Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rocketride
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 132 next>>
Dec 9, 2015 13:06:36   #
Kuzano wrote:
OK... I get it now.

I add a button to a process that has been working for me for forty years.

Focus on subject, lock the focus with half lock on shutter button recompose on frame for composition, complete shutter action.

Who's trying to confuse/retrain someone here?


Actually, I generally do things the same way you describe (usually using only the center focus point), but I can see the use for BBF in not having to refocus each time for repeated photos of the same subject.
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 12:18:21   #
burkphoto wrote:
You know, there really is a ton of good stuff on Instagram that is taken entirely with, and processed on, smart phones. Now, as prolific as teenagers are, there's a lot MORE crap than good stuff, but the volume is so high that there is plenty of interesting photography to see there.


Photography proved the 'infinite monkeys' theorem at least somewhat valid. (Which isn't to say that there aren't competent photographers using cellphone cameras.)
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 11:47:27   #
billwassmann wrote:
As an old man, with 73 years at this craft, I find this interesting. We seem to be headed back to the earlier days of photography when George Eastman brought out box cameras to get people involved. Now everyone thinks he is a photographer. Unfortunately, they forget about lighting, posing, composition and other "unimportant" stuff.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 11:46:56   #
hamtrack wrote:
The smart phone is always in focus, as far as it can see. As soon as they make it easier to transfer shots into a computer, it will probably count ten your out for the P&S. In the meantime I still carry my Panasonic Luminx in my pocket, in case I spy a great shot at Walmart.


So, you're the guy getting all the shots of WalMartians.
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 11:42:32   #
But if they have any non-p&s modes, then they're not point-and-shoot cameras for the purposes of this discussion. Heck, even my FF DSLR has p&s modes.

phlash46 wrote:
In one of 2 auto modes, they are point and shoots...
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 11:35:34   #
That sounds like it may be a limitation of the amount of RAM the computer you're doing your PP work on.

nikonshooter wrote:
If you want to try your hand at post processing. Then read on.

Last night was an ok night - "seeing" clouds moving in and out but I took another crack at M31 and have added the file over 400mb to a DropBox folder.

I used the same kit, Nikon D810a, Nikon 200x400 F/4 lens, Atlas Pro mount. Unguided.

I kept:

79 lights (subs) 30 second exposure, F/4, and 2000 ISO - IR UV cut filter and Light Polution Filter added
50 darks
50 bias
50 Flats

All Calibration, Registration, and Debayering was done in Deep Sky Stacker. The result was a file named:

Autosave.fit
or
Autosave.tif

I tried to add it to this message but got the message the file was too large.

If you are interested in seeing what you can do in Post, send me a PM or email with your email address and I will email you a link to Dropbox where you can download the file.

I have not idea if there is much to work with. I plan to work on it later this week when time permits.
If you want to try your hand at post processing. ... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 11:23:31   #
johneccles wrote:
I don't know what XM is but here in the UK all radio stations are free and do no need a subscription.
TV is different though you are obliged by law to pay £145.50 for colour TV or £49 for black and white, this applies to all TV channels including BBC.
There are however lots of exceptions, people who live in care homes, or aged over 74 do not pay any thing. One other group of people get 50% off if they are registered blind !!!


Sirius/XM is a subscription satellite digital radio system. (It's the product of a merger between Sirius and XM, hence the dual name.) We also have AM and FM terrestrial radio on more or less the same frequency bands as you do, and that is as free here as there.
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 11:16:44   #
They didn't die off, they migrated.

Doddy wrote:
Its The magnified shaving mirrors that scare me..there's more hairs growing out of my ears and nose than my head!!!
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 11:02:39   #
I'm not happy with any one kind of head in all situations which is why I have heads of all three types-- ball, pan-tilt, and gimbal.

One thing I do find useful with the ball and pan-tilt heads is a device called an "L-bracket". This is an L-shaped aliminum bracket that extends along the bottom and up the left side of the camera body with Arca-Swiss dovetails on the bottom and side. It allows the camera to be placed directly over the ball or pivots of the head in vertical shooting rather than off-balance sticking out to the side.

All of the Manfrotto heads I'm familiar with use Arca-Swiss compatible dovetails, so using an L bracket shouldn't be a problem.

