Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bazbo
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 754 next>>
Jan 6, 2024 12:09:05   #
dennis2146 wrote:
You offer this idiotic opinion with no proof and written as a 4 year old would write and yet expect me to take you seriously. Here is your post:

Trump neither divestedd his assets nor did he put them in a blind trust.On paper, he gave day ro day control of the opwwrations to his sons. This was a sham and did nothing to separate Trump frombeneficial ownetship or control.

Trumpsplainin' at its worst.

Now other than the usual Left Wing moronic suspects, who in their right mind would take your juvenile post seriously? Nobody I know except lying corrupt Left Wingers. Now there's your cue to step into your own lying bullshit with both feet. You did didn't you? Got any proof of what you tell us or is it all just dumb nonsense written by a child? Looks like you need some new crayons. Don't eat them this time.

Dennis
You offer this idiotic opinion with no proof and w... (show quote)


You need to repeat my post even though my post is automatically included when you click on "quote reply"? You don't really understand how this works, do you?

Anyhoo, here is a primer of beneficial ownership. It is a little over simplified by maybe you can a-quaint yourself with the basic concept before you embarrass yourself again. Good luck.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/beneficialowner.asp
Go to
Jan 6, 2024 01:27:26   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Holy CRAP!!!!! Your post, loosely described as a post at that, means nothing to anybody with a real working brain. Not one of you little girls has a link, anything official, in fact, NOTHING to prove any point you are making.

Now in your specific case, this post, looks to be a conglomeration of writing skills from the little princess, lil denny and you all working together to come up with a joke, Who can write the most ridiculous post that OTHER lying corrupt Left Wingers will no doubt support 100%. Looks like you have succeeded with the other Left Wingers but with Conservatives, what a screwed up post you have submitted. Next time please have your legal assistant do the typing for you.

I would laughingly point out the spelling and grammatical errors for you as a gift to you and a joke for everyone else. But in your case there are just too many errors to point out. But OK I will point out the errors.

"Trump neither divestedd his assets nor did he put them in a blind trust.On paper, he gave day ro day control of the opwwrations to his sons. This was a sham and did nothing to separate Trump frombeneficial ownetship or control.

Trumpsplainin' at its worst."

Yeah. It IS the entire post.

Dennis
Holy CRAP!!!!! Your post, loosely described as a ... (show quote)



Oh my. Are you so insecure, dim-witted and unstable that something as simple as an opinion different than yours can trigger you lie this?

Apparently, yws. Poor thing. It must suck to be you.
Go to
Jan 5, 2024 12:29:18   #
SteveS wrote:
According to a letter provided to CNN on January 19, 2017, Trump resigned from over 400 businesses before taking office on January 20, 2017. If you need help with the word "resigned" look it up. I'm sure Merriam-Webster can help you out, or possibly a thesaurus.


Trump neither divestedd his assets nor did he put them in a blind trust.On paper, he gave day ro day control of the opwwrations to his sons. This was a sham and did nothing to separate Trump frombeneficial ownetship or control.

Trumpsplainin' at its worst.
Go to
Dec 29, 2023 05:37:54   #
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
Did we all miss something? Did POS Jack Smith charge Trump with insurrection? If not, dream on, my friend.


Does A14 require a criminal conviction? The original constructionists of SCOTUS are going to have an awkward time with this. I am confident that they will find a way to let Trump squirm away, but the legal reasoning will be a real torture chamber.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 10:40:47   #
Racmanaz wrote:
So you have no examples. That's interesting. Poisoning the blood of the nation? That's pretty vague.


I just gave you examples. Vague or not, I answered your question.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 06:27:59   #
Racmanaz wrote:
What many things has Trump taken from Mein Kampf and incorporated them into his belief system? Also, how would you know what's in Mein Kampf if you have never read it?


"poisoning the blood of the nation" for starters. Lifted almost ver batim from Mein Kampf. Regardless, it makes no difference whether he has read the text or not. His rhetoric has become starkly more Hitleresque. "Rooting out the vermin" for exanple.

Comparisons to Hitler are now in bounds.
Go to
Dec 14, 2023 10:46:24   #
travelwp wrote:
For bazbo and others who do not know how to use google:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdZeana-45M


Well, lookee here! You learned how to post a link! Good for you. Enjoy your new skill.

Now you have no excuse for not posting eidence other than simple-minded arrogance.

Pro Tip: No will take seriously or take the bait of your dopey catha questions as long as your only source is your own awesome self.
Go to
Dec 14, 2023 09:09:09   #
travelwp wrote:
Below are Chairman Comer's video remarks:
Well, not only did he lie about his son Hunter making money in China, but it also turns out that $40,000 in laundered China money landed in Joe Biden's bank account in the form of a personal check


It would be easy to post a ink to this, but you don't know how, do you?

PM me and I will show you how to post links. You're welcome.
Go to
Dec 13, 2023 13:14:05   #
travelwp wrote:
Yes, you do care about the question because you posted once again.

I don't post evidence, because people who are not locked into left wing websites are familiar with the subject. (Left wing websites will not mention unsubstantiated payouts to the Biden's.)

You should learn to discipline yourself to simply ignore posts that bother you. (this is probably your 4th post)


I"I don't post evidence, because people who are not locked into left wing websites are familiar with the subject. (Left wing websites will not mention unsubstantiated payouts to the Biden's.)"


