Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bison Bud
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 57 next>>
Feb 18, 2024 08:31:30   #
Why do folks complain about posting a photo in the wrong section, when the new primary listing comes up with the sections mixed in the first place? Sure one can filter down to a specific section if they want to, but why criticize someone for posting in the wrong section when the start page is mixed up anyway? I guess some folks just aren't happy unless they have something to complain about!
Go to
Feb 16, 2024 09:21:00   #
dennis2146 wrote:
What an interesting post you submit. You say Trump did a great job while in office but find him self centered and self serving. I can't disagree with thinking he did a great job while in office. I have also posted here a number of times I would hate to work with him as my immediate supervisor. He not only fires someone but then badmouths that person afterward. Not a good supervisor trait in my opinion. But then again what President is perfect? For me Trump did a great job especially when he excelled at accomplishing things other Presidents never once tackled or talked about doing but never did anything. Talking a problem to death is the mainstay of politicians. Trump not only talked about issues such as North Korea and putting Jerusalem where it rightfully belongs but actually did these things. Other Presidents talked of putting up a wall on the Southern border. Trump did his best to put up a wall right up until the Left said he was a racist and decided a wall wasn't needed. Did Mexico pay for it? No they did not but on the other hand Trump worked with there Mexican government to achieve something the Left has never achieved, keeping asylum seekers in Mexico until their case was adjudicated. But under Biden the wall was hated, no end of jokes were made of Trump and the wall right up until Biden and the lying corrupt Left finally decided the wall was a great idea. Then they jumped on it. Did I mention hypocrisy being the mainstay of the Left along with lies and corruption? Rather than work with Mexico to house these asylum seekers, Biden simply gave them a court date for years in the future and expects these freeloaders to actually show up. Hell, why should they make an appearance when they will never be found anyway. They are here to stay at yours and my expense. I wonder how many Liberals are taking these freeloaders into their homes? High priced hotels they have stayed at are ruined in many cases and the freeloaders refuse to eat the food served. Talk about an ungrateful bunch of bastards huh?

Surely you can agree those European NATO nations should have been made to pay their fair share of NATO costs can't you? You don't like what Trump says but then again what has ANY other politician in America said about NATO paying its fair share? NOTHING I know of. At least Trump speaks up with a set of balls and insists America not be screwed over time and again. What is worse to you, America getting screwed or Trump speaking up on behalf of America? Why should America foot the bill for everything else going on in the world? When wars break out it is America who pays not only in cash but also in there blood of our troops when in many cases we have nothing to do with the problems of some other country. Take Ukraine for example. I am all for supporting Ukraine in its fight with the Russian take over. But when does it end. It seems every month it is America doling out Billions of dollars to protect Ukraine even though reports show the Ukrainian politicians are using our Billions of dollars to buy lavish automobiles, buy gold and property in other countries. I have read where our Billions are used to pay for pension plans of Ukraine workers. Shouldn't someone with a brain, that would not be POS Biden, demand some accounting of those Billions of dollars? Shouldn't there be someone with the BALLS to say NO? But there isn't. We just keep paying out Billions even when our own national security is threatened as when Biden told the world we don't have artillery ammunition for our own needs if we are attacked or have to go to war. We pay to support the Ukrainian border but what of our own border? Wouldn't it be nice if America had a border just as does every other country on the planet?

We need all the friends we can get, you tell us. All too true and I agree. But friendship goes both ways doesn't it? Maybe some of these other countries can try befriending America for a change. Maybe the UN could start doing its job? Didn't there used to be a UN force that would go into countries like Ukraine to help for that country's freedom from Russian invasion. Isn't there something the UN could do to force Russia to back off and get out of Ukraine? Must everything on the planet be left to America to solve?

You tell us you don't like Trump. Sometimes I don't like the things he says. But take a good look at the lying corrupt Left. Is there anything at all you like from that side? For me there is not even one small accomplishment Biden has made for the good of America. His policies are designed to divide Americans for the good of Socialism.

Dennis
What an interesting post you submit. You say Trum... (show quote)


Dennis, you too make some interesting points, however, Trump's followup statement that he would encourage Russia to do whatever the hell they want was the most stupid and damaging statement I have ever heard come out of the mouth of a politician and that's saying a lot! While he is right to want other members of NATO to pay their fair share, this is not the way to go about it. Frankly, the Trump we saw during his Presidential Term is not the same man we see now and he has obviously now sunk to "Knee Jerk" type reactions to virtually anything that affects him rather than well thought out policies and plans. There is a big difference in having "Balls" and doing the right thing and apparently he no longer knows the difference. I now have serious doubts that he would be good for our country should he get re-elected. In any case, he will not get my vote again under any circumstances and we really need to find better candidates for both parties while there is still time to do so. Without some other options, I may just sit out this election for the first time since I was old enough to vote and I don't know if I can do that either! It would be difficult for me to vote for Biden, but if that's the only choice it's either vote for him or not vote at all.

