Posts for: timcc
Feb 14, 2018 21:57:13 #
I've traveled extensively with the Sony a6000, and love it. I prefer a camera with inter-changeable lenses, especially a wide-angle zoom as a walk-around (I have a 16-70mm) and 1.8-2.8 primes for indoor and other low-light shooting.
The body weighs only 12 oz, but is not weather-resistant (the a6300 weighs a couple ounces more, has even better focusing, and is weather-resistant). As with most ILCs, the weight is usually in the lenses, so that is where care must be exercised for travel.
The body weighs only 12 oz, but is not weather-resistant (the a6300 weighs a couple ounces more, has even better focusing, and is weather-resistant). As with most ILCs, the weight is usually in the lenses, so that is where care must be exercised for travel.
Feb 14, 2018 12:36:51 #
BebuLamar wrote:
Among the UHH members who started out using manual mode either by choice or because that was the only mode that was available at the time. How long did it take you to learn how to use it?
Among those who started out with one of the auto mode (full Auto, P, A or S) how long did it take you to learn how to use the camera in manual?
I am not Chris T but I can still ask survey question can I?
Among those who started out with one of the auto mode (full Auto, P, A or S) how long did it take you to learn how to use the camera in manual?
I am not Chris T but I can still ask survey question can I?
I used A and P on my new Sony NEX C3 years ago until I'd figured out all (or at least most) of the menu options. I used the auto modes for about a year, mostly on travel, then when I retired I went cold-turkey into M, RAW, and Capture One converter all at once. Learning M did not take long, maybe a couple weeks of weekend practice and customizing the buttons to speed up the process -- and it became the only mode I use. The PP program took longer, and in fact is still a work in progress as the software gets upgraded.
Now have an a6000 and feel I'm getting the most out of it -- and having more fun being more creative and in control. If I get a lousy shot, which often happens, I know it was my own doing and try to learn from it. All is good.
Feb 7, 2018 09:29:55 #
Feb 7, 2018 09:18:00 #
For the kinds of shots you want to take I suggest an APS-C and inter-changeable lenses for IQ and flexibility, and for light weight a mirrorless camera.
I've used the Sony a6000 for several years and found it perfect for traveling and hiking. I shoot lots of landscape, nature, and urban settings, including indoors without a flash. A new body costs under $500, leaving money in your budget for buying excellent lenses. I have the Zeiss 16-70, Sony 55-210, and Sony 35 and 12 mm primes. They cover all my needs, and may meet yours as well, for around $2000 total.
If your budget allows, the more recent versions -- the a6300 and a6500 -- offer more focusing points and in-body stabilization (a6500). The kits are under $2000 new.
Good luck!
I've used the Sony a6000 for several years and found it perfect for traveling and hiking. I shoot lots of landscape, nature, and urban settings, including indoors without a flash. A new body costs under $500, leaving money in your budget for buying excellent lenses. I have the Zeiss 16-70, Sony 55-210, and Sony 35 and 12 mm primes. They cover all my needs, and may meet yours as well, for around $2000 total.
If your budget allows, the more recent versions -- the a6300 and a6500 -- offer more focusing points and in-body stabilization (a6500). The kits are under $2000 new.
Good luck!
Feb 7, 2018 08:52:19 #
Chihuahua, if you're shooting in Mexico.
Feb 7, 2018 08:49:02 #
mas24 wrote:
Funny. Putin does have a Superbowl Ring, that he stole right from the hands of owner Mr. Kraft. Kraft had it replaced. Don't know if Kraft paid for it, or the NFL. Beware! Never hand over anything valuable to Mr. Putin. He has quick hands and large pockets. And leaves rather quickly afterwards.
I hear from a reliable source (Steele, I think his name is) that Putin was behind the theft of Brady's game jersey in the previous Super Bowl. Or maybe it was actually Trump, come to think of it.
Ah yes, the source now confirms that Trump and Putin colluded in stealing the jersey. So there WAS collusion after all!
Makes sense in light of the past year's shenanigans.
Feb 5, 2018 08:19:54 #
Nice shots. I love Woodstock -- a very picturesque little town! I grew up skiing at Suicide Six.
Feb 5, 2018 08:11:33 #
tamalama wrote:
Hi there! I just wanted to share with you some of my recent silhouette pictures that I took. I take a lot actually, due to the fact that most of the pictures I take are of the sunsets and sunrises. This first picture is of a sunrise in AZ. Would somebody tell me if those clouds would be considered backlit? I never thought about it before.
The second picture is of a beautiful sunset in AZ.
The second picture is of a beautiful sunset in AZ.
Very nice sunset shots! Not sure whether the clouds are "backlit" or just "under-lit" (if there is such a word), but the effect is dramatic and definitely adds interest and depth to the photo.
Welcome to UHH!
