Posts for: Patw28
May 13, 2018 18:25:16 #
May 9, 2018 22:49:04 #
Ok, Frank!
I look forward to meeting you.
All days look pretty much the same to me now so, at your convenience.
I look forward to meeting you.
All days look pretty much the same to me now so, at your convenience.
May 9, 2018 15:35:39 #
yes. $225 each.
It would be great if you could pick up as you could check out the FX and DX accessories also. A lot of the stuff I could just give you as it's just too much of a hassle to peddle individually.
I'm in Port Jervis. Ph 845-856-5418, Patrick.
It would be great if you could pick up as you could check out the FX and DX accessories also. A lot of the stuff I could just give you as it's just too much of a hassle to peddle individually.
I'm in Port Jervis. Ph 845-856-5418, Patrick.
May 4, 2018 06:31:11 #
CindyHouk wrote:
Hi everyone -- I am thinking about upgrading from ... (show quote)
Best bang for the buck? D7100!
Apr 26, 2018 08:28:10 #
DirtFarmer wrote:
So you're just overlaying the same image without shifting the focus? Not really sure just what you expect to happen.
Noise reduction?
Apr 20, 2018 19:50:36 #
This is the DX equivalent of the FX "nifty fifty" lens.
f1.8! for those dark night club shots.
Like new. $135.00
Free Shipping
f1.8! for those dark night club shots.
Like new. $135.00
Free Shipping
Apr 19, 2018 14:29:59 #
$220
Apr 19, 2018 07:04:29 #
Bid received on the 50mm lens. Conditionally removed from the offered list.
Apr 18, 2018 21:42:32 #
Rokinon 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF LENS. $155.00
Sigma 17-35mm f2.8 D EX $175.00
Bid received. Conditionally removed from offer. Nikon 50mm f1.8G $165.00
Nikon FX 28-200mm f3.5 D. $230.00
Rokinon 85mm f1.4 $275.00
Free Shipping on all.
PayPal preferred
patw28@gmail.com
Sigma 17-35mm f2.8 D EX $175.00
Bid received. Conditionally removed from offer. Nikon 50mm f1.8G $165.00
Nikon FX 28-200mm f3.5 D. $230.00
Rokinon 85mm f1.4 $275.00
Free Shipping on all.
PayPal preferred
patw28@gmail.com
Apr 18, 2018 07:05:03 #
Saildog83 wrote:
In Orvieto Italy
Planning on bringing my:
Tokina 11-16 f2.8 AT-X 116 PRO DX 11
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon EF 24-70 F/2.8 L II USM
Tripod ??
Please let me know if this is a good set up?
Thanks,
SD83
Planning on bringing my:
Tokina 11-16 f2.8 AT-X 116 PRO DX 11
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon EF 24-70 F/2.8 L II USM
Tripod ??
Please let me know if this is a good set up?
Thanks,
SD83
Don't!
Take a single piece of photo gear: a full performance bridge camera like the Panasonic Lumix FX1000.
Apr 14, 2018 07:46:01 #
Age 89. Selling off all DSL gear at sacrificial pricing.
$655.00
$655.00
Mar 27, 2018 06:22:12 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Great use of color! 
! ! ! 😉
Mar 24, 2018 19:24:21 #
Nikon 20mm G F1.8 AF-S N ED
Prestine condition.
$620 plus $12.00 postage
Prestine condition.
$620 plus $12.00 postage
Mar 17, 2018 08:19:57 #
edupen wrote:
I have Nikon 5300, what would be a good Alt wide angle lens if I could get one?
Just a side comment that some DX camera owners apparently do not consider: When you use an Fx lens in your DX camera, you do, indeed get an effective increase in your focus distance BUT you also suffer an equal increase in your f-stop by the same amount (roughly half an f-stop) gbecause you are only using a portion of the lens with its light gathering area.
Mar 7, 2018 09:18:36 #
Good response, Gene! I chose an off- white painted wall as my target. While not gray-card, it s a uniform, simple pattern for a comparative test.
I had tested the FZ1000 exposure performance against my D750 before I started off loading all my Nikon gear.
I used area (matrix) metering for an averaging reading off a uniform density target.
I made comparisons at various exposure settings. Since I was concerned with the higher ISO performance of the D3000, used the settings of 1/100 f4 ISO 1600 EC=0 on both cameras.
I had kept the D3000 with one zoom lens to serve as a loaner when helping a newbie try a DSL camera. The test satisfied me that this would be a bad camera for that purpose and that I could not sell it as is.
Hence, is the camera reasonably reparable? (No). I apparently failed to explain what I was trying to do and how I was going about it as I received several doltish replies and a couple of sarcastic trolls which have no place on UHH.
Again, thanks for your concern and constructive response.
I had tested the FZ1000 exposure performance against my D750 before I started off loading all my Nikon gear.
I used area (matrix) metering for an averaging reading off a uniform density target.
I made comparisons at various exposure settings. Since I was concerned with the higher ISO performance of the D3000, used the settings of 1/100 f4 ISO 1600 EC=0 on both cameras.
I had kept the D3000 with one zoom lens to serve as a loaner when helping a newbie try a DSL camera. The test satisfied me that this would be a bad camera for that purpose and that I could not sell it as is.
Hence, is the camera reasonably reparable? (No). I apparently failed to explain what I was trying to do and how I was going about it as I received several doltish replies and a couple of sarcastic trolls which have no place on UHH.
Again, thanks for your concern and constructive response.