Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Erik_H
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 158 next>>
Apr 22, 2017 08:31:16   #
I have one set up for macro, and the other for non-CPU lenses, I think. I never use them.
Go to
Apr 21, 2017 18:23:47   #
CHOLLY wrote:
I'm sorry, and I do NOT mean to be disrespectful... but if you go back and read my post as well as the post it contained in quote form, you will see that what I typed is 100% correct.

Again, no disrespect intended Erik...

As for the D5, well; click on THIS LINK

None taken. I'm guilty of not reading the quote within your reply. You are correct about the D810, D5, & D500.
Go to
Apr 21, 2017 14:42:06   #
CHOLLY wrote:
Those Nikon cameras you love ALL have Sony sensors in them.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.

Love the images you get from your Nikons? Well, the company that developed the technology to help you GET those images is making some of the best cameras ever produced. The A9 is just the latest example.

Like your D5? Well, the A9 is half the weight, has higher resolution, better low light performance, a better AF tracking system, AF points that cover the entire field of view (93%), shoots at nearly TWICE the frame rate WITH full AF and AE but WITHOUT blackout, and it costs $2000 LESS.

There are a LOT of people who will be convinced by this...
Those Nikon cameras you love ALL have Sony sensors... (show quote)

Every single one? Nope. The sensors in the D2h, D3, D4, Df, and the D5 are made by Nikon. As well as the D3100, D3200, and D3300.
Go to
Apr 20, 2017 23:22:26   #
Peterff wrote:
I agree, but if they did it would be the best fit....

Now if Nikon were to buy Sony's camera division...
Go to
Apr 20, 2017 23:09:08   #
Peterff wrote:
...Nikon is a good acquisition target for Sony if Sony is indeed serious about the high end camera market, not for the cameras, but for the lenses and other system stuff.

I agree, but I don't see Nikon selling out to Sony, or anyone else for that matter. They will dump their lithography and other poorly performing ventures first.
Go to
Apr 20, 2017 23:03:12   #
PixelStan77 wrote:
Erik, I am a Nikon guy. Love my D800 and my assortment of quality Nikon Nikkor lenses. No need for me to get a GAS attack and think Sony A9.

I'm a Nikon guy as well, I have eight of them sitting on my desk right now. But you gotta wonder why the big two aren't even trying to get into the mirrorless market (in a meaningful way), especially when something like this comes out that could really give a pro-level Nikon or Canon a run for it's money. As far as me though, I had a GAS attack a couple of weeks ago and bought an F3 and a couple more rolls of Tri-X
Go to
Apr 20, 2017 18:58:53   #
With Sony's announcement of the a9 and it's very impressive spec sheet I can't help but wonder if Nikon and Canon are ever going to respond with a serious mirrorless camera. The a9 looks to be aimed at pro, full frame shooters and I think it could really take a bite out of the DSLR market. While I have no plans to go mirrorless -hell, I still shoot film- I'd like to hear other's thoughts on the issue.
Go to
Apr 19, 2017 16:21:58   #
GPS Phil wrote:
...After a few weeks someone would have to break your arm to take it away from you!

Phil

They'd have to cut mine off!
Go to
Apr 18, 2017 18:44:14   #
redhogbill wrote:
LOL, yep, the aperure ring took me about 5 minutes to figure out, thought it was 1976 again!!

I shoot quite a bit of film still, and most of my lenses are "D" type, so switching between say, my Nikon F or F3 to the Df is pretty much seamless.
Go to
Apr 18, 2017 14:20:55   #
I can change important settings like ISO and shutter speed a lot faster on the Df than on a "modern" DSLR. The aperture I adjust with the *gasp* aperture ring!
Go to
Apr 16, 2017 17:50:51   #
BebuLamar wrote:
The Df is compatible to more lenses than any Nikon DSLR.

That pretty much sums it up. I frequently use my 1960's era glass on my Df.
Go to
Apr 14, 2017 16:07:55   #
moonhawk wrote:
Right--It just won't meter? My first Nikon was an F3-HP. Loved that camera.

I just bought the F3-HP. In fact, I have it with me at work now. So far, I love it.
Go to
Apr 10, 2017 15:42:43   #
Excellent shot! And to think that in it's heyday, all of London was probably about that tall.
Go to
Apr 9, 2017 10:49:33   #
fergmark wrote:
easy come easy go.

That's a great image. Maybe it doesn't take composition into account.
Go to
Apr 8, 2017 22:25:50   #
buckwheat wrote:
I found this site through another forum and find it fascinating and addictive. I guess it's not quite infallible as it rated one of Ansel Adam's photos at 11%. Of course it rated one of mine at 1.1%.
Here's the link: https://www.dpreview.com/news/8594541449/everypixel-aesthetics-uses-neural-networks-to-judge-your-photographs

I am pleased that it rated this on at 99.5%

I can see where it would be addictive. It could be used as a good keyword generator (I suck at keywording). My question though, is what they do with the images that you drag to the screen. They now have a copy of them, and could probably turn around and sell them without you knowing about it. Very nice shot by the way.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 158 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.