Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: imagemeister
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1971 next>>
Apr 18, 2024 12:46:08   #
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
I have the 18-135 lens and have 10 wall hangers with them all 16x20 size. Sharp as I ever need. I try to crop in the camera and not blow up tiny sections.


I said I was ready for this .... .....and, yes I have seen the Imatest numbers on the 18-135 .....

I also have the Canon MTF charts ....
.
Go to
Apr 18, 2024 12:23:00   #
Nantahalan wrote:
If I want to improve a Nikon D500 image (20.5 mb), can it be made comparable to that of a D850 (45.4 mb)?

If so, how? Is that equally so for JPEG and RAW formats?

What are the trade offs?

Many thanks! I feel the way I did in analyzing family finances to pay for three undergraduate degrees at state schools in NC. The goals were for all of us to be debt free when they graduated. The kids were 1, 4, and 8. I could define various goals, factors, and assumptions. But I was never confident in my ability to set up the equations accurately. FYI the Andrew Tobias Managing Your Money program had a fill-in-the-blank section that handled it well. The upshot was that I needed to make more money and I figured the potential of my day job exceeded that of any side enterprises.
If I want to improve a Nikon D500 image (20.5 mb),... (show quote)


The cheap/easy way for pixel enlargement is to use the Adobe based "Bicubic smoother" in steps of 10%. This can be done in JPEG or raw. It works quite well - most people stick their nose up at this because it is too cheap/easy !

The expensive/harder way to do pixel enlargement is to shoot only raw and use one of the stand alone/dedicated AI software like Gigapixel. The computer nerds like this way......

If you are a hardcore photographic perfectionist you will not like either of these options - BUT - if you are a normal if it looks good I like it type person, then pixel enlargement can work for you.

You do loose some image FIDELITY with any pixel enlargement - YOUR exact thresh hold for fidelity loss is what matters.

I use the Adobe Bicubic and the Sony Clear Image Zoom sparingly when needed and I live life happily everafter ...
.
Go to
Apr 18, 2024 11:37:07   #
b top gun wrote:
I use only Nikon glass on my Nikon bodies.


That is why you need the 200-500 ...
Go to
Apr 18, 2024 11:32:43   #
jrcarpe wrote:
The Canon 18-135 would do a great job. I had the 28-135 and used it on a 40D and 70D with great results. I have a Tamron 16-300 now which I wish I had not bought. I just don't feel comfortable with it.


The 18-135 is not a GOOD lens - OK if you do not look close or if you have really never had a GOOD lens. None of the earlier wide range APSC DSLR lenses are any GOOD - only the short range ones are. Sad, but true .....8-(

And yes, I am ready for all the push back on this statement ...
.
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 17:58:14   #
If money matters right now , the 200-500 ..... if ultimate return on investment matters, save up for the 180-600.
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 15:32:18   #
ALL eagle shots are GOOD ! - some, just better than others ......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 15:19:18   #
BAchme wrote:
Need some feedback for purchasing my next lens.

I currently have a Canon 90 D. The only lens that will work with it is a Sigma 150 -600. It's great for my wildlife photography which is my focus, but I still need something else to continue to do other types of photography.

The budget is limited since the camera and lens are relatively new purchases. I want to do some landscape, flowers, and general all-around stuff. With my flowers, I typical lean more to close-ups, and I currently use my iPhone for that.

I am currently looking at trying one from Amazon (free return policy). The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is a Standard Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras (New, White Box). I know it's not a USM, but I wonder if it might be a stop-gap lens. I'm open to looking at other ones, but recently, this one has popped up.

I typically purchase from B& H. Also, open to refurbishment.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated!


Thanks!

Barb
Need some feedback for purchasing my next lens. br... (show quote)


Here is the lens I have/use and recommend - Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 - many GOOD reviews - it has been discontinued - there are some exorbitant prices for a few old stock out there , otherwise you have to buy used - https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/909806-REG/Sigma_884101_17_70mm_f_2_8_4_DC_Macro.html
Many dedicated APSC DSLR lenses are not being made anymore 8-(
..
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 14:59:24   #
IT looks like the Batmobile on steroids ! ........thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 09:19:56   #
Great perspective , GREAT set ! ....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 09:15:55   #
Very elusive ! .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 09:08:36   #
NICE catch - very attractive ! .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 09:03:03   #
NICE ! ......thanks for sahring
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 09:00:34   #
Definitely a bucket list candidate ! 8-) ......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 08:57:55   #
Wowzers ! .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 19:13:48   #
It is good that they have SOME place - but a shame there are no trees left for this 8-( .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1971 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.