Posts: SBW | Ugly Hedgehog

Here's the thing, The English considered Washington and Jefferson as traitors, and correctly, I supose.

But Robert E. Lee is considered a Traitor by his former controlmen.

He wasn't in a difficult position: he turned against the country that educated him, that supported him, and that he pledged loyalty to, in order to support a radical state that he was born to. Treason is treason/

Tell us stupid what are controlmen? Your post. No Lee was not considered a traitor by his countrymen then or now stupid. Still studied in our War College stupid. He was never called a traitor until after the Charleston Shootings a couple of years back. Totally made up by the liberals and scumbag dems like you.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:27:03 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

Quinn 4 wrote:

After the war, Robert E. Lee was against having monument build and use of the battle flag. To him the war was over and time move to forward and rebuild, not looking back and build monuments to a lost war. Lee wrote that by look back South was cut itself from the way the rest of the country was going. He was right, for what happen last Sat is a remember that the South is still living in the past.

Are you retarded? Go back and read what you posted. It makes no sense, at all.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:25:54 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

dirtpusher wrote:

The confede
Was the Confederate army active 1963.

Or was the Confederate army active during all this.

Two thousand black churches burned between 1995-2005, but no one paid attention
http://observers.france24.com/en/20150702-usa-church-burning-arson-black-emanuel

2000 black churches burned in 10 years? Do say. Tell us more. You retarded fool.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:23:57 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

dirtpusher wrote:

Are they when they burn down churches.

What churches exactly were burned down, you cockeyed bastard?

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:23:17 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

user47602 wrote:

you're right, apparently there was a "2nd surge of the Klan from 1915 to 1940.

http://www.roanoke.com/news/virginia/second-klan-map-shows-pervasive-racism-of-s-america/article_b8b462dc-60e1-53de-bbb5-2795188a7004.html

Yes, the Democrat party needed additional reinforcement.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:21:56 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

dirtpusher wrote:

There is a slavery museum. Maybe you should research . Couple in fact.

https://g.co/kgs/pqHUwV

Take the bigot statues down.

Go fuck yourself you cockeyed retard.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:21:09 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

thom w wrote:

I'm guessing you call it "the war of northern aggression".

Don't you figure that the History had already been cleaned up a bunch before either one of us had even heard of the war.

I am guessing you are very stupid.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:18:56 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

jcboy3 wrote:

Well before the civil war. All Northern states had passed laws abolishing slavery by 1804.

That is a lie. You know it is a lie. They did no such thing. There were still slave holding states in the North after the war was over! U.S. Grant owned slaves immediately after the war was over. That is a FACT. When Lincoln issued the so-called Emancipation Proclamation (which he probably had no legal right to do) he only freed the slaves in the Southern States. You are a liar.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:13:08 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

thom w wrote:

Not really a 21st century thing, probably wasn't happening in FDRs time but I have to believe that many people considered him a traitor right after the war. As many people as were killed I can't believe that he was seen as a hero by everyone. I don't really have strong feelings about it but it never (20th century) really has made sense to me that we honor the worst threat our nation has ever faced.

Robert E. Lee is still studied in American War Colleges today.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:09:46 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

thom w wrote:

Rommel fought for Germany. He did not take up arms against Germany. Lee is different and Davis is real different.

He was the loser stupid, that is the point. Did you parents have any children that lived?

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:07:36 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

Twardlow wrote:

Their "right" to seceed was one of the fundamental questions of the war.

Even after they 'seceded,' they accepted Federal services such as the Federal Post Office.

It's an old and settled question now, but there is and there was no question the the South committed Treason.

Lee accepting command in the Southern Army was certainly treason.

Prove it was treason. Show, legally where it was treason. You are a liar.

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:06:37 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

Texcaster wrote:

Would you care to cite unambiguous legal precedent secession was legal at the time? Can you? Or is it just a gut feeling for you?

See below, why do you care coward?

Go to

Aug 18, 2017 22:04:03 #

(The Attic)

Afraid of history.

Twardlow wrote:

I have no idea of the point you try to make. The North proved by force of arms that secession was not possible, and any US citizen fighting against Federal Troops would be committing Treason.

Nuff said.

Sorry, stupid. Not enough said, stupid. The Southern states had every legal right to secede.

Read the Articles of Confederation (a founding document)

Then get someone to read this to you, stupid.

http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/01/14/did-the-south-have-the-right-to-secede/

http://peopleof.oureverydaylife.com/did-south-right-secede-north-during-american-civil-war-3347.html

http://www.bonniebluepublishing.com/The%20Right%20of%20Secession.htm

Go to

Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 876 next>>

Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections

UglyHedgehog.com - Forum