Stash wrote:
Just one of the effects in PP. Thanks for looking Jerry.
Is PP Paintshop Pro? I used that software when I had a PC, but switched over to Mac years ago and it's not available. I miss it very much.
How did you get that edge effect? Very eye catching.
LennyP4868 wrote:
taken at sunset from the Brooklyn side at the Park by the foot of the bridge
A powerful picture - perfect timing on the lighting.
angler wrote:
...with some yellow flowers on it.I used Topaz clean and then Smart photo editor for the pp.Please check out the download.I'm getting bored now. :roll: :thumbup:
Fantastic color - I couldn't stop staring at the image.
GWR100 wrote:
Scotney Castle in Kent
Beautiful composition - a real keeper!!!
GWR100 wrote:
Early morning on the banks of the river Teme, Shropshire.
The best I've seen in quite a while - gallery worthy.
O2Ra wrote:
I don't want a d610 I was just asking about my lens. But that really seems like an awesome buy .
I wasn't suggesting you get a D610 - I was just wondering if your camera had an internal focus motor, and if so, would that allow you to still use your af/s lens on auto focus via the camera motor.
O2Ra wrote:
Hey hoggers quick question: I have the Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 afs-d got it a year ago used of course. The motor is going out and a reputable camera shop wants $530 to get it fixed for me. I paid $850 for it so is it worth it to get it fixed? I absolutely love the lens , I shoot action with it and it gives me razor sharp pics and almost never misses focus ( when the motor works) . If I get a new motor will it last me quite a while? The lens is awesome except for flare so what would you guys do?????
I also have an 80-200 f/2.8 D (not af/s) and shoot with a D610. If your camera has a focus motor in it, won't it still focus an af/s lens? For the price of a repair to your lens, you could almost buy a used/refurbished D610.
I thought I had read the manual carefully - thanks anyway. Maybe on my next upgrade.
Cdouthitt wrote:
Another option might be focus peaking...but I'm guessing that the OP doesn't have that feature either.
Sorry, I'm still new to some of the finer points of DSLR - what is "eye priority" and "focus peaking"? I shoot with a Nikon D610. Thanks.
travelerted wrote:
A particularly beautiful time of day to capture the feel of the Castello del Nero, Chianti Region of Tuscany.
The more I look at these photos, the more I realize what draws me to the pictures I take and those I admire from other photographers. It's not necessarily the composition or the subject, but the color. Sometimes I see a photo of an amazing subject, but the colors are uninspiring to me. And then I see a photo of a less dramatic subject but with vibrant color and I'm drawn to it immediately. Your photos invoke the latter for me (no disrespect meant about the subjects of course, but color trumps subject for me and yours are "color rich").
travelerted wrote:
After reading your post on one of mine, I looked up your profile and saw these interesting photos and 'story' behind them about the lenses you are using. I'd guess that photo number two is in Siena - lovely place to visit is't it?
Would like to see more of your photos from your travels.
Yes, Siena. We took a day side trip to Siena while we were visiting Florence.
I looked up your profile too, Ted, and found another "small world" item - my mother was born near Kamloops, Vancouver, British Columbia.
I'll look through my photo library and see about sending you a PM with some of my favorite travel pics. Of course, my favorite photos in general are of my grandchildren, which my kids don't want me to post on line out of concern for unsavory internet circulation.
Harvey wrote:
This goes on top of the photo on top of the foam board ( we used thick blank matting board.)- using a squeegee it flattens out/no wrinkles- where can't tell it is there. It then protects you image from dust and scratches. Sun light will still affect your photo depending pn the quality of ink and paper.
So, seems like a use the manufacturer didn't anticipate, but one that clearly (no pun untended) works like a charm. Now that I have it straight, I'll give it a try. Thanks for your patience with my questions.
Harvey wrote:
Scotch 3M
#568
Positionable Mounting Adhesive
for Mounting - Past up - laminating - Burnishing
11in X 50 ft also available in 16 in and 24 in width
Harvey: I'm a bit confused - I thought you had a protective film for the ink side of the photo paper. This seems to be for the back (non ink) side of the photo paper to secure the photo to a mounting board before hanging/displaying. Have I misunderstood your original reply to my post? Thanks.