Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: GED
Page: <<prev 1 ... 51 52 53 54
Feb 10, 2018 13:48:44   #
I would be interested to hear from anyone that has personal experience using or viewing images on the Canon LCOS projectors compared to Epson 3LCD, or Optima DLP projectors. I don't need factory specs or manufacturers info, just real world users and viewers evaluations on color quality, and resolution. Thank you in advance for your time.
Go to
Feb 7, 2018 10:48:22   #
I agree with many of the suggestions given thus far Labs, Goldens , Shepards, Corgi's are great but hard to travel in deep snow, we have a Border Collie which is incredible so easy to train and intelligent it's like having another person with you. I honestly believe most of those breeds could serve you well, what is most important is the time you invest with the dog. Daisy says hello!




Go to
Feb 4, 2018 09:12:04   #
Pixelmaster wrote:
As bright as the orange color is the message to those who would think of eating one of these
critters is stay away. The Orange Spotted Newt produces a toxin that helps protect to from
predators. They can grow up to six inches long.


Nice photo pixelmaster, we normally refer to these as eastern red spotted newts, with the stage you've shown being a red eft juvenile stage which spends about two years on land as a terrestrial then returns to water and becomes an adult aquatic eastern red spotted newt which are green on top with red spots and a yellow belly, generally about 3 to 5 inches long. It is interesting to watch a predator try to eat one, either the eft or the adult newt they usually spit it out very quickly.

Good job!
Go to
Feb 2, 2018 10:01:56   #
jerryc41 wrote:


Nikon has supported the owners of their equipment as well as could be expected through many years of technological advances ( film to digital, manual to auto focus, etc.). I have been using Nikon equipment since 1972 and lenses purchased then still operate perfectly on my D810 as they have on F2, F3, F4, F5, and current cameras. I am sure Nikon will support your F mount equipment with whatever new systems they develop as that has always been a major part of their philosophy and is what has kept me and thousands of others in that system all these years.

Buy your new lens and enjoy it!
Go to
Feb 2, 2018 09:25:43   #
via the lens wrote:
Hi, keeping your mouth shut and finishing the class is the smart way to go (I've done the opposite before and it was a mistake). You can always write a letter to the college after you finish the class letting them know what you thought of the instructor. As your instructor came from a news media background he is simply teaching what he knows and he is obviously biased toward what he knows, rather than being open to all of the possibilities. I teach LR at a junior college but never have I told anyone what they should do: I offer up all the possibilities and facts and then let them decide what works best for them and their photography goals. Shoot to match what your personal goals are, not what his personal goals are. There are many possibilities in photography and it is sad to hear that an instructor is so close-minded. Take what you can from the class and move on.
Hi, keeping your mouth shut and finishing the clas... (show quote)


via the lens gives good advice, in the field of photography I found early on it was best to seek out the people who's work you admire and study under them when possible. You waste less time and money, you learn the field techniques that will produce top quality work, and in present times the pp techniques that augment the field work you did previously. I don't know what type of work you desire to do, news reporting, or natural history but if it is natural history and you wish to sell your work you will be competing on national and international levels. If you don't wish to sell your work but just shoot for enjoyment and want high quality the procedure is the same. I agree with via the lens, your instructor is just teaching what he knows and is familiar with. If that is the type of work you want to do then his program would probably be suitable, however if your desire is to do many other types of photography you will need to shoot in RAW and pp for the highest quality.
Go to
Jan 29, 2018 07:47:46   #
BebuLamar wrote:
I do not think the Megapixels is important in this case. You're in difficult situation because you have to work with low light yet needing good DOF so a fast lens won't help. Additional lighting may help but I understand that you can't bring lots of them in like reflectors etc.... I don't think you even can use a tripod? Focus stacking hand held and in a crowded room?? I doubt it would work.
I have the Nikon DF which could work with low light quite well but if I am in your situation I don't think it would work. I could bring a flash that has enough power to bounce but still at a medium aperture like f/8 the DOF isn't enough for close up shots of the model.
I do not think the Megapixels is important in this... (show quote)


Good answer
Go to
Jan 27, 2018 13:24:13   #
GreenReaper wrote:
I’m probably going to open a can of worms (again), however i’m About to pull the trigger on a DSLR that I can afford.