Feb 4, 2018 15:52:38 #
NelsonARowe wrote:
I recently purchased a a6000 and this is my first ... (show quote)
Welcome to UHH! You made a good choice, and either the Busch or Friedman book will serve you well. I also found the free, more-detailed manual available from Sony online to be useful, and printed it out.
Re the OP, the few Sony support problems I've heard about mostly involved waiting for parts for a new A7xxx or a DSLR. The A6xxx series, while not trouble-free, seems to be pretty reliable and rarely in need of servicing. My experience with a NEX camera and an a6000 over the past 8 years has been service-free, and I personally would not spend the extra money on an extended warranty. Just my 2 cents worth.
Enjoy your camera!
Feb 4, 2018 15:28:01 #
I was lucky enough to go to the South Pole some years ago. It was a balmy -50 degrees.
Took a small Sony P&S, which I put in a zip-lock bag before going inside (it was too cold to leave the camera outside overnight). It took quite a while to warm up to room temperature, but was ready to re-charge after about 4-5 hours.
Flew back to New Zealand in the back of a cold C-130, but made sure to bag the camera before disembarking into the NZ summer weather.
I'm told that waterproof bags sold in camping stores will also serve this purpose -- and are more durable than plastic bags.
Took a small Sony P&S, which I put in a zip-lock bag before going inside (it was too cold to leave the camera outside overnight). It took quite a while to warm up to room temperature, but was ready to re-charge after about 4-5 hours.
Flew back to New Zealand in the back of a cold C-130, but made sure to bag the camera before disembarking into the NZ summer weather.
I'm told that waterproof bags sold in camping stores will also serve this purpose -- and are more durable than plastic bags.
Feb 4, 2018 14:48:39 #
OddJobber wrote:
But Iz came close. 
I don't think selfies count . . .
Feb 3, 2018 15:06:34 #
I agree with those who suggest researching the cathedrals you plan to visit beforehand for any restrictions re photography.
As a general rule, do not plan on using either a flash or a tripod. In my experience, most cathedrals and museums bar either or both.
I've found that a super-wide angle (10-16 or so) is very useful for interiors (as well as narrow streets and alleys). If the lens is fast enough, you can usually brace yourself against a column, pew, or whatever is handy to minimize shake. They can be expensive -- you may want to rent one for the trip. With a super-wide angle you can expect some key stoning (leaning verticals), but if you shoot wide enough, they can be corrected in post processing without losing the features you want to capture.
As a general rule, do not plan on using either a flash or a tripod. In my experience, most cathedrals and museums bar either or both.
I've found that a super-wide angle (10-16 or so) is very useful for interiors (as well as narrow streets and alleys). If the lens is fast enough, you can usually brace yourself against a column, pew, or whatever is handy to minimize shake. They can be expensive -- you may want to rent one for the trip. With a super-wide angle you can expect some key stoning (leaning verticals), but if you shoot wide enough, they can be corrected in post processing without losing the features you want to capture.
Feb 1, 2018 14:12:12 #
digit-up wrote:
Can anyone make an argument "for or against" shooting RAW. Any caveats? Big files I know, but what else. I'm new...and very OLD at this. RJM
The only caveats are a commitment of time and possible expense. You have to post-process RAW, so you will need to take the time and effort necessary to learn how to use a PP software program, and then plan to spend a lot more time on your computer creating the images you want. The dollar expense will depend on which PP program you decide to use -- they range from free to several hundred dollars and vary in their capabilities.
That said, RAW is the only way to go if you want to get the most out of your photography, for the reasons stated in previous responses. Some people hate sitting in front of a computer, and for them JPEG is probably more appropriate since the camera does most or all of the processing. But I think most of us on this forum get considerable pleasure from applying our creative juices on the RAW images in post.
Jan 25, 2018 18:19:06 #
boberic wrote:
I know everything about photography. I am enclosing this photo as evidence of my mastery of the craft.
Looks perfect to me. I think you've successfully drained the photography swamp!
Time to move on to a new hobby??
Jan 25, 2018 10:32:05 #
canon Lee wrote:
Take me for an example.... Ive been shooting professionally, ( I have clients that pay me. Its my PROfession), for a very long time, that being said, I don't know it all, and run across situations that are new to me and it forces me to update my understanding of photography. There are those here that seem to know everything, and yet from their comments its apparent that there is yet more room for learning.
With the rapid changes in technology, endless varieties of subject matter, and no boundaries for improving composition and artistic skills, we all have lots to learn if we keep an open mind.
Being relatively new to UHH, I'm not sure who's considered a "know it all," but I have to say that some of the more spirited debates (arguments?) I've read here have been the most useful from a learning standpoint. A couple of yesterday's posts were a good example - lengthy, somewhat contentious, but very educational for me.
And many of the debates have been quite entertaining -- and often show good humor on the part of members.
It's when some members become less than civil and start attacking each other personally that the learning stops and the forum slips into the gutter. If we can't get rid of that crankiness altogether, I hope we can at least keep it to a minimum.