I'm not sure if this is the correct place for these so please let me know if it's not. Linda's challenge the other day kind of rejuvenated my creative juices again and made me go back and revisit some images I have done in the past using, either Photoshop, or my IPhone. Doing edits on my IPhone is a way of challenging myself to see what I can come up with. Some of these images were created using both programs. Maybe starting out on my phone and finishing in Photoshop or vice versa. Some of the Phone apps that I use are:
1. Snapseed. My favorite go to app on my phone.
2. Photoshop Mix: My go to app when I am going to be doing composites on my phone.
3. Distressed FX: For texture layers, effects, etc.
4. Super Impose for blending images, effects, etc.
5. Over for Text
6. Photoshop and NIK plugins.

I use several other phone apps but these are the main ones.

...anybody made their own DIY scrim? I'm going to, but am researching first. Design is important (but I can cobble together almost anything, having decades of carpenter skills and a small shop) but the main thing is: actual diffusion material for the panel itself. I want to direct a couple of LED multi-temperature lites through maybe a 3'x4' panel. Idea is to shoot *down* through this thing with the camera suspended (through a hole in the scrim)...I've got most of the engineering figured out, but the material thing is still the cork in the bottle. ;0)

I'd like to hear some thoughts from people who actually still shoot film. Why? Possible answers I can thing of would include, "I simply enjoy working in a darkroom making prints," I can't duplicate the swings, tilts and shifts of my large format camera with any digital offering," "I find that projected slides look a lot better to me than projected digital."

For most people, including myself, using film means scanning it to convert to digital, which degrades the quality of the image a bit, including for printing, so I don't see the point.

I'm in the process of scanning thousands of negatives and slides. I'm using an Epson V800 flatbed scanner and my Nikon D810 with a 55mm f/2.8 macro lens when I want a bit more detail from a photo. (I can easily see the difference in detail.) I can't afford a super expensive scanner, but I suspect that the camera/lens combo is going to give pretty close results. In any case, I wouldn't ever start with film again, especially not when I own such a fine digital camera. The results out of the camera blow away any film I've ever taken. My opinion.

Two suggestions that I personally feel would improve your effort, both on this image, and one that you posted previously are . . .
1) Your background seems too sharp and as a result draws attention away from your "bouquet".
2) The edges of some of the cut-out are not smooth and unnatural looking. Two things you might try to correct this would be to use the "blur" tool on the edge, or select the cut-out then "modify/feather" . . . trying different amounts of feathering (1, 2, 3, 4, etc pixels)

Here are two examples of that which I am suggesting. Both have the background blurred with Gaussian blur at .7 %

First I cut out the flowers. On the first I selected the edge of the flowers and then went to (in PS) "Select" then "Modify" then "Feather" and set it at 4 pixels.

On the second I simply went around the edges of the flower with a very small brush using the Blur Tool.

They would be better if starting with the original, but thought I would show you my suggestions for your consideration. Jut keep playing with it, starting from scratch with each effort until you get what you really love.