profbowman wrote:
With my weak eyesight, I missed the reference to the Lunt 60 in your first post. Sorry about that. And I had already made a b&w (grayscale) of your photo [see attached], but I was just wondering if if your original data might have had a bit more detail. So, thanks for sending that, too.
On the photo section I enlarged and enhanced, one can see what I believe is a filament that shows up because we are looking straight down on top of a prominence. Is this your thought, too.
What I was wondering about when I asked about the filter was how good the filter was? In particular, did the blocked wavelength regions match where the camera's sensor was sensitive so that only the 393..4 nm line came through to the sensor. One does not want any of the near infrared region nor the long wavelength ultraviolet to get the sensor or the sensor would record that unwanted light.
BTW, the specs for the Lunt 60 claim a bandpass of 2.2 A. I have not done the calculation yet, but I was wondering if that is wide enough that the blue- and Doppler effects of the rotating edges of the Sun's disk are still within the filter's allowed region or not.
That might be an interesting calculation if one is interested in that kind of detail.
Thanks again for your helpful data. --Richard
With my weak eyesight, I missed the reference to t... (
show quote)
The Lunt 60 is tunable to some extent, i.e.: from no surface features to no proms to reasonable detail but regarding the blue and Doppler effects, I don't know.