Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: advocate1982
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11 next>>
Jun 13, 2017 10:28:34   #
Just as an aside. I do the farmers markets, sell the note cards etc., but the real reason is so I can get my portrait work out into public, and to book sessions for my portrait photography business. I find it very effective for that. The cards and prints pay for the booth, but it's the family sessions that I book that make me huge money.
Go to
Jun 13, 2017 10:19:10   #
advocate1982 wrote:
Why are you looking for a zoom? I shoot motocross with about an even split between 80-200 2.8 and a 300 2.8 with a slight edge to the 300. That's on a crop sensor camera Nikon.

Why are you not allowed on the track? I am assuming you mean somewhere other than the stands when you are saying track, and not out on the actual track.



I also have the Sigma 150-600 and I would not recommend it for Motocross. I use it for small birds, but a lot of times, I still prefer to use my 300 2.8 for that, and then crop in post.
Go to
Jun 13, 2017 09:04:51   #
Why are you looking for a zoom? I shoot motocross with about an even split between 80-200 2.8 and a 300 2.8 with a slight edge to the 300. That's on a crop sensor camera Nikon.

Why are you not allowed on the track? I am assuming you mean somewhere other than the stands when you are saying track, and not out on the actual track.
Go to
Jun 12, 2017 22:20:08   #
CaptainC wrote:
The people telling you to sell for X times your cost are only correct if the "cost" factors your time (how much per hour do you pay yourself), transportation, equipment cost (cameras and computers), insurance, etc.

So the "cost" is NOT how much it costs to print it, but all the above. If an 8x10 costs $2.50 to print, would you charge just $7.50 or $12 for it? If you did, you are paying the customer to buy from you. An 8x10 for less than $80-$100 is not part of a sustainable business. If your images are landscapes and the prints are matted and framed, then I would have to assume that even a small size like 11x14 would have to be at least $250.
The people telling you to sell for X times your co... (show quote)



exactly. my 8x10 costs me $65 to produce. The actual print is only $2.50 but by the time you get the rest added in, it's $65 my cost.
Go to
Jun 12, 2017 19:45:34   #
T.H. wrote:
Hello everyone, I am curious of how to price my photos. I've taken into account of the cost of Photo media and ink, but how do I put a price tag on what the photo is worth? Do I go by how long it took me to get the photo, or what extent I went to for the shot? A few years ago I sold two photos for $800.00 Matted and framed. But that was an offer from the customer. I did not set the price. So if you sell your work, Please help me out with any suggestions on how to do this. Thank You.


Price it for what? And what are you selling? Are we talking portraits, art, postcards?

But I would suggest much of the advice of taking your cost and multiplying by X is the wrong way to do it.

When I sold framed and matted art photos, there sold in art galleries for $1500. Others have had their work sell for much more than that. If I am selling for commercial use - then I license it based on size, distribution, and length of license. If I am at a local farmer's market, then 4x6 postcards go for $5 they cost me about 1 cent because I have them printed on actual printing presses rather than a photo print. An 8x10 portrait for a client ranges from $375 to $675.

As you can see there are lots of variable
Go to
Jun 12, 2017 14:40:05   #
rook2c4 wrote:
Numbering prints only makes sense if you are somebody well-known in the art world, and there are art dealers specifically seeking out your work because of the collector's value associated with your name. If you are not known, no one cares if they just purchased print #63/100 or whatever, because the print number serves no real purpose; self-imposed scarcity won't have an effect on the value.
They may not care today, but they will care when you do become famous.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 20:48:40   #
tomcat wrote:
Can you explain to me why LR sometimes defaults to the Pictures folder? As mentioned before, I import dozens of images each week from my external HD and the xmps always go back to the original folder in that same HD. This is only the second time in 10 years that the original imported files folder somehow moved itself from the external HD and ended up in the Pictures folder. Thanks :)


The short answer is because it has lost the path to the drive.

The long answer has so many variables that makes it hard to pinpoint a cause. Mine usually happens when I've been mucking with the drives. Sometimes when you plug the same external into a different USB port it will change the drive letter and throw everything out to lunch. I have all my drives named now with their drive letter, so if it doesn't match up with what explorer is telling me, I change it back to what they are supposed to be.

I also find that updates to either the operating system or to lightroom can do the same thing. The second last Lightroom update, lost my catalog, my presents for importing, exporting etc. Because I have my folders named for what is in them, it was easy to find the catalog, but it still didn't include any of the presets. For those I had to go looking to find where they were hid - and hid they were because they were in a hidden folder, under the users. Once I pointed to the right directory and restarted Lightroom they showed up, and then I promptly went into preferences and and changed the setting to store presets with the catalog.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 16:28:56   #
cjc2 wrote:
This is an area where the battery grip makes a HUGE difference. Wouldn't leave home without one! Best of luck!
Yep the grip doubles the battery life. 48 seconds. for how many thousands more?
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 12:56:45   #
Dan De Lion wrote:
-----

The D500’s replacement will be mirrorless with a top speed of 25 FPS and a 24mp sensor. With Sony’s poorly designed A9 (overheating, menu system, too small) to lead the way, Nikon will be forced into EVs, but, they won’t abandon the F mount. Given Nikon’s naming history, they could call it the EV550. Expect a larger body, than the A9, for easier handling and good heat dissipation. The EV550 will be available in less than 18 months.

