Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: LARRYR.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 45 next>>
Mar 6, 2013 06:53:03   #
rook2c4 wrote:
We should retrieve it, then send Bush the bill. Bush is the reckless idiot that put all that stuff there in the first place. And I'm certain he has enough private funds to cover a good portion of the cost.


We better not wait to long to get rid of this stuff, because
as long as it takes Obama to make up his mind to do any
thing, it will cost us( the tax payers) tripple the amount
of money. By the way, it wasn't only Bush who wanted to
send troops over seas, don't forget your president OK'ed
them as well , as many of other DEMO'S did.
Go to
Mar 5, 2013 07:05:01   #
sarge69 wrote:
Don't even try to figure that one out.

Our government is trying to buy friendship and it's going to turn and bite them in the ass one day.

Sarge69


It already has, bitten us in the a**, look at who we have
as leaders in our goverment. Just how low can you bend
down with out falling ? Besides, it's only the taxpayers
money their giving away, I mean, it's not like their taking
it out of their banking acount or saving.
Shuck, after taxing the those rich people, I'm sure they
will find a way to squeeze more money out of us poor
old working people, like raising the retirement age to 75
or 80.
Go to
Mar 5, 2013 06:47:26   #
papayanirvana wrote:
I think he's referring to "Hanoi Jane" she was apparently against an unjust war...er conflict.

I think that makes her a patriot!


True, it does make her a PATRIOT, the problem
is for WHO, surely not for the U.S. I know because
I fought in that hell hole. I guess Johnny boy, Kerry
would most likely agree with you also. It may have
been an unjust war, but with her and John Kerry's
help, it didn't make our jobs any easier. As a Viet Nam
vet. I will never forget.
Go to
Mar 4, 2013 07:08:24   #
Danilo wrote:
Ratings suck...income declines...cut budget...ratings suck more...income declines more...cut budget more... ratings su...


My stomach is starting to hurt, it's good to be awaken
with a good laugh, thanks Danilo, who says the truth
doesn't hurt.

ratings su....

Go to
Mar 4, 2013 06:54:57   #
Gnslngr wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
This list of trash is only repeated on about 50 right wing web sites. Travelwp do you have any original thoughts?


Yup. It'd be nice if he attributed this piece of crap as well, but he posted it so people would think he wrote it himself. A fraud and a moron - how proud his mother must be. :thumbup:


Would you mind listing the ones that are false and place
a reason why they are false. I'm sure you could find at
lease one . You may have to watch the VIEW or Chris
Matthew give you a hand or listen to the liberial press.
Your answer wouldn't have to contain any truth in it,
if that would help you out.
Go to
Mar 1, 2013 10:44:45   #
RixPix wrote:
tlbuljac wrote:
truer words have yet to be spoken


This is about as true as that book those wacky christians follow.


Quoted from some one foolish no doubt, as usual.
Go to
Feb 22, 2013 17:02:09   #
Harvey wrote:
WOW - talk about "fanaticism" the 1,000,000s of people who believe the "Fantasy" in Genesis are truly blind to the B.S. that is threaded through it.
My point - carefully read about Adam, Eve & their family - when you are finished take this test - if Adam & Eve and their children were the first and only people on this earth - "WHO were the "Other People" their Daughter married? Common seance tells me there is an error here and if there is this one how many more are there in the Bible that is supposed to be blindly believed as truth.
Don't get me wrong I believe in a Loving Forgiving God - but not one of the Old Testament.
LARRYR. wrote:
gmw12 wrote:
A local politician here said he votes against abortion also in the case of rape "because the rape was god´s will"...

Others ask for creationism to be taught in schools.

Where does fanatism start?


