Thanks guys for the helpful suggestions. My monitor color is just fine as referencing from all the photos I've taken and uploaded, also from photos and videos I stream. I do not wish to change that. The reason I havent tried calibrating my printer is that I'm a novice with printers and their inner workings. I have much to learn and dont want to possibly make things worse by tinkering without knowledge. I can figure out most things with a little basic knowledge, but I prefer to read the instructions first, and there aint none. I didnt know there were any profiles or software for printing paper, but I'll look into it. I'm kind of old school, and I havent caught up yet. The last things I worked on troubleshooting were industrial analog instruments, which have been out of use for 25 years. Again, thanks for the help, maybe I could profit from a basic photography course which also covers printers.
Its 2 hours later, I had to make myself stop looking at them. WOW!!!I've done just a little exploring of abandoned stuff, it can be addictive. But to capture and share makes me sad knowing that lots of these sites will be gone before my lifetime is over. I'm 68, so thats not gonna be a lot of time. Simply amazing!!!
jerryc41 wrote:
Great shots here - and a book.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/art/photos-enter-an-abandoned-world-frozen-in-time/
I also have an Artisan 837, and I'm a little disappointed in it's color rendition. I havent asked about how to standardize or adjust it's output, but otherwisw it's a nice printer, at least on Kodak paper.
LFingar wrote:
I've had the Artisan 837 for several years and it prints beautifully. The only reason I would have to upgrade would be to be able to print larger then 837's maximum size of 8.5x11. The R3000 prints the same 13x19 size as the 1430, with the exception that it can use roll paper and print up to 13x44. Can you use that feature? Otherwise, considering the quality of the prints made by the Artisan series, I don't see where you would be gaining much. Bottom line: print quality probably is not a big issue, so are the other features of the R3000 worth the expense?
I've had the Artisan 837 for several years and it ... (
show quote)
Paaflyer wrote:
No problem. It is my wife's and she is sentimentally attached to it. Will be reducing the price shortly. Just testing the waters. Still learning too.
These little cameras were a big help to popularize Nikon as a camers for all 35mm fans, not just pro's. They are a good find, except that most (myself included) have converted to digital. I wish someone would make a digital back for Pentax 67lls. I'm looking at the D3300 as my next camera. FINALLY, a sensor to bring the image quality up to film standards, plus a processor to handle it. I hope I'm not disappointed.
RWR wrote:
When you click "Quote Reply," there will be no doubt as to whom you are replying.
Gotcha... I'm still learning thx
I'm sorry, I thought my reply would post directly under the post with the negative opinion. Clearly, if you have a classic camera for sale at a good price, you know cameras. I just dont care for people who dont, and say negative things about others. Thats not what these forums are for. Again, my apologies.
Apparently you dont know much about cameras IMHO
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol:
Would you please un-post, since the outfit is gone.
:thumbup: Gotta admit, the effects were entertaining, the talent, not so much
I dont suppose you have or know where there is a 6x7 or parts/lenses
YES!!!!!! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Modern English is a 'living' language, as opposed to Latin, which is considered a 'dead' language. This means you are correct that incorrect can become correct over time. It can be said that incorrect grammar, that which violates basic rules laid out to facilitate continuity and ease of usage, is NOT a sign of high level communication skills. Reading well written composition is a quick and easy method of transfering information the writer intends to communicate, while poorly written 'stuff' requires the reader to slow his intake of information while attempting to decipher what the writer is trying to say, often reducing or eliminating the reader's interest in the writing and his opinion of the writer as well.