That is completely incoherent. You posted a rationale for why you should post evidence. I guess you are immune from basic logic.

And I have a little surprise for you: I don't need your permission on where and what to post.
Go to
Dec 12, 2023 12:13:55   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Shame on you Denny, it was a joke and he referred to his ability to issue Executive Orders undoing what Biden has done...

You folks who run with this BS are just nuts.


Every time Trump barfs out something odious, people like you say its just a joke. Yeagh, tihs was a real knee-slapper.

Jokes are supposed to be funny ad there was nothing funny about Trump's fantasy about "Dictator for a Day!"

Given the full context of what Trump has said abut his second term combined with the Heritage Foundation Project 2025, the peol;e who try to write this off as just a joke are the ones who are nuts.
Go to
Dec 12, 2023 11:47:10   #
Texcaster wrote:
Who even bothers to make this stufff up? That would be Cadet Bone Spurs. His opinion of his minions eager credulity is higher than anyone ever thought possible.

" ... The general didn’t have tears in his eyes. But he did offer Donald Trump a fawning appraisal of the way he handled the fallout after his disgusting “Access Hollywood” comments were first made public.

At least, that’s according to Trump’s telling of the tale at a New York Young Republican Club gala on Saturday.

Trump, who told tens of thousands of lies during his time in office, related the story of a conveniently unnamed general who ― per Trump, anyway ― couldn’t get enough of Trump’s bravery after his “grab ’em by the pussy” comments, which he made in a 2005 “Access Hollywood” tape, were unearthed ahead of the 2016 election.

Trump at the gala recalled being urged to drop out of the race over the scandal, but said he pulled it back at a presidential debate with Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. ... "

“I went onto that [debate] stage just a few days later, and a general, who’s a fantastic general, actually said to me, ‘Sir, I’ve been on the battlefield, men have gone down on my left and on my right, I stood on hills where soldiers were killed, but I believe the bravest thing I’ve ever seen was the night you went onto that stage with Hillary Clinton after what happened, and then that woman asked you the first question about it, and [you] said ‘locker room talk.’”

“It’s locker room talk. What the hell? What are you talking about? Locker room talk,” Trump remembered saying.


https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1733693404931125274?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1733693404931125274%7Ctwgr%5E17fd4d0
5c4986894a2013ac12495dbbc3485709f%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffpost.com%2Fentry%2Fdonald-trump-general-story-access-hollywood_n_6576b446e4b09724b434b9c6


"Abe Lincoln told me ... 'Sir, you're the best ever! Keep the nothing-burgers coming!' ... not many people know that."
Who even bothers to make this stufff up? That woul... (show quote)

Trump is hoping that enough decent, thoughtful and sentient voters will die laughing at him before the election that he can win.
Go to
Dec 12, 2023 11:39:38   #
travelwp wrote:
WRONG, you Do CARE because you posted several different times to something you claim you don't care about !!!


I need to keep reminding you because you keep trying to change the subject while you sneak away for the real issue which is your untruthful response to Thom and your instance on not posting any links to evidence that would establish the predicate for your question. Remember now?

Do you not know how to post a link? Or are you so arrogant that you believe that everyone must admit that any thing you say is true and not to be questioned?

Stupid or arrogant. That is the question.
Go to
Dec 12, 2023 01:55:05   #
travelwp wrote:
Since you did not put the question into google, I can only conclude that you don't care for an explanation and are merely trolling.


And since you did not provide your own evidence (which might hace legitimized your question) I can only onclude that you are too lazy or too stupid to do so. No one has an obligation to chase down your your fantasies. As previouly stated, I don't even care about your question.

And since you are running away from yoour response to Thom (my only issue here) I can only conclude that deciet was your purpose.
Go to
Dec 11, 2023 07:53:12   #
travelwp wrote:
The question was: "Why did China pay millions of dollars to Hunter Biden?"

1. Thom didn't answer the question, so the rating was valid.
2. You, Mr Bazbo, apparently also need clarification.
3. Biden has been accused of not paying taxes on the China money. Articles only guess as to why Hunter received the money, so it's a valid question. The best guess is: To seek favor with Hunter's father

Put the question into google and tell me you still don't understand the question.
The question was: "Why did China pay million... (show quote)


And you are complaining about snark? There is nothing in my answer that would lead anyone that can read to conclude that I did not understand the question. It is your respnse to Thom that is off the rails--his response was not snarky and did not reference Trump. Read it again and get someone to help you this time.

My criticism about your response to Thom stands. You provided no evidentiary basis for your question. Even now you have provided only an opinion, which may surprise you to learn is not evidence.

And BTW, I am not going yo let you change the subject becuse I an indifferent to whatever has you riled up about Hunter Biden. My sole issue is that your reponse to Thom ws lazy and untruthful, which any one with the
sense that God gave a goose can plainly see.
Go to
Dec 10, 2023 12:18:08   #
travelwp wrote:
your reply rating is: -1 Didn’t answer the question


Value of reply
1 Answered the question.
-1 Didn’t answer the question
-1 Diverted topic to Trump
-1 Made snarky remark


Thom's response to you was not about Trump nor was it snarky. You ave not established yoour predicate and he was just seeking clarification.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 754 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.