope. I'm not very familiar with the Df but it might meet your need for simplicity - but it's FX too.
Get a camera that has the resolution (number of pi... (show quote)


All Nikon DSLRs are RAW capable not just jpegs, in fact most from the D3xxx on up can save both jpeg and Raw at the same time.
Go to
Nov 2, 2016 14:52:21   #
Before you dump your D7000; have you tried correcting your problem using focus fine tuning built in the camera? A simple ruler set at 45° on a table propped up on some books , a vertical focus target (optional) lined up to a major division mark, a tripod at minimum focal distance for the lens, aperture wide open for thinnest DOF and plenty of light to get a good set of exposures, take an exposure and using the menus to access focus adjustment make an adjustment, another sample shot and continue until your camera is sharp at your intended point of focus. Camera will assign the offset to your lens, no need for you to remember. Do this with each of the lenses you intend to use on that body, only then if you're unable to get good results that way, you can send to Nikon for factory adjustment. Buying another camera in the D3XXX or D5XXX families could still have this type of issue with no in camera adjustment options as they are entry level cameras. If you insist on replacing the camera I'd say move up to the D7100 which is a better camera than it's predecessor the D7000 all the features you'll need and then some that you can grow into. Hope this helps...
Go to
Nov 2, 2016 13:20:50   #
Thanks for sharing, sounds like an awesome technique, will certainly give it a go. Your images turned out great.
Go to
Oct 31, 2016 07:48:20   #
Toss up between #1 and #4, leaning towards #4. Good luck, hope you do well in the competition.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.