Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CraigFair
Page: <<prev 1 ... 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 ... 445 next>>
Dec 11, 2014 08:02:31   #
Chuckwal wrote:
Enjoyed the set great colors
Chuck


Thank you Chuck
I'm not sure what the birds were that are labeled Black-headed Grosbeak
We are looking for some help?
Craig
Go to
Dec 11, 2014 08:00:03   #
Dixiegirl wrote:
Great photo project, Craig, and you have some super pictures. Gorgeous birds in your second photo, and the coloring is similar to that of the Black-headed Grosbeak, but that's not what it is. The bill is way too long and sharp. I wish I could identify it, but I'm afraid I'm not familiar with birds of the western states.

Your right Donna, now that I have a close-up photo of the birds I see the beak is different. So I'm not sure what it is. Maybe someone can help?
Craig
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 18:36:25   #
I spent a couple afternoons in the backyard photographing anything flying.
I was using a Nikon D600 w/ Tamron SP 150-600mm F5-6.3 Di VC USD Lens.
Craig

Western Scrub-Jay

(Download)

Black-headed Grosbeak

(Download)

Common Crow

(Download)

Western Honey Bee

(Download)

Boeing 757 @ 10 Miles

(Download)

Unknown Bee???

(Download)

Turtle Dove on top & Acorn Woodpecker

(Download)
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 17:59:34   #
I always look forward to you posts, Algol. Thank you for such great suff.
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 17:55:19   #
Algol wrote:
Here are two images taken back to back less than a second apart. It shows dramatically what the term "Bad Seeing" is and can do to your photos of the moon. Both exposures are 1/125 sec at ISO 400 shot at f/9 through an Astro-Tech 6-inch Ritchey-Chretien telescope.
In the first image notice the large mountain seen in profile along the limb of the moon (arrowed). In the very next shot it is gone and a depression now appears. These images were shot over some pine trees, and yes they will hold in some heat. Even your on body heat if you are standing downwind, or is it upwind, whichever, if the wind is blowing from your body toward the opening of the telescope will also create bad seeing. This is the main reason that astronomers both professional and amateurs will use long cables to isolate the telescope from themselves. The larger the instrument the more pronounced this effect is. One way to demonstrate it is to place a very out of focus star in live view of your camera and place your hand near the lens of the telescope or telephoto lens. Do this on an extremely cold night and you can actually see the heat currents. It resembles the heat currents one sees in the summertime on a hot pavement. By moving away from your instrument as much as possible as well as avoiding buildings, pine trees, pavement etc, your high resolution images should improve greatly. If you are shooting the moon, try to image it when it is at it's highest point in the sky. The lower you get to the horizon the greater the turbulence is in the atmosphere. Sort of like shooting something underwater looking up. I hope this helps in explaining one of the problems astrophotographers face and will help with those moon photos. One last point, if you happen upon a night when the stars are "not" twinkling and the moon is out, go for it because the atmosphere is steady.
Here are two images taken back to back less than a... (show quote)

Thank you very much Algo for this lesson.
I usually wait till after 11:00PM to photograph when the year cools off but I never even considered my own body heat, which make great sense as being a problem.
Craig
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 17:35:09   #
Just Fred wrote:
I joined UHH earlier this year and posted a photo under the topic To Post-Process or Not Post-Process. Back then, I used iPhoto to enhance a rather bleak and plain photo I took in Iceland.

Below is the original image and one I did today in about five minutes, with a minimum of clicks, in Perfect Photo Suite 9. I used Perfect Enhance to Auto Tone, increased the highlights and detail, and added a slight vignette.

As the old ad used to proclaim, "I've come a long way, baby!" Yes?
I joined UHH earlier this year and posted a photo ... (show quote)

You did a very fine job on the Repost Processing
Craig
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 14:01:47   #
bob_71 wrote:
My young great-grandson (now 7) has been fascinated with rocks and minerals for some time now. A while back I searched and found a source for "rocks for tumbling". I selected some for him to process on his tumbler and had them delivered to me. I figured I could examine them and be able to better discuss his hobby with him. I WAS AMAZED! Some of these stones are absolutely beautiful even before the tumbling! They also turned out to make excellent subjects for close-up photography. I have attached three subjects that I particularly liked! All these are pieces of larger rocks that have been fractured intentionally into usable sizes. They have had no other processing done to them.

