Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: micro
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 73 next>>
Aug 28, 2012 21:10:04   #
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.

Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (show quote)


Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=H... (show quote)


Micro,
We don't have a "pure" capitalism system in this country. If we did, it would probably be a Dictatorship. Social Security as it was initially instituted was not a problem. Now that it has been expanded and the funds stolen by our elected leaders (all Parties), the System, including Medicare, is not sustainable. If the National Healthcare System you are talking about (I must assume you mean Obamacare) is fully implemented in this economy; we will have a Depression that makes the 1929 Crash look like a cakewalk. As a wise woman once said: "Socialism only works until you run out of other peoples money."

By the way, my wife and I are both on Social Security and Medicare. These "Systems" must be fixed or everyone is going to lose their benefits. This is the opinion of every informed person in the country, not just me.


As for Police, Fire, Military Draft, and Federal Highway System, I fail to see what this has to do with Socialism. If you are trying to claim that these things (there is no Draft), wouldn't exist without Socialist policies, you are sadly mistaken.
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=m... (show quote)


I'm well aware that there is no draft, i was in the last one.

The government didn't steal from Social Security, they borrowed, we let them, they owe it back. You shold have voted for Al Gore who was laughed at when he proposed a Social Security "Lock Box".

Are Police, Fire, Public Schools, national highways, ....... socialist endevors, Yes they are.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=T... (show quote)


My dear God! Where do you you get this stuff Micro?

Our National Highway System was started by the Grand Pooba of Socialism Dwight Eisenhower. Please note the sarcasm!

We have had Police Departments, Fire Departments, and Public Schools in this country long before there was a organized Socialist Movement in this country. Where are you from, and where have you been living? I'm not trying to be insulting, but you seem to know so little about this country, I'm wondering if you live in the United States.
quote=micro quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=gm... (show quote)


That's the point, Eisnhower could never get through a Republican primary today.
Beyond that, leveying taxes for social programs is, by defination, socialism.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 21:08:17   #
Bangee5 wrote:
micro wrote:
Bangee5 wrote:
ngc1514 wrote:
I'm still waiting for evidence that "no expense was spared."

Have any?


Now you are being childish, very Liberal of you. Any comments on the Link? Did you read the story?


If the artical is true, the Republican Party is outragously stupid to spend money in that way. Your call!


Is this a game? You guys are being silly.


Good question, reasonable observation. I'm done being silly (too much time on my hands today).
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 21:06:29   #
gmcase wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
micro wrote:
So here is what you are asking. First you "cut and paste" an exhaustive list of rediculous claims, with no proof or evidence, and you want others to spend the time to disprove all of them. I'm retired and I wont waste my time. Here is what I ask of you, please... Reread the list and tell me that you believe the charges. Mrs Obama has 200 servants, dog trainer on retainer.....
Please think about it.


I didn't post it Sherlock. Rixprick said none of it was fact and was only opinion. I asked for citations that show the claims are untrue and are only opinions.
quote=micro So here is what you are asking. Firs... (show quote)


Well Einstein, when one makes acqusations against someone, they should bare the burdon of proof.
Why sould anyone waste their time providing you with facts when you refuse to do your own research.
quote=gmcase quote=micro So here is what you are... (show quote)


Sherlock, come on now. Someone made assertions and I asked for proof. How am I being unreasonable? He said nothing on the list were facts, only opinions. I find broad statements usually are false so I asked for citations. If he wants to spout off false assertions then fine but others should be aware of it. Nothing more, nothing less. If he can,t back up his assertions then don't make them. Shouldn't free thinkers support such a position?
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=micro So here is... (show quote)


No Einstien, someone asked for proof of the origional assertions. You aparently decided that a charge has to be disproved even though there is no proof to support the charges.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 21:03:48   #
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
FRENCHY wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.

Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (show quote)


Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=H... (show quote)


Please define socialist and capitalism . It is not a trick question ,just want your opinions on this
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=m... (show quote)


To start with I meant to say "I don't avocate communism any more that I advocate pure capitalism.

