BS!

Gaetz's appeal for funding came two days after he — and 200 other Republicans — voted against a stopgap measure that sought to fund the government through December. Among other provisions, the bill also gave $18.8 billion to FEMA's disaster relief fund, $12 billion in aid for Ukraine, and $112 million to beef up security at federal courts.

Like I said... EVERY bill has "pork" in it.

I see nothing wrong with the "pork" listed in this bill so far.


You don't want to help Americans who experience disasters such as a cat 4 hurricane?
You don't want to beef up security at federal courts... or would you rather see a mini-jan 6?
You don't want to help Ukraine? You would rather a dictator buddy of Chump would invade a neighbor for political reasons?

Your post reads, in part: ”. . . There is NO EVIDENCE that Hillary had INTENT to deceive the FBI . . . “

That does not square with the destruction of devices (hard drives, phones, &c.) that occurred!

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/05/hillary-clinton-email-device-destuction-nr-sot.cnn
~~~~~

From the FBI records vault — the FBI report:
FBI REPORT: https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
~~~~~

The public report of the FBI (Press Release) — by Director Comey — concluded there was insufficient evidence of INTENT TO DECEIVE, and so reported to the DOJ:

Statement by FBI Director Comey — https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail. . .”

“. . . Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”

“. . . With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. . .”

“. . . We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. . .”

“. . . She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account. . .”

“. . . Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. . . There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. . .”

“. . . In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.”

Please note, SPECIFICALLY:
”All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice.” [Emphasis added — wyantry]

The evidence revealed thus far in Trump’s affair, supports allegations there WAS “clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct . . . or efforts to obstruct justice.”

At least from what has been revealed so far.

Things are not looking good for the orange fuhrer of idiots at the moment.

Less than a month ago, he gave $3 Million Dollars to a high priced lawyer to defend him in his Mar a Lago lawsuit against the FBI.

In less than a month, the orange fuhrer of idiots BENCHED this lawyer..... oops! there goes $3 Million dollars of supporters money - out the window!


The Special Master gave the orange fuhrer of idiots one week to get the 11,000 pages of "stolen documents" digitized.

Yesterday, the orange fuhrer of idiots hid his tail between his legs and told the Special Master that his team could NOT find a company willing to work for him to digitize said documents.... and they went to at least FIVE companies known for doing this type of work.

Any ideas why FIVE similar companies would refuse to work for the orange fuhrer of idiots?

So now, the DOJ will work with one of those FIVE companies (that refused to work with the orange fuhrer of idiots) to digitize these documents AND they will bill the orange fuhrer of idiots which, this time, he will have to pay.

The Special Master told the orange fuhrer of idiots to: PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

Being that he can't PUT UP, it looks like the orange fuhrer of idiots just might have to 1. Plead the 5th (as he has become so fond of doing recently) or 2. Drop the petition.

Either way..... LOSER! His lies are starting to come around full circle.

Karma baby, Karma!