My preference is #3 for the rich colors and the terrific curved lines that lead our eye directly to the peek-a-boo mountain. Great contrast between the darker tones of foreground and the white of the clouds + I like the contrast of hard vs. soft, as well.

I find #1 uninteresting in comparison - mostly it's the blandness of the left side compared to the colors and shapes on the right. But the wide view does give us a nice documentary of the landscape. In #2 the weakness is in the foreground IMO - just not much there + an awkward cut of the closest rocks.

I do wish when people offered feedback in topics like this, they'd give the reasons for their choices. Kind of worthless to the OP (and all of us who are interested in seeing an image through someone else's eyes) to just tally yea's and nay's.

The question comes up every full moon on UHH Your moon was over-exposed. When it's dark outside it's hard to think about making a darker exposure (I kept trying to make mine lighter 'til UHH showed me the way five years ago). Google will give you lots of articles and tips and some settings to try, as will everyone who replies in this topic.

Personally, I prefer shooting the full moon near the horizon, just before sunrise or right around sunset so that the exposure shows the landscape too. Unfortunately, sometimes they can look "photoshopped" when just stuck in the sky like that

Five minutes after sunset, f/11, 1/13 sec, ISO 100 (with tripod).