On another note, I agree with you about the UN, they have to be the most anti-american, self serving, group of idiots that have ever existed! I don't know why we continue to patronize them. They can't seem to do anything more than a few economic sanctions and should have sent UN forces into Crimea long before the Ukrainian invasion. Letting Putin take over Crimea without a fight only emboldened him and the invasion of Ukraine is the follow up. Now we are encouraging him to invade NATO allies? Again, the most ridiculous, offensive, and damaging statement I have ever heard from any politician. I think it would be a big mistake to make Trump our Command and Chief one again regardless of his performance in his first term. Things do change and it's pretty obvious to some of us that Trump is not the same man that ran our country previously. Enough said.
Go to
Feb 15, 2024 08:35:06   #
rwoodvira wrote:
I agree with your point about we need as many friends out there that we can get. I haven't seen anyone mention that many of those countries that border Russia are above the 2%; I guess Trump would think its ok for Russia to move through those to get to the low paying states. The chart also reveals that the countries that were invaded during both World Wars are not keeping up their ends of the bargain - France, Belgium, Denmark and so on. Trump's methodology leaves much to be desired. Should they pay up, yes - but advising they'll be left wide open to Russia, again shows Trump as a bully.

That being said it seems that Trump more identifies with the dictators of Russia, China, and North Korea than the democracies; somehow I think he forgets those democracies represent our values as well. His iron fist in controlling Republican politics doesn't bode well for the rest of us if he returns to office. Some of you might forget his former chief of staff General John Kelly said of Trump: “The depths of his dishonesty is just astounding to me. The dishonesty, the transactional nature of every relationship, though it’s more pathetic than anything else. He is the most flawed person I have ever met in my life...”

In the 20th Century we were drawn into 2 wars in Europe; largely to protect our own interests. The world is getting smaller every day with faster communication; those places that were once so far away can be reached by plane in 24 hours. Post World War I, the Senate refused to allow the US into the League of Nations. There's much to be said that if we had played an active role perhaps the rise of Germany could have been tempered and countless lives and destruction could have been avoided. Those following the course to abandon the premise of NATO must also forget that the plans of Japan and Germany post the conquest of Asia and Europe was to conquer North America. Can we really allow China and Russia to go unchecked?

Lastly, Trump's comment of Nikki Haley's husband shows how little Trump values our military; Haley's husband was on duty for the National Guard. Much has been made in the past on this forum about Trump's comments regarding our sacred dead in Europe. He continues to show disdain for those who serve and in some cases have died to preserve our liberties.

Biden is clearly no prize; we really need an alternative to both.
I agree with your point about we need as many frie... (show quote)


Well said Sir, especially the last sentence!
Go to
Feb 14, 2024 15:37:34   #
btbg wrote:
You are not making any sense. If you agree with most of Trump's policy decisions it means that you disagree with Biden.
If you agree that many NATO nations are not paying their fair share then it makes sense to put pressure on them to pony up. That's how he got them to pay some of what they were supposed to pay the last time he was in office. Why on earth should we honor our commitment to them if they refuse to pay what they have promised? Treaties are supposed to be followed by all sides. Instead for years and years they have failed in their obligations and we have repeatedly bailed them out.

We currently have more than 37 trillion in national debt, why should we pay to protect countries that are not paying to defend themselves?

Are you seriously going to vote for someone who is not mentally competent and supports bad policy just because you don't like Trump's style. Nothing like cutting off your nose to spite your face. You need to seriously rethink your position.
You are not making any sense. If you agree with mo... (show quote)


While I do indeed agree that all NATO countries should pay and do their part, Trump's statements were still way over the top and there are better ways to address this problem rather than telling the entire world that we will not back our obligations to our NATO allies, especially that he would encourage Russia to do "whatever the hell they want" if they don't pay up. Trump may have been trying to make a point, but literally blew it with his over aggressive attitude and at least in my opinion he will pay a heavy price for it. If nothing else, he won't ever get my vote again and Independents like me are important if he really wants to win in November and I seriously doubt that I'm the only one that feels this way. I can only hope that Trump's only remaining competitor will somehow win the Republican nomination or the Democrats find a better candidate than Biden. I guess we will see one way or another, but this was the last straw for me and I'm done with Trump. I hope that others feel the same!
Go to
Feb 14, 2024 09:49:04   #
FredCM wrote:
Saw something yesterday about who spends what for NATO and defense. All members spend over the 2% bit on their defense. No freeloaders, that's nonsense. What's interesting is we spend 2.7% of our GNP on "defense." BUT, that includes the Pacific area too, not just Europe like everyone else. Soooo, one could argue we are the only freeloader in NATO. Ignoring that our GNP is way way higher than any others'.


Interesting, I'll look up that data as well.

Also sorry if I posted this in the wrong place. If it gets moved to the "Attic" then so be it and I'll try not to post political items in the general category in the future.
Go to
Feb 14, 2024 09:24:20   #
Longshadow wrote:
We basically have two choices:
Bad and worse...


