Rongnongno wrote:
Cure vs vaccine...
To me the cure is more important than a vaccine.
So far it seems that once you get the virus and are cured there is no proof that you will not get it again. WHO is even warning about this.
Than makes me wonder if the vaccine - if one is found - is worth anything. The purpose of a vaccine is to train the body to react against a virus. Seeing the successive warning about being to get it again and again - meaning that the body has not learned to defend itself - what is the point of a vaccine?
Is not a vaccine made to prevent getting ill from the virus by exposing the body to a weakened or dead virus so that it learns from exposure???
If a person who has survived the first round is exposed again and that person's body has not learned anything... What is the point of a corona vaccine???
Cure vs vaccine... br br To me the cure is more i... (
show quote)
I get a flu shot every year, because immunity to a flu does not last all year. The flu shot (a vaccine) gives me that immunity (at least, to those strains included in the shot) for the coming flu season.
There are coronoviruses (virii?) where immunity lasts a very short period. The common cold is one of them. A vaccine, if developed, wouldn't get you through the cold season.
No one yet knows how long the immunity conferred by Covid-19 will last. It's a close relative to SARS, so there is some hope it will be permanent. In that case a vaccine, once developed, would be needed once. But it might be like the flu, and be needed periodically. People's best guess today is that it will likely last longer than the cold, but no one yet knows for sure.
If it's like polio or SARS, or even the flu, a vaccine is possible and useful. If it's like the common cold, we're in deep doo-doo.
There are reports of a small number of people who appear to have become reinfected with Covid-19 after having been cleared of it. We don't know enough to evaluate this group, but there may be several possibilities, any or all of which may apply:
- It could be a testing failure. Tests, properly conducted, may have false positives and false negatives. And human error could mean that some individual tests weren't valid at all.
- It could be you need a minimum viral load to develop immunity. It is worth noting that those who appear reinfected also seem to have had light or asymptomatic cases. But the sample size it too small to know if that will hold true over time.
- Some individuals may not develop immunity as readily as others. As a personal example, my brother had measles three times as a boy. Most of us got it once and developed an immunity, but he did not.