Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: hollis
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Mar 18, 2018 21:28:45   #
Leon S wrote:
The 24-85 has less distortion because of the smaller range. Both are great lenses for walk arounds. Obviously weight becomes a factor after carrying it for a while. The older you get the more important less weight becomes. I don't think you can go wrong with either lens as a walk around.


Thanks Leon S
Go to
Mar 18, 2018 21:27:27   #
ELNikkor wrote:
24-120. if you think you might be in a low light situation, a 50 f1.8 or 35 prime would be small and not so expensive. (I always carry one around but seldom use it)


Thanks ElNikkor - your suggestion is useful; it'd just I don't want to carry around two lens
Go to
Mar 18, 2018 21:25:27   #
Roy G Biv wrote:
Definitely the 24-120. I have the D750 and the 24-120 is my walk-around and travel lens, even though I also have the 24-70 2.8 and other lenses. The 24-120 is small enough and the extra reach is worthwhile. Additionally, the constant f/4 aperture is a plus.

You seem "focused" (pun intended) on the extra stop of the 24-85. You don't mention if you plan on shooting in low light but would ask if you need the extra stop. I don't miss it on the 24-120 for travel but if needed, you could choose slower shutter speed or play with ISO to achieve close to same.

I previously had the Nikon D600 as my first FF camera and loved it. Good Luck!
Definitely the 24-120. I have the D750 and the 24... (show quote)


Thanks Roy G - I plan to use the lens indoor and outdoor and possibly in some low light situations; as you have suggested I can compensate for the light with lowering the shutter speed.
Go to
Mar 18, 2018 21:20:13   #
Trustforce wrote:
Hollis--
We're going on a Baltic cruise this summer and I bought the D850 and the 24-120 mm lens because I wanted a full frame sensor with a good single lens to walk around. I've been very pleased with the photos that this combo produces. For now, the 24-120 is the only FX lens I have (I've got some non auto focus primes and zooms from my days as a Nikon F3 film user that can be used on the new dslr as they have the auto index ring so the D850 can know the lens aperture), and the 24-120 is the only lens I plan to take on the trip. I ruled out buying the 24-70mm based on cost, large size and weight.

Just curious, what camera body is the new lens for?
Hollis-- br We're going on a Baltic cruise this su... (show quote)


I am considering the 24-120; it's to be used on Nikon D 610. If I need to use it in low light situation I could lower the shutter speed as suggested by a few members.Thanks
Go to
Mar 16, 2018 12:22:03   #
I'm not sure what you mean, but to compensate for less light coming through the lens, you would need to slow the shutter speed so the shutter will remain open longer to allow more light in.

You are correct.
Thanks
Go to
Mar 16, 2018 12:10:29   #
Mac wrote:
Both are very good lenses and I don't think you would be disappointed with either one. The 24-85mm is slightly faster on the short end and slightly slower on the long end. In addition to having a longer reach the 24-120mm has 9 aperture blades to the 24-85mm having 7 blades. The 24-85mm is smaller and lighter than the 24-120mm.
Whatever you decide, I'm sure you will be happy with your choice. Enjoy.


Would increasing the shutter speed on the 24-120 compensate for the low light? I had made the comment earlier but still ask the question

Thanks
Go to
Mar 16, 2018 11:59:12   #
Thanks to Mac and camerapapi for your input
Go to
Mar 16, 2018 11:56:33   #
Thanks trustforce - I will consider the 24-120 and increase the shutter speed to compensate for the light situation.
Go to
Mar 16, 2018 09:37:04   #
This topic might have discussed before but I probably missed it.Going overseas to Europe in a couple of months and need an all around lens
to carry with me. My first choice is the Nikon 24-70 f2.8 but because of economic reason have decided to give some consideration to Nikon 24-85
or Nikon 24-120. Any thought/suggestions would be useful to help me make a decision. Thanks in advance.
Go to
Jan 30, 2018 15:46:31   #
To fellow UHHG Members. - I have a Nikon D 610 in New condition with all accessories that I am selling. Any member interested can contact me rin296@yahoo.com.

Asking Price $1125.00
Thanks
Ray


















Go to
Jan 27, 2018 10:51:07   #
Thanks RKL349 for your input
Go to
Jan 26, 2018 19:50:43   #
I wonder how sharp a contrast is the 24-70 compared to the 24-120. Cost aside I might consider that path
Go to
Jan 26, 2018 19:45:18   #
Thanks Gene51; Manglesphoto; Goofynewfie; and Trustforce. Trustforce your idea is what I gaining my attention because I don't want to be switching lens. Moreover, I am also thinking about the weight.
Go to
Jan 26, 2018 14:56:28   #
I am told that it is 1lb less in weight which would make it manageable
Go to
Jan 26, 2018 14:35:04   #
Hello fellow UHH members. I had a Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR Lens that I purchased to use on my D610 Camera and sold it because it was too heavy to carry around. I am now looking at the 24-120 F/4 lens as a replacement. I am aware that the 24-120 is not as fast as the 24-70; I am thinking that I could increase the ASA to fill in some of the void in regards to light. Any opinion suggestions is appreciated. I am going overseas to Europe in a couple of months. Many thanks in advance
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.