I’m comparing the Canon T-6i and the Nikon D5600.
Any thoughts from folks that have actually used either one of these cameras?

I’ve used the Nikon film cameras in the past and was impressed with the quality of the optics. I’ve used both the Kodak DCS early digital cameras and preferred the way the Canon handled the image. Yes, believe it or not for awhile Kodak put out a line of pro-quality DSLRs. The DCS 520 and the DCS 620. One was Canon and the other was a Nikon. I throw that out as a bit of trivia for those that may be interested. Not looking to start a war, just some personal experience. Thanks in advanced, Mike
I’m probably going to open a can of worms (again),... (show quote)


Both companies make excellent equipment, each has it's pros and cons with some of that based on the individual using it. With proper technique either will produce the highest quality images if using quality lenses. I have used Nikon equipment since the 70's and have been happy with the quality work it will produce as well as the support from Nikon when needed. One issue that was important to me was the ability to use any Nikon lenses I already owned on the latest model cameras I would purchase. Engineering for non obsolescence is an important factor to me.
Go to
Jan 27, 2018 13:01:19   #
Excellent work well done!
Go to
Jan 25, 2018 07:58:09   #
joer wrote:
Gimbals are designed for long, heavy tele lenses. They can be restrictive with shorter lenses. I use a Wimberley but I would not recommend it for a budget buy.

A lot of Hogs are sold on the Nest which is about 1/2 the cost.


I have used a Wimberley for many years under under all kinds of conditions and terrain I can highly recommend am not familiar with nest product.
Go to
Jan 11, 2018 07:44:28   #
bellgamin wrote:
In my youth I traveled a lot. Took pictures of people & animals in nations around the world. Mostly used 36-shot 35mm color slide film. The family enjoyed my slide shows, after I culled the junk out. The kids grew up & I quit taking pictures -- I quit shooting in the days when film cameras were still in their hey-day.

Now I am starting up again, taking pictures, & everything is digital. Technology has passed me by. So I bought a digital P&S camera to try & learn about the new-fangled gear before spending a lot of $$$ on better equipment. Digital or not, I still want to be able to show my pictures on a big screen, as I did in the old days. But my pictures end up on a little SD card & I am clueless as to how I can project the pictures from an SD card. Is there a way to do this? Is there such a thing as a projector where I can stick an SD card in a slot on the machine, & it will project my pictures onto a screen?

Second neophyte question: I loved using my big old Twin Lens Reflex to get negatives that were useful for really large enlargements in the old days. But I suppose that there is no digital analog to a "large negative" is there? In which case, can those dinky little SD cards yield pictures that can be enlarged really big, & still not get all grainy?

P.S. I feel a bit out of place in this forum so far -- everyone here seems way advanced & I don't want to cause things to get dumbed down. Too bad there isn't a forum section for rank amateurs.
In my youth I traveled a lot. Took pictures of peo... (show quote)

bellgamin everybody is always learning, no question is a bad one.

Yes you can use an sd card in a projector as well as your pc, tablet, phone, and other devices. There are basically three types of digital projectors available DLP, LCD, and LED.
Digital light processing, Liquid crystal display, and Light emitting diode also called LCOS technology.

I won't go into the details of each, you should research that on your own to determine which type best suits your needs. The differences in the technologies each have advantages and disadvantages such as bulb life, cost, contrast, overall image color and quality and other parameters.

One important factor to consider when purchasing a digital projector is brightness or Lumens. You want to make sure your projector has enough lumens to overpower the ambient light in the room your using. Better projectors for large groups will generally be in the 3000 to 5000 lumen range.

Many photographers will design their slide show on a laptop then just connect to the projector for the presentation. Hope this was of some help to you.
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 06:13:09   #
Kmgw9v wrote:
I don't sell cameras either; nor do I beat myself up worrying about the money I spent enjoying life.