Gimbal heads are mostly useful with long lenses which have rotating mounting brackets on the lenses themselves.

robertjerl wrote:
My opinion:

for a heavy lens ball heads are a pain, I don't use them

Pan tilt doesn't react fast enough on moving subjects

a gimbal reacts quickly

As to expense, you say 450 - 550

Add $50 and you can get NEST carbon fiber legs and head. Lighter, stronger, less vibration, more weather resistant.

Nest gimbal head $298, 55# load

Nest NT-6324CTM Traveller
Legs w/Monopod $299.00, 44# load and you have a monopod too

This rig will handle anything within reason, and supports enough you can hang a pack or whatever off the bottom for more stability in wind.
My opinion: br br for a heavy lens ball heads are... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 10:46:40   #
I'd suggest going on the Intel and/or Toshiba websites and looking for OpenGL drivers for the relevant chipset. If they don't exist, then I'd have to say you're probably SOL.

huskyrider705 wrote:
His laptop is Toshiba and when we tried it, we got a message that Open GL is required. Maybe your MacBook has that where his does not. Glad yours works. I don't have a problem with with my laptop or desktop either.
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 10:37:58   #
And of course, tilt-shift and view camera lenses are designed with image circles much larger than the intended format.

alfeng wrote:
FYI. The 50mm f2.8 El-Nikkor enlarging lens could theoretically be used with a 6x6 negative ... the edge projection with a 6x6-or-6x7 negative was marginal for enlarging, however.

.....The 50mm f4.0 El-Nikkor did not have the same coverage.

My preferred enlarging lens was an 80mm lens because it could be used with either 6x6 or 35mm negatives.
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 10:35:42   #
robertjerl wrote:
All lenses project a bigger circle than the sensor size, other wise you would have the corners of the frame cut off.


The edge (corner) illumination doesn't cut off anything like sharply unless you're dealing with a slow optical system. The faster the system, the more gradual the vignetting. (This effect is what lens reviewers are talking about when they mention the f# at which vignetting disappears.) The main reason that most lenses are designed to project an image circle larger than the diagonal of the sensor or film is to keep the vignetting manageable.
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 10:25:57   #
flip1948 wrote:
I fully understand that however there is a difference here as this is purposely being done on lenses designed for full frame bodies.


It's more likely that they're just designing for the intended image circle and using extra elements, better choices of optical glass, more efficient aspheres, etc.-- all of which became more practical with improved optical design software and faster computers on which to run it.

But they could be doing what you say. If they are, and if they're smart, they're trimming those lenses away from the stop down in diameter and only keeping the glass necessary to form the image in the circle corresponding to the sensor diagonal. This will keep the lens' weight down and also help keep light from outside the useful field from entering the camera. It would be simple enough to define a field size, design a lens to use with it and then redefine the field size down and 'trim away' all the glass which is no longer needed at any focal length the lens can reach.
Go to
Dec 9, 2015 10:04:06   #
Leitz wrote:
The major drawback for me is, back button focusing requires an autofocus lens :(


It wouldn't do you any good anyway. So just keep on keeping on. :D
Go to
Dec 8, 2015 16:30:50   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
If you get a rocket blower, use it in stages.

(1) it should be stored in a box so dust doesn't get into the blower. When you take it out of the box, give the bulb a few squeezes to blow any dust out of the nozzle.

(2) Charge the battery on your camera.

(3) when you take the lens off, hold the camera with the hole facing downwards (so dust won't settle back into the camera) and use the blower to blow out the mirror box (with the mirror down).

(4) Activate the "mirror up for cleaning" menu item and blow out the sensor area. Keep the nozzle out of the camera so it doesn't touch anything.

(5) Check to see if the dust is still there. I find the easiest way to do this is to bring up a blank white page on the word processor on my computer, set the camera to manual focus, set the lens to infinity and a small aperture, put the front of the lens as close to the screen as you can and take a picture. That should give you a fairly uniform gray picture. You may have to blow it up to check for small dust particles. If you see some, go back to step (4)

(6) If the dust is still there after several tries with the blower, it may be dust that is stuck to the sensor. In that case you have to decide whether you want to do a wet cleaning or have someone do it for you. It's not that hard if you have a reasonably steady hand.

Note that you don't want to use a time exposure instead of the "mirror up for cleaning" setting. The sensor is powered up for the time exposure, so static charges may make it hard to get the dust off. The sensor power is turned off for the cleaning setting.
If you get a rocket blower, use it in stages. br ... (show quote)


I hold the camera lens-mount down and point the blower up into the body.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 132 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.