And if you could swing the A6000 it focuses faster and has WiFi.
My NEX-7 is very good and light the menus are not that bad my only issue is that it focus very slow.
You like to keep your sanity :)
Nice,I love landscapes but I get paid as a wedding photographer so I need some speed and low light capability and reliable focusing, so what do you think of the D3x in that situation.
I was talking about Nikon cameras below D3s
My D800 has a focus assist lamp and all camera below it this tell me that there is an inferior focusing mechanism inside it, this camera takes great pictures once it can see.
Getting a Nikon flagship camera either new or used will completely change your mine, the balance and the performance is topnotch the price difference is not a ripoff.
This statement might get everybody CRAZY but in the Nikon world every camera body below the flagship cameras(D4s,D4,D3x,D3s, D3,D2xs etc...) are inferior in some way. The big thing is the focusing mechanism ,exposure accuracy,tracking subjects, frame burst rate I could go on, and if image quality is the most important get an 8x10 view camera because they are the best.
PS. Sorry Hasselblad
The only thing are the pixels between the two cameras I would think 24 is better than 12,what say you?
I have a D800 but the body with the grip is NOT pro like
D3s is faster and higher ISO but less Mp D3x I think better for landscapes.
Thinking about getting a Nikon D3x I don't need this, built in 2009 the firmware is old by today's standards and the ISO only goes to 1600. Now I own a D800 and a D2x but the body is like my D2x which is so pro like and full frame.....joy :)
This shot was taken near the Crofton area the camera was a Nikon D2x 26mm f/20 1/40s ISO400 and yes I am a Raven fan but a New York transplant.
Very little PP just enough to see the sky autumn is glorious in Maryland.