-----

There is something about a battery life of 24 seconds for the sony that gets me. How do I get that number - the battery is good for 480 exposures. People keep pushing the 20 FPS rate as being a great feature. So you can blow through those 480 exposures in 24 seconds. Even if you don't use the 20FPS, the fact that the battery is only good for 480 exposures makes it not a practical solution for sports. It was the battery life of the D200 that got me to upgrade to the D300. With the D200 I had to pack four batteries to make it through a game.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 12:36:54   #
jamer wrote:
Most educators today are hampered by the system. Try to correct a child and see how quickly you will face angry parents, upset administrators and the threat of a law suite. The teaching profession is NOT what it once was. In the past---get in trouble in school, and face the consequences at home. Not so today. Get in trouble in school today and see how quickly parents come to defend and are ready to prosecute. We have helicopter parents and enablers. No wonder our children feel empowered to do, say and act anyway they want. Parents to the rescue!!
Most educators today are hampered by the system. ... (show quote)


Yep, you can say that again, and again, and again. When I got in trouble at school (which was frequently)- I was nailed to the wall when I got home. But the teachers are just as much to blame. When I was in school late 50s to late 60's, male teachers were in three piece suits and ties, female teachers were in the equivalent. They were authority figures that you called Mr. Miss, Mrs. they were not your friends, there were your teachers. I have my second grade teacher - who is nearing 100 years old, and she is still Mrs. Penrose, and even though she is a frail old lady now, I still cower in her presence (and given that I was a Sgt in the Airborne, cowering is not something I do). Today, the teachers are more worried about being friends. There is no dress code and the teachers will come to school wearing the same stuff that students wear and are all called by their first names.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 12:25:09   #
bull drink water wrote:
the number one culprit in my mind is the parents. kids bring to school what the parents instill in them. put well motivated kids in average ore even sub par schools and they will still excell.


Nope. The teachers will beat them down to the lowest common denominator. Remember, there is no first place in school today, everybody gets a medal just for showing up.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 12:18:30   #
I think everybody is reading way too much into this. I graduated in 1968 and if there would have been Facebook way back then, I could have probably posted the same thing. I never went to class, I never did homework, and I graduated. I continued it in College where I got degrees in Environmental Science, Law Enforcement, Advertising & Public Relations, and Journalism. My career has included Law Enforcement, Military, Journalism, and Photography. Now really at 17-18 years of age, who has any clue about what life holds in the future. I think that everybody (not just a few that cannot get out of it) should spend five years in the military. Why? Because basic training is a great equalizer. It takes the haves, and the have nots and makes them equals. It rips them from the bosom of their family and introduces them to the real world in a way that cannot be duplicated. It takes the members of the gangs away. It gives those that have never had an opportunity, an opportunity to shine. It takes the ones that have always had mommy and daddy running around cleaning up their messes, the need to take responsibility for their own actions. It solves the youth unemployment problem, and it gives them time to mature, get a grip, and gain a useful trade. Remember for every grunt humping a ruck and carrying a rifle, there are 10 others that are behind him making sure he gets fed, clothed, paid, etc. that the plumbing is fixed, that the electricity is working. Those are all useful trades that have huge shortages in the real world, meaning that when they get out - they can find a job. Those that don't want to do that, can now go to college, and it's free. Most importantly, instead of a clueless 18 year old, you are now dealing with 23 year olds that have the maturity and the ability to see what they really want to do with their lives.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 11:42:11   #
So, considering that the shutter speed was well below the sync speed, it has nothing to do with the shutter speed. That means it is either the flashes (which are on full power) are either not firing, not close enough to the subject, the aperture needs to be opened more, or TTL is screwing everything up.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 11:32:23   #
mas24 wrote:
Now that is a sacrifice.


Well that depends on how old you are. I wouldn't miss it anymore. But 20 years ago it would have been a huge sacrifice.
Go to
Jun 11, 2017 11:25:04   #
Ltgk20 wrote:
It doesn't matter to me. I have a Sony a99ii so I see everything I need in the EVF before I press the button as do all using mirrorless. However, I also shot film for 20 years where the was no chimping and with I little practice, getting a proper exposure was fairly easy.


Is that the $6000 camera with the 20 fps and battery charge is good for 480 exposures?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.