Great outlook!
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 19:54:17   #
Erns Eye wrote:
In using the new 300 f4, have you experienced flare when shooting birds on water from the fresnel optics? I saw some samples of the flare which had blown out whites in water pictures. I wasn’t sure if it was shooting with not the best camera settings or a lens issue in that situation. I also plan to shoot in jungles which tend to be shadowy with bright light peeking in between the foliage. It is a high contrast situation. The wildlife moves so I am not sure that VR will help. The bright light filtering through the leaves might create flare, but I am interested to hear what your experience has been.
In using the new 300 f4, have you experienced flar... (show quote)


I have not used a 300 f4 my experience has been with the 300 2.8. and performance of that lense has been stellar. Sometimes when shooting white birds in bright sun on water a polarizer can be helpful but it will cost you some light. This fall I observed several people trying to photograph elk that were in a dark grove of hemlocks with the low early morning sun coming up behind the elk and the photographers shooting straight toward the sun. The result was flare and unhappy elk photographers. When using telephoto lenses my personal habit is to use the hood designed for the lense and I try to set up so direct light creates a shadow over the front element and does not shine directly into the lense. The high contrast situation you refer to is a good place to experiment with the Nikon active D lighting mode which will help to give a more natural contrast range in that example. The d810 has that feature and I'm sure the d850 probably does as well. The dynamic range of the d810 sensor is 14.8 evs which will give you a lot of information to work with later. In situations like yours I will sometimes carry a Minolta 1 degree spot meter and just take several readings to see what the range is as light quality changes. You could have the same result using the spot meter in camera on a long lense but to me it's easier to just use the small spot meter. Best of luck to you Erns Eye sorry if I bored you with things you are already aware of.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 10:05:08   #
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 08:47:11   #
The OP has received many opinions and much information about his question which is good.

I believe he was headed down the correct path when considering a 300 2.8 lense for the situations he is working under. Having photographed at Conowingo and Muddy Run for Whitetails and birds and working in less than ideal lighting a good portion of the time I would offer a few thoughts. When working in the northeast such as southern Lancaster Co.area a good portion of your days are not cloudless, same as under jungle canopy. I have shot with 300 2.8, 400 2.8, 500 4, 600 4, and 800 5.6 Nikon lenses and the reason I tell you this is you would not want to hand hold any of these lenses except for the 300mm. The 300mm is hand holdable and will give you 420mm at f4, or 510mm at f4.5, or 600mm at 5.6 in a smaller lighter package than the other lenses I mentioned when using teleconverters. The 300mm 2.8 Nikon lense has VR and internal focusing and is a fantastic lense which will work great with the D850 you mention, I have been using a D810. It is an expensive lense as most things are of high quality. Remember that autofocus systems work best with faster lenses and if you can possibly borrow or rent a 300mm 2.8 and a 200mm-500mm 5.6 zoom and compare your comfort using them and the end results only then will feel totally satisfied with that large of a purchase. Just keep in mind that a f2.8 lense will take in 4 times as much light as a f5.6 lense. If you don't have the light and you need the shutterspeed then your ISO has to increase and with it noise increases and quality goes down. One other factor many fail to consider is as the magnification increases shutter speed becomes more critical to obtain sharp images. Hope this is of some help to you.
Go to
Jan 6, 2018 11:50:13   #
The Nikon 300mm 2.8 lenses have all been excellent quality lenses. Yes they are a bit larger and heavier than the f4 variety however in lower light situations be it the jungle or early morning or late afternoon the brighter viewfinder is worth the trade off for me. By adding any of the excellent Nikon teleconverters you have a lot of versatility in a relatively small package.
I understand equipment weight is a determining factor for many people for various reasons, however weight is also an advantage when it comes to dampening vibration. One other consideration is the ability to have nicely diffused backgrounds (bokeh). I would recommend renting one for your trip if you think you might be interested.
I will attempt to include a few photos taken with a Nikon 300mm 2.8 but I have not posted any photos here before so I'll see how it goes. Best of luck to you!


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 51 52 53 54
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.