Please view in DOWNLOAD mode!

Bob
My young great-grandson (now 7) has been fascinate... (show quote)

Hi Bob
Your Great-Grandson has good taste and a set of nice photos to go with it.
Craig
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 14:01:18   #
bob_71 wrote:
My young great-grandson (now 7) has been fascinated with rocks and minerals for some time now. A while back I searched and found a source for "rocks for tumbling". I selected some for him to process on his tumbler and had them delivered to me. I figured I could examine them and be able to better discuss his hobby with him. I WAS AMAZED! Some of these stones are absolutely beautiful even before the tumbling! They also turned out to make excellent subjects for close-up photography. I have attached three subjects that I particularly liked! All these are pieces of larger rocks that have been fractured intentionally into usable sizes. They have had no other processing done to them.
Hi Bob
Your Great-Grandson has good taste and a set of nice photos to go with it.
Craig
Please view in DOWNLOAD mode!

Bob
My young great-grandson (now 7) has been fascinate... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 12:42:41   #
DavidPine wrote:
In the pit eh... Rent a Df or D4s, raise your ISO fairly high, shoot RAW. I would rather have a 24-70 f/2.8 or a 14-24 f/2.8 being that close.


I second Dave's motion for the High ISO cameras. The D750 is only going to be good up to ISO 800. Both Lenses would be ideal. Noise is your problem in this shoot, ISO noise that is.
Craig
Go to
Dec 10, 2014 12:12:57   #
SonnyE wrote:
The Meike I mentioned will work as an on light, or as a flash.
I use mine as an on light to get set-up and focusing.
My subjects don't seem to mind it much, if at all.
And it has steps to brighten, or lessen the intensity.


I've been using mine the same way. I use mine to shoot products I put up for sale as well as some of the Macro work I do.
Some Macro gets Softbox some gets Ring Flash. Depends on what I want for Composition in the Shot.
Go to
Dec 9, 2014 12:06:37   #
bob_71 wrote:
You need to work with Hunter...he is obviously over-excited!

Your lens has quite a reach!

Bob


Yea, he just got through running at the dog park for an hour. Easy to photograph then.
This Lens has knocked my socks off, that detail at that distance just blows me away. At 600mm, it's worst rated focal length too.
The focus is fast, accurate and silent. So fast and quiet I had to turn the focus ring and auto refocus again to make sure it was working.
Today I'll play with DX mode, shorter focal lengths and Teleconverters.
Craig
Go to
Dec 9, 2014 11:12:39   #
dlmorris wrote:
Nothing wrong with the lens...when you're shooting something that far away, you have atmospheric haze and distortion to deal with. You'd need a lens with adaptive optics (as many of the new large telescopes have) to get much better... Or really steady seeing.


It was cold 58* and very clear seeing, about as steady as it gets for that view.
Very little movement in the telephone poles.
They are fairly straight up and down.
Craig
Go to
Dec 9, 2014 09:54:10   #
dlmorris wrote:
congratulations! You'll have fun with that lens! And a nice shot of your dog!


Thank you DL, He is easy on the eyes.
What I was looking for in #1 is the detail of the Structures on the hill that are 5 miles away and the vulture 1 1/2 miles.
Is the Lens up to the task from what you see. I saw the Vulture 1/3 of the way across the valley, raised the camera and fired off a full auto shot.
And that's what I got.
Thanks
Craig
Go to
Dec 9, 2014 09:17:17   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Reshot with both on and 1+ to fill for daylight
I like this Beetle, good focus on the mandibles.
Do you have leash on him to keep him around for photo shoots?
Go to
Dec 8, 2014 20:41:51   #
Got my new Tamron SP 150-600mm F5-6.3 Di VC USD Lens in he mail this afternoon.
I mounted it, stepped out in the backyard and fire-off 3 shots and ran back to the computer with the SD Card and found these.
All 3 are processed with Topaz Detail3.
#1 f/6.3, 1/320 sec, ISO 50, 600mm
#2 f/8, 1/50 sec, ISO 50, 600mm
#3 f/6.3, 1/13 sec, ISO 50, 600mm
Craig

#1 Turkey Vulture at 2 Miles Original

(Download)

Turkey Vulture Cropped 250%

(Download)

#2 Redtail Hawk Cropped 100%

(Download)

#3 Hunter My Golden Retriver

(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 ... 445 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.