Simple, Fanatism starts when you leave God out.
Now wasn't that simple.You see God doesn't only
provide your needs, but also the answer to your questions.
All you have to do is ask.
WOW - talk about "fanaticism" the 1,000,... (show quote)


If you Believe in a " Loving and forgiving God, but not the
one in the Old Testament, then you must believe in the
ONE in the New Testament. Which is both the same.
As far Cain's wife, the Bible goes from Genesis 4:16 into
Genesis 4:17 " The descendant of Cain. The Bible doesn't
mention any other woman other then Eve in the beginning,
but in 5:1 the Bible says that at the age of 130 years old
Adam and Eve had a son and the named him Seth. from
then on the Bible list the Descendants of Adam, not listing
any females. I'm sure with in those 130 plus years ( time
from Cane and Able's birth ) Adam and Eve had other children
( females) that werent listed, because what is shown in
the Old Testament was the blood line of Adam down through
the ages. Besides, no matter what I say will ever change your
mind,would it?
Go to
Feb 22, 2013 12:40:31   #
shagbat wrote:
There is no god she is a figment of american imagination.


Your right, in the minds of many Americans " SHE "
is a figment of their imagination. In my mind " He"
is for real.
Go to
Feb 22, 2013 10:22:02   #
gmw12 wrote:
A local politician here said he votes against abortion also in the case of rape "because the rape was god´s will"...

Others ask for creationism to be taught in schools.

Where does fanatism start?


Simple, Fanatism starts when you leave God out.
Now wasn't that simple.You see God doesn't only
provide your needs, but also the answer to your questions.
All you have to do is ask.
Go to
Feb 22, 2013 07:09:48   #
shagbat wrote:
Man made god, god did not make Man.
Islam was 'invented' 500 years after christianity and is behaving as christians did 500 years ago.

Also this letter is a spoof, I have seen so many like it, from some extreme right wing christian source, just ignore it.


A large majority of the people here in America( like you )
are ignoring it, as well as every thing else that has to do with facts. As for your statement" Man made god, God did not
make man" all I have to say is my Bible tells me that my
God made man, which I have proof, your here and I'm here.
Now if your statement is true, please could you show me proof
as to where is your god ?
Go to
Feb 22, 2013 06:54:43   #
Beautiful story, make me wonder just where we
as human being, went wrong. For many people these
days the life of an inocent child means so little.
And yet a brave mother dog, resk her on LIFE inorder
to safe her pups.
Go to
Feb 21, 2013 16:42:00   #
PNagy wrote:
JBTaylor wrote:
PNagy wrote:
handgunz wrote:
frank t said
Mattie, How do you feel about 4,486 Americans killed in Iraq in a war that was based upon the lies of Cheney and Bush?
That's what you should be outraged about.

How many of those were killed under obomba's watch? How many could have been prevented if he had not lied when he said the first thing he would do if elected was bring our troops home? Where is your putrage for that How about those that died in afghanistan and everywhere else obomba started another needless war, those are all under obomba. Where is your outrage over those. I can't wait till obomba is out of office so democrats will become anti war again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kr9ywEFRQkQ
frank t said br Mattie, How do you feel about 4,4... (show quote)


Yes, Obama is complicit for continuing the war as long as he did. Once the lies were told to start the war, new ones were needed to continue it. Usually this need not go beyond claiming that if we withdraw all sorts of chaos will follow. It is the Richard Nixon premature withdrawal argument.

The US oppression of Iraq is actually a multi-decade, bipartisan initiative. It began with the tricks Bush I used to have his war against Saddam Hussein, continued with Clinton's constant bombing of infrastructure, and murderous economic sanctions, exploded under Bush I into outright conquest, and subjected to procrastinating withdrawal under Obama. The entire sequence of events was nothing but an imperialistic assault on Iraq to control its oil.
quote=handgunz frank t said br Mattie, How do yo... (show quote)


I respect your consistency. I think you, like Dennis Kucinich, stay true to your position regardless of politics from what I have seen.