Yeah, this doesn't leave us much of a choice!
Go to
Feb 14, 2024 08:56:21   #
First off, I'm a registered Independent that voted for Trump both times. I thought he did a great job while in office and we agreed on most policies and politics. However, I did feel that he got a bit crazy after losing the second election and I really have never cared for his self centered, self serving personality. Anyway, after recent events, I am done with him. His recent statements that he would not protect our NATO allies that didn't pay their part was way over the top! He even went so far as to say that he would encourage Russia to do "Whatever the Hell they want!" While I do agree that our NATO allies need to take a more active role and meet their obligations, this is not the way to approach that situation and this pretty much alienates our allies to the point of a possible end to NATO. At the very least it severely weakens it going forward, especially if he gets re-elected. Frankly, we need all the friends we can get, especially in Europe and the Middle east and an end for NATO would mean losing some very strategic bases and allies over there as well as embolden Putin's Russia. Geese, we are close enough to WWIII as it is and this man does not need to be our Commander and Chief again! He will under no circumstance get my vote again and I sincerely hope that others feel the same.
Go to
Jan 21, 2024 08:52:00   #
Really nice photos of a species that was once plentiful in these parts (Northern Kentucky). Unfortunately, they are pretty much gone around here, mostly due to loss of habitat, but probably other reasons as well. We used to hear their calls all the time and I also was able to call them up into my backyard as a kid. I have also experienced the explosive nature of walking up on a covey in hiding and believe me, those shorts had to hit the "Biz Bag!" My Sportsman's Club used to raise and release chicks into the wild to help support their population, but they either didn't make it long term or they went elsewhere and the program has long since been abandoned. Too bad really!
Go to
Jan 16, 2024 09:12:50   #
Both
Go to
Jan 14, 2024 09:32:16   #
fourlocks wrote:
I think Bison Bud's right; Peacock must have paid the NFL a boatload of money and personally, I hope they lose their shirts over this deal. Does Peacock make its customers suffer through advertising? I could see paying a streaming service a fee for non-advertisement programming considering how network TV loads the football games with so many ads you sometimes forget what teams you're watching.


Non advertisement programming, especially for sports, might just be something I'd pay extra for, but I doubt it will ever happen. Frankly, the cable companies and streaming services having been double dipping in this area since their inception and I don't see that changing any time soon. On Air TV survives on selling commercials without subscriptions and other charges and they have been around for a long time. Frankly, the fact that they still exist proves that the sales of commercial spots are indeed the primary source of income in all of broadcasting and I doubt that they will ever move away from that scenario completely. However, times do appear to be changing!
Go to
Jan 14, 2024 08:37:13   #
Money is indeed the deciding factor here and I don't know how much money Peacock paid to have exclusive rights to the game, but I'd bet it was a heck of a lot! In any case, I hope they didn't make enough for it to be very profitable! If they want to stream the game in addition to normal network coverage, I have no issue, but to exclusively stream the game is cheating a lot of fans out of watching and lower viewership will directly reduce the price paid by advertisers for their commercial spots, which is the classic way to make money in broadcasting. Frankly, I'd love to see the numbers, both on cost verses profit and whether the total viewership was down or not, but I guess we will just have to wait and see if this exclusive streaming thing turns into the norm for sporting events. Personally, I will do without, unless it stays on "Free TV."
Go to
Jan 13, 2024 16:43:20   #
I just found out that the Chiefs playoff game tonight will only be available via streaming Peacock. I gotta say that this really makes me mad, as I don't have Peacock and don't even have a way to stream it on my big screen tv even if I did sign up for it. Frankly, I see this as a move toward having to pay to watch all sports and hope they have a very poor response and that others are upset about this as well. It was bad enough that the Thursday night games were restricted, but everyone should get to see the playoff games and they make plenty of money putting them on network TV. Is this really the future of sports on TV?
Go to
Jan 1, 2024 10:03:25   #
Longshadow wrote:
I noticed also.
Because it's under $20.
Psychologically that makes a difference, like only $.63 a day.


I guess that it could be just a marketing ploy, where psychologically being less than $20.00 is similar to all the $.99 pricing out there, but it still seems a bit odd to me for virtually all of them to use this same number. Anyway, that's as good an answer as any I can think of, thanks for kicking in!
Go to
Jan 1, 2024 09:11:52   #
Has anyone else noticed that most all of the charity sites that advertise on TV for donations are asking for "$19.00 per month?" This is true from organizations like Wounded Warriors, The ASPCA, St. Jude's and Shriner's Hospitals, and many others. I have no problem with this, but do wonder what the significance of that particular amount might be. There must be some sort of tax advantage or something and I am wondering if anyone here might know the real reason behind this donation request amount. Not a big deal, just something I noticed.
Go to
Dec 30, 2023 09:16:46   #
Well, the popular consensus is that Windows 11 is the way to go and after reading all the input here I now agree and wish to thank those that contributed here. I guess I could wait for Windows 12, but I've never been one that jumps onto the newest software and/or technology and since Windows 11 will be supported for a good while I think it will do just fine. On another note, my old Windows 7 machine will not be abandoned any time soon as there is software on it that I use frequently and until I move to newer software on the new machine, which could take a while, it will still be useful. I also currently use a Chromebook for all my internet activities and have had far fewer problems with it than I did using Windows anything! However, this new laptop will access the internet and that is particularly why I feel I'm ready for an upgrade. Good luck and Happy Holidays to all.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 57 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.