Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bazbo
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 754 next>>
Feb 24, 2024 15:00:31   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Exactly How is IVF being threatened?

Simple. If according to the Alabama Supreme Court frozen embryos are children the disposing them (a routine part of IVF)this would be homicide. Note the three Alabama IVF clinics have suspended their operations because of these legal questions.
Go to
Feb 24, 2024 14:48:48   #
NOBODY ever said an embryo was a human being did they?

Dennis[/quote]

Dennis, the Alabama Supreme Court just said exactly that--at least as far as Alabama law is concerned. Do try to keep up.

I'll bet that the "life begins at conception" crowd never imagined that they're single minded zealotry would lead to IVF being threatened. But then, zealots rarely think things through do they?

The life begins at conception doctrine is a binary choice- it either does or doesn't. If it does then we can say goodbye to IVF and if it doesn't, the zealots have some 'spainin' to do. I, for one, am looking forward to either the logic pretzels these people will have to use to explain this away or watching them turn their vitriol on Trump and all the other Republicans who are trying to walk away from this. Either way this issue is a stone cold loser fpr the Right in November.
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 13:56:47   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Where is your evidence that was the reasoning she didn’t provide DNA evidence?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/feb/15/trump-e-jean-carroll-defamation-lawsuit-dna
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 13:48:59   #
dennis2146 wrote:
little baz you could not trigger a toaster to work properly. That comment is used only so you can try your best to think you have made some change in me of a negative nature. Try harder next time little one. I look at every one of you on the lying corrupt Left as nothing but CLOWNS with lil tex as the most CLOWN type of all, talking nothing but cutesy little bullshit but saying nothing at all worthwhile. You are close to the same CLOWN behavior. You have never said anything truthful here and I suspect you fled to Portugal to get away from the police chasing you for some nefarious reason. You tell us you are an attorney but I have dealt with any number of attorneys and you just don't have the wit for it. Here's PROOF of your inadequacy to post anything that would trigger me except complete laughter. Take a good look at your post. Who proof read it for you, little denny? Allow me to post some of the highlights of your illiteracy mr. attorney.

Awww....did I trigger you gain? What does the word gain mean as used by you? Did you mean, again?

it does not make a wet fart's worth a dofferece what you or your auther or any of the other MAGA thugs think. What does, worth a dofferece, mean? Did you mean, worth a difference? What does the word, auther, mean? Did you mean, author?

Do you see what I mean little baz? If you are truly an attorney you must be going out of business or are on your last legs. You could not possibly write like this and still be in most any kind of business. How do you ever convey thoughts and meanings to others? Pretty much an impossible task isn't it with your obvious illiteracy.

Thanks for the 60 second Comedy Club tour but I am afraid lil tex has the CLOWN position all sewn up.

Dennis
little baz you could not trigger a toaster to work... (show quote)


My response to you did not contain it a single insult or personal comment. Yet you respond immediately with insults and personal invective.

Yes I would say you were triggered.And unstable. And insecure. And you're completely incapable of civil discourse.


I guess you were just not smart enough to realize that when I respond to you in a completely neutral and non insulting way I do so just to watch you explode, thus supporting my assertion in the above paragraph. You have turned yourself into a cartoon, Dennis and I really enjoy exposing it from time to time.
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 13:28:07   #
scooter1 wrote:
She is scum. Lying scum.


And you are the one lecturing to Triple G about the difference between opinion in fact?

Hilarious.
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 13:22:56   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Did you also realize that the accuser refuse to provide DNA evidence from the so-called dress? Why would she do that?

Because Trump's attorneys missed the deadline for introducing that is evidence, just like they forgot to fill in the paperwork requesting a jury trial.
Go to
Feb 1, 2024 08:17:04   #
dennis2146 wrote:
NOBODY ever said it was nonconsensual to what he was referring. You want to compare nonconsensual then talk to Biden and Tara Reid. But you on the Left dismiss her complaint as never happened. She says it did. Many women on the Left have come right and said a woman should be believed. That must be ONLY 100% Left Wing supporting women. Those with complaints against Left Wingers are not to be believed apparently. Does your hypocrisy, lies and corruption ever end? Is it always just running your mouth as a CLOWN with you little tex tex?

Dennis
NOBODY ever said it was nonconsensual to what he w... (show quote)


The plaintiff has has said that this particular incient was non consensual. This was established in court as a fact. And Trump continued tp defame her through his lies and insults (intesting that you are always complaiing about left wing lies while supporting a well documented liar--also adjudicated in court).
Go to
Feb 1, 2024 07:52:51   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Apparently you missed the POINT of the link. This vile POS corrupt woman has maligned a number of men, not only President Trump. It seems the corrupt Judge would not allow Trump's attorneys to bring up these OTHER men that would prove the woman is most likely lying about every one of them in order to reach into deep pockets of Trump. Now you tell us you are an attorney though I have never seen any evidence of anything legal you might know about. But in your bestest attorney viewpoint and not a lying corrupt Left Winger out to GET Trump, are you really not able to see this woman is a scammer? Do you not see that?

Dennis
Apparently you missed the POINT of the link. This... (show quote)


Awww....did I trigger you gain? Something as simple as an observation (an accurate one at that) that
runs counter to your Trump Town fantasies causes you to fall apart and retreat to your junior high school self? Poor thing.

Here is another accurate observation: it does not make a wet fart's worth a dofferece what you or your auther or any of the other MAGA thugs think. A jury has spoken and Trump is on the hook.