The defination of commusism, socialism and capitalism can easily be looked up, so I won't cut and paste.
What I mean by these terms are:
Communism - the government owns everything, no class structure, everyone equal.
Capitalism - private enterprise, rewarded for initiative and success.
Socialism - socal saftey net to educate our children, build infrastructure, protect citizens, care for the unfortunate.
Pure Capitalism - Corporation uncontrolled by regulations. Motivated by profit, uncaring, no conciece, no soul, no FDA, no EPA, corporate CEOs decide what is best. To me the financial crisis of 2008 was caused by "near" Pure Capitalism. This is the resurgance of Ayn Rand philosphy of individualism - take care of yourself, be successful, others are on their own.
Just MHO
quote=FRENCHY quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=T... (show quote)


Micro,
Now you have really stepped in it! First of all, in a Communist System not everyone is equal. That is the big lie they preach. The Communist Leaders have everything and the people are all equally poor. Don't you remember what the world found when the USSR crumbled? Everything outside the cities was Third World or less.

Now I am sure you would like us all to believe that the evil banks are in bed with the Republican Party. I hate to ruin your day, but the banks have been bankrolling the Democratic Party for some time now. As for the 2008 Crash, who was controlling the purse strings of this Country? A totally Democratic controlled House and Senate. Who was it who changed the banking rules before GW Bush took office, so that people who could not and should not be able to qualify for a home mortgage got one? Clinton! The Attorney General under President Clinton even threatened Bank of America with a federal law suit, if they didn't comply with the new rules. I'm not making this stuff up guys. Do your own investigation. The Democratic Party and the big banks brought our economy down and Bush got the blame. Pretty good, if you can get away with it!
quote=micro quote=FRENCHY quote=micro quote=gm... (show quote)


I steped in nothing (certainly not your not-so-clever trap), Communism in theory and Communism in practice are very different. Just as cipatilism in practice vs theory, etc. Only children believe there can be pure communism, capitalism, democracy.....
Both parties are beholden to their corporate contributors/owners. But if you have any level of consciousness you would know that a consistant objective of the Republican platform is deregulation (ie small government), except of course when it comes to peoples private lives. Democrats are traditionall for regulation of the boardroom not the bedroom.
You can believe that Bush did not let corporations run wild without any government oversight, as you can believe the earth is flat.
Now go try to fool me into another trap (I do admit I answered upon the assumption is that you were an honest person askng an honest question. Wrong on both counts.)
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 18:54:37   #
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.

Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (show quote)


Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=H... (show quote)


Micro,
We don't have a "pure" capitalism system in this country. If we did, it would probably be a Dictatorship. Social Security as it was initially instituted was not a problem. Now that it has been expanded and the funds stolen by our elected leaders (all Parties), the System, including Medicare, is not sustainable. If the National Healthcare System you are talking about (I must assume you mean Obamacare) is fully implemented in this economy; we will have a Depression that makes the 1929 Crash look like a cakewalk. As a wise woman once said: "Socialism only works until you run out of other peoples money."

By the way, my wife and I are both on Social Security and Medicare. These "Systems" must be fixed or everyone is going to lose their benefits. This is the opinion of every informed person in the country, not just me.


As for Police, Fire, Military Draft, and Federal Highway System, I fail to see what this has to do with Socialism. If you are trying to claim that these things (there is no Draft), wouldn't exist without Socialist policies, you are sadly mistaken.
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=m... (show quote)


I'm well aware that there is no draft, i was in the last one.

The government didn't steal from Social Security, they borrowed, we let them, they owe it back. You shold have voted for Al Gore who was laughed at when he proposed a Social Security "Lock Box".

Are Police, Fire, Public Schools, national highways, ....... socialist endevors, Yes they are.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 18:48:31   #
gmcase wrote:
micro wrote:
So here is what you are asking. First you "cut and paste" an exhaustive list of rediculous claims, with no proof or evidence, and you want others to spend the time to disprove all of them. I'm retired and I wont waste my time. Here is what I ask of you, please... Reread the list and tell me that you believe the charges. Mrs Obama has 200 servants, dog trainer on retainer.....
Please think about it.


I didn't post it Sherlock. Rixprick said none of it was fact and was only opinion. I asked for citations that show the claims are untrue and are only opinions.
quote=micro So here is what you are asking. Firs... (show quote)


Well Einstein, when one makes acqusations against someone, they should bare the burdon of proof.
Why sould anyone waste their time providing you with facts when you refuse to do your own research.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 18:45:23   #
Bangee5 wrote:
ngc1514 wrote:
I'm still waiting for evidence that "no expense was spared."

Have any?


Now you are being childish, very Liberal of you. Any comments on the Link? Did you read the story?


If the artical is true, the Republican Party is outragously stupid to spend money in that way. Your call!
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 18:42:28   #
FRENCHY wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.

Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (show quote)


Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=H... (show quote)


Please define socialist and capitalism . It is not a trick question ,just want your opinions on this
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=m... (show quote)


To start with I meant to say "I don't avocate communism any more that I advocate pure capitalism.

The defination of commusism, socialism and capitalism can easily be looked up, so I won't cut and paste.
What I mean by these terms are:
Communism - the government owns everything, no class structure, everyone equal.
Capitalism - private enterprise, rewarded for initiative and success.
Socialism - socal saftey net to educate our children, build infrastructure, protect citizens, care for the unfortunate.
Pure Capitalism - Corporation uncontrolled by regulations. Motivated by profit, uncaring, no conciece, no soul, no FDA, no EPA, corporate CEOs decide what is best. To me the financial crisis of 2008 was caused by "near" Pure Capitalism. This is the resurgance of Ayn Rand philosphy of individualism - take care of yourself, be successful, others are on their own.
Just MHO
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 16:57:08   #
Kit Lens wrote:
I believe in the end, the conventions are an opportunity for comedians to make money. The GOP only gets angry, because they have less comedians.
Take heart GOP, You've got more Country Singers than the Dems.


:thumbup:
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 16:51:53   #
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.

Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (show quote)


Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 16:44:21   #
Congratulations!
It's nice to be recognized.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 15:25:45   #
pigpen wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Please!! You think, act, and vote they way your told to.

Every rep/consv I know disagree on one or several topics, and how they should be handled. Every lib I know, goes right by the lib playbook, they always agree with each other. Funny. I'm seen many times here how a lib misunderstands another libs post, violently attacks them, then apoligizes, and suddenly agrees, after they found out that was the post of another lib.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Funny, I believe the exact same of the radical right (religous roght, neo-cons, tea party).
Interesting the perspective we have of each other.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 15:22:56   #
So here is what you are asking. First you "cut and paste" an exhaustive list of rediculous claims, with no proof or evidence, and you want others to spend the time to disprove all of them. I'm retired and I wont waste my time. Here is what I ask of you, please... Reread the list and tell me that you believe the charges. Mrs Obama has 200 servants, dog trainer on retainer.....
Please think about it.
Go to
Aug 27, 2012 23:11:07   #
Hal81 wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Dont make them right.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Nope, it makes them thoughtful. Conservatives ???????
Go to
Aug 27, 2012 23:09:43   #
jkaye65 wrote:
You are so delusional. Ever heard the quote "use it or loose it"? If you don't start thinking for yourself you are gonna "loose" you mind. Your brain will be what your on-screen name already is.

Who the hell cares whatever ad you referenced. I don't even need to go to it. Top democrates were on TV saying Romney was responsible for the ladies death. Another liberal lie!


micro wrote:
BigBear wrote:
micro wrote:
Drigby1 wrote:
But Mitt Romney had nothing to do with it. He had left Bain, she lost her other insurance, but her husband's insurance did kick in. So the story meant to harm Mitt Romney is false, the incident of the cancer is true, but Mitt Romney cannot be held accountable. Why the story? Because the Obama camp cannot stand on it's 4 years. They have been the worst of any presidency. He shoots out lying blaming stories to keep the focus off of the real issues.
If you have read any of the releases of stories of Mitt Romney, true ones, then you would know this is a man that serves and helps others: Reference- when he was with Bain he shut down the company for a day and had everyone look for an employee's missing daughter. Please quit listening to Obama's lies, and look at the issues. Thank you.
But Mitt Romney had nothing to do with it. He had ... (show quote)


The ad never blamed Mitt Romney.
Every fact mentioned, was true. If Romney wins and congress repeals the Affordable Healthcare Act, many more will die.
quote=Drigby1 But Mitt Romney had nothing to do w... (show quote)


I really find it hard to understand how you can be so warped in your thinking and what you perceive to be true.
quote=micro quote=Drigby1 But Mitt Romney had no... (show quote)


Please, google the ad, it mentions Baine (which is true) and never mentiones Romney. He also lost his health insurance. If they lived in any other western country they would have access to affordable healthcare. That is what the Republican party wants to undo in the U.S. That is warped!


Now for warped, Romney says to a group ni Michigan, "nobody has to ask for my birth cirtificate to know I was born right here....."
quote=BigBear quote=micro quote=Drigby1 But Mit... (show quote)
You are so delusional. Ever heard the quote "... (show quote)


Possibly in your fantisy world.
What top Democrat sad that??
Rush, Beck, O'Reilly aren't Democrats.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 73 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.