People some facts.
Science and the ideal gas law proved Brady did not cheat
The courts did not decide whether Brady cheated or not. The court decisions had nothing to do what so ever with air in footballs. The court decisions were about rule 46 and the commissioners authority under the CBA.
Brady's success is a function of his line and their ability to protect him? Do you even watch football? He has arguabley one of the weakest lines in Football. His ability to throw for 400 yards is a result of getting rid of the ball in 2.1 seconds on average the second fastest in the NFL.
To the poster who says he can name 20 better. Name them. Name 10. I am about the same age I would love to hear this list. Football experts and coaches that have been around for a lot longer than you argue over 2 or 3 but you can name 20 or more?
Blanda and Unitas? Seriously you would have more credibility if you said Bart Star. Don't forget the great Earl Morril who led the undefeated Dolfins to the Super Bowl win.
If you don't like Brady just say so it's ok but to call him a cheater is not true just check the facts. Not a great qb check the facts. Not among the greatest of all time? 4 rings only one quarterback has more. So hate all you want but don't deny the facts

Thus far, some interesting comments. Some positive and some negative. Brady is tied with Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana with 4 Superbowl Rings. Troy Aikman of the Dallas Cowboys is in 2nd place all alone with 3 Superbowl Rings. Tom Brady has been in 6 Superbowls and lost 2 to Eli Manning of the New York Giants. Tom Brady is 39 years old and has at least 2 more years left to play if not injured. If Tom Brady wins one more Superbowl Ring, he will be in undisputed first place with 5 Rings. If he accomplishes that, the Sports Writers will most likely say he is the greatest ever. And Brady wants that title. He was once asked in the past, which of his 3 Superbowl Rings did he cherish the most? His reply. "The next one." Remember, I am not a Patriots fan. Thanks everyone.

There is no news on TV or in the newspaper anymore; only editorials and happenings filtered such that they tell the story the station / network wants to convey. I have been interviewed twice for news events. Both times the story as presented on TV was totally mis-represented -- to the point where I would say the newscaster lied. Never trust an interview you see on TV unless both the interviewer and interviewee are in the scene; otherwise they "cut and paste" questions and answers such that the story is what they want told. I can speak from experience on that.