Get your checkbooks out, chumps. Appeals are expensive. This self proclaimed billionaire needs your help.
Go to
Jan 31, 2024 11:13:57   #
dennis2146 wrote:
https://tr.roccistuccishow.com/ga/click/2-43873531-382-119706-239620-2630994-8ac11ae55b-9hc2b58c61

Dennis


The question is not how many times has she been raped big rather how many times has she been defamed. I thought this was obvious.
Go to
Jan 17, 2024 06:49:41   #
Effate wrote:
I am certainly not suggesting all of the officers should have been at the point of entry as the three that were there did nothing. The point is all about training and preparation and is wholly relevant to the response. Like I stated earlier there appeared to be no central command directing an effective defense. The public should have never been allowed to breech. The response should have been out front organized with skirmish lines and arrest teams immediately arresting and removing those most aggressive and inciting. Every lawsuit against law enforcement is always going to have a cause of action for failure to train or behavior outside the scope of training. Every after action report or debriefing is going to critique training and I guarantee you that shooting investigation definitely had discussion relative to training or lack thereof. Training is always relevant.
I am certainly not suggesting all of the officers ... (show quote)


I never said the training was a irrelevant. Re-read my response to you.

Is your argument that if deadly force had been used outside the building it wouldn't have been necessary outside speakers lobby?

That argument not withstanding, what should a well trained force have done at that time and place? Confronted with a mob breaking down doors and windows attempting to access the house chamber while members of the house were still there trying to evacuate? Gentle persuasion? Harsh language? Stand aside and let this mob attack members of Congress? Or was deadly force justified at that time and in the place?
Go to
Jan 17, 2024 03:38:59   #
Effate wrote:
I conceded she put herself in the situation which ultimately led to her demise but you too saw much tape and you saw some officers in the fight while others seemed to be escorting the shaman around while others were passive and seemingly no central control/command. Based on my experience in riot situations I am convinced there was clearly training and planning deficiencies. Anyone who can’t come to that conclusion is asking for similar scenarios in the future. It was reported that yesterday pro Palestinian protesters tore down a portion of the Capitol fence. No reported arrests, go figure.
I conceded she put herself in the situation which ... (show quote)


Your examples appear OK to assume that the entire contingent of law-enforcement should've been concentrated at the point of Ashley's for each that seems to be ridiculous on its face.

Also I am not aware of the pro Palestinian protesters had breached the capital building and were threatening members of Congress do use of deadly force into situations would've been completely inappropriate so you're comparing apples and oranges.

I have already said that I have no opinion about the quality of the officer training. When you keep coming back that subject you're making an an irrelevant response to my argument. After all, it wasn't for officer training that caused Ashli to preach the barricade was it?
Go to
Jan 15, 2024 16:11:35   #
Effate wrote:
I am under no illusion that Babbitt was any kind of hero and she ultimately chose to inject herself into that scenario. You know as well as I that the agency investigating these shootings, absent heavy public scrutiny, are going to protect the officer and even the courts allow great deference towards officers in these situations. That being said, while working fugitives, narcotics and special investigations I was in several situations where a bad guy was actually armed and I was able to prevent what would have clearly been a good shoot. As was pointed out this guy, as many of the shootings that are scrutinized via cam footage, was scared shitless and over reacted. Looking at the conduct of many officers, and things may have changed, this agency showed little signs of adequate training. They were building guards, not cops.
I am under no illusion that Babbitt was any kind o... (show quote)


I'm willing to hazard a guess that you have seen no more video of this incident then I have. And a few seconds of video does not make anyone an expert on what actually happened. And if you have not read the actual report of the investigation you should before youforn am opinion opinion about whether or not it's biased. You have presupposed that the report is a cover-up and this is based only on your existing belief--not real evidence.

Also I have no opinion on the quality of the training of the officers involved but we do know this: if she had not attempted to crawl through the broken window to gain access to the Speaker and other members of Congress she would in all likelihood still be alive--although she probably would be in prison which is where she would belong Head she survived.
Go to
Jan 15, 2024 14:25:09   #
Kraken wrote:
We sure have a variety of sick people in the attic.


Those that believe that she was a national hero or was an innocent little snowflake who just got lost on her way to the gift shop are proof positive that you can't fact check a myth. It's funny how these right wing law and order Super patriots get all squishy on the subject when it comes to J6.

I provided a link to the results of the actual investigation and these folks think they know more (based on a few seconds of video) than the actual investigators who had access to the real evidence.

One of the hallmarks of our system of government is the time honored tradditiioon of the peaceful transfer of power. Those who tried to interfere with that transfer a in an attempt to overturn a a lawful election are themselves traders.
Go to
Jan 15, 2024 02:31:59   #
Truth Seeker wrote:
Ashli Babbit was murdered in cold blood and is a national hero!

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/department-justice-closes-investigation-death-ashli-babbitt

If she were black and shot by law-enforcement for attempting to loot a Walmart I'm sure you would be fine with it right?

Just by being there she had already violated several laws. And by ignoring law-enforcement orders and attempting to breach the barrier she became a threat to both law-enforcement and to members of Congress. The use of deadly force by law enforcement was entirely justified.

She was both a traitor and an idiot.
Go to
Jan 13, 2024 10:12:51   #
LinksUp wrote:
https://nypost.com/2024/01/08/news/trump-co-defendant-alleges-improper-relationship-between-georgia-da-and-prosecutor-demands-indictment-be-thrown-out/

Wow. Whatever the Demoturds accuse the Trump of, they are doing themselves.


Your comment doesn't quite match your article. For example when you say "whatever", do you think that the fake elector scheme was hatched by the Democrats to overturn an election they had won? Or was it a voice actor who called the Georgia Secretary of State to pressure him to find votes that weren't there ? Were January 6 rioters all Democrats? I could go on and on, but I trust you take my point.

And does this have anything at all to do with your source?

See if you can respond without insult her name-calling.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 754 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.