That was definitely too much, and I just removed it.
Val wrote:
What I am confused about is why they took my thread down and since, I have seen alot of semi nude models posted and even a nude posting (not showing any body parts of course) like mine and in my opinion, tastefully done. Why is that? Is the Admin biased and only apply the rules to certain people?
Val, your shot was probably one of the best I've seen posted here.
And if we ever end up with a nudes section, I'll be sure to contact you and ask you to post it again. And I hope you'll agree to do so.
But for now, a simple rule -- that doesn't always work, but at least can be used as a rough guide -- is this: if it can be seen on the beach (and wouldn't cause a public scene), then it's OK to post it here.
What's with all the exaggeration?
photojim wrote:
My wife is a member (for over 9 months) of this web site
Hmm. The domain for this forum was registered on June 24, 2011. Which means the forum is a little older than four months. I guess saying that she has been a member of this forum for, say, three months wouldn't be enough?
photojim wrote:
and there are now at least 14 lady members who have decided to quit ugly hedgehog
An hour prior to posting this, you sent me a PM (from your main account, not from this throwaway account) stating that there are 5 women who are leaving -- trying to pressure me into taking action.
Now it's at least 14? Will it be 9,234,578,345 users leaving an hour from now?
photojim wrote:
seemingly shameless attempt to try and conert this web site into a poor mans version of a backstreet pornographic version of a cheap thrill magazine for perverts
Yes, the sky is most definitely falling. This is exactly what's about to happen here.
How can I take the rest of your arguments seriously when you post stuff like that?
That sucks. The link I posted is from a page set up according to the html standards.
If it doesn't even work for the guys that set the standards, then I'm not sure what I can do about it.
I'm still thinking of a solution to have horizontal scrolling in the filmstrip that would work with iPads. If I can't get it to work and end up keeping vertical scrolling, then I'll make the frame higher to accommodate two rows of thumbnails.
I noticed something about the Ugly Hedgehog abbreviations used on the forum.
While hedgehog is one word (a least according to
wikipedia) and the abbreviation should be UH, plenty of people seem to be using UHH.
I would like to establish one "official" abbreviation for contest titles and whatever else we might have in the future.
So what's the general opinion? UH or UHH?
I'll try to download and install Safari. If I'm able to recreate the problem on my desktop, then I'll try to fix it.
I'm not sure. You might want to search IE9 compatibility mode on Google.
If you happen to be using Internet Explorer 9, then try enabling "compatibility mode". Some people say it helps.
Is it Safari or some other browser?
Quote:
There are about 30 images submitted now, and the system is getting very hard to use on an iPad.
I changed the filmstrip to vertical scrolling for now. Please let me know how it looks on an iPad.
Hmm, I'll do some reading and see what's up.
When viewing a section listing, watched topics, or active topics pages, each topic has a corresponding => link on the right hand side. That links takes you to the latest post you've read in that topic.
Additionally, topics carry "new topic" or "new posts" labels.
Draco wrote:
I like it, just one question? Is there or should there be a size limit on the picture submitted?
The hard limit is 20MB per upload. JPG files.