I have one question which may reveal my ignorance, how are the efforts to control Iraq's oil working out?
quote=PNagy quote=handgunz frank t said br Matt... (show quote)


Control of Iraqi oil was a total failure if we assume that the purpose was to help the American people. Under Bush the price at the pump quadruped over what it had been for most of the Clinton administration. However, the Busheviks did not want to profit the American people, only themselves. They took billions of dollars of profit for their pet corporations, like Halliburton, Chevron, Harken Engineering, etc, but allowed the Iraqi and American people to pay in blood and in economic misery.
quote=JBTaylor quote=PNagy quote=handgunz frank... (show quote)


So, what are Obama's reason for the price of fuel being
quadruped over Bush's prices? Yea right , looking out for the
people. What ever reason you should give, why does it only
pretain to the now sitting president and not to the former
one ? Aren't we still paying in blood with our troops in the
middle East?
Go to
Feb 21, 2013 16:27:48   #
Frank T wrote:
First let me say that I have no issue using drones to kill these dirtbags. Second, I think the argument that we shouldn't do it is disingenuous or at the very least lacking thought.
So let's take the typical case. We know that John Doe is meeting with Al Qaeda and planning an attack on the USA. What should we do?
1. Do nothing at all and let him continue his planning.
2. Send in a special ops group and capture him, even though that may result in American deaths?
3. Invade the country where he is hiding and start a full blown war, possibly killing numerous civilians and American soldiers.
4. Turn him into a fine red mist with a Hellfire Missile from an unmanned drone.
I vote for number 4 and I think the only reason the right is opposing these actions is because they didn't do it.
First let me say that I have no issue using drones... (show quote)


Obama used item 1 in the Fort Hood shooting, where I believe
he should have use part one of item 2, where the murderer
accomplished his plan using part 2 of item 3. Why wasnt
item 4 used, know one will ever know.
Go to
Feb 21, 2013 06:42:29   #
FredB wrote:
FLandWVMIKE wrote:
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
Dick Kantenberger - Gifted Education Writer - Examiner.com

Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That's right!
Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!
------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- -
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card br Dic... (show quote)
This is simply not true. ILLEGAL immigrants, (which is what I assume this person means, since unless your name is Sitting Bull, WE are all "immigrants"...) DO NOT, repeat DO NOT receive Social Security Benefits.

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/03/social-security-for-illegal-immigrants/

However, there is a great deal of confusion, hyped up and bandied about by both left-wing and right-wing commentators (who have a vested interest in keeping people all hysterical about it..ratings and all..).

Many "illegal" aliens have valid social security cards, and paid in to the system while they worked in this country, legally or not. Many became citizens, but many did not. Several years ago modifications to the Social Security laws were passed that allowed these "shadow" contributors to receive the benefits to which they were entitled as valid, tax-paying contributors to the system.

The number of these "shadow citizens" were quite small compared to the 40 or so million people receiving Social Security, and no sane person would ever suggest that the benefits they receive are in any way a strain on the system, since 90% of the people involved were in the lowest economic and social strata as it was. Mexican fruit pickers in the San Juaquin valley are not exactly living high off the hog from your taxes.

If right-wingers want to get pissed off about Social Security ripoffs, perhaps they would be better served by bitching about the moderately- and very-wealthy bloodsuckers who make 6- and 7-figure incomes but don't have to pay ANY social security tax on income over about $100,000. Thus, that raucous radio commentator pulling down four or five million a year pays the same amount in Social Security tax as a tenured PhD professor teaching at Harvard for 30 years who makes about $105,000. I have yet to hear Limbaugh or any else of his kind offer to pay MORE social security tax to help keep the system solvent past 2033.
quote=FLandWVMIKE History Lesson on Your Social S... (show quote)


By " Very wealthy blood suckers " do you mean both
the House and the Senate. Remember old Charlie R.
who just so happen to have forgotten to pay his fair
share of taxes.
Go to
Feb 20, 2013 10:31:26   #
FredB wrote:
Quote:
When you finally start to collect your SS benefit the gov't then taxes you again on it as an income! A scam is correct, that's why congress exempted themselves from having to participate.
Check your facts. Congress, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch (judges, etc) have been covered under, and paying into the system since 1984. Yeah, a late start, I'll admit, but they're in the boat just like us.


Spoken like a true POLITICIAN

Their in the boat just like us

Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 45 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.