Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: melueth
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 28 next>>
Oct 11, 2021 07:14:46   #
alexol wrote:
Some time ago, I received some excellent guidance on basic settings for the RX10.

Long story short, the camera is back to it's defaults and I have no idea where I got the excellent settings advice from. Should have saved them - definitely will next time!

Would appreciate any recommendations, please.


This user has written several free, downloadable "books" on the RX10iv with settings that essentially make it into a point and shoot. The link here is a PDF file, and is for nature and bird in flight shots. I found some of it to be very useful. He likes to work with JPEG, but all the setting combinations i found work fine with RAW.

https://psnp.info/psnp_/?p=1525

Marylea


(Download)
Go to
Oct 9, 2021 09:26:59   #
I have friends living in Shafsbury, just north of Bennington. They're telling me that there was a fungus on the leaves in that region this year due to a lot of rain, and a lot of the leaves have fallen prematurely. There is some color happening there, but it's just not as lush as some years. They run a bed and breakfast, and are sending their guests north of them to catch better foliage shots. Just what i learned yesterday.

Marylea
Go to
Sep 16, 2021 06:24:39   #
Gene51 wrote:
I use one "rule" that works for every image. Never overexpose any important highlights. I am not talking about rim light when you are shooting a subject that is backlit, or specular highlight reflections on water. But if you are shooting a bride in a white dress, next to a white wedding cake and the groom dressed in a black tux, make sure you expose the cake and the dress correctly.

Your camera's meter is immensely helpful, especially if you use it's spot meter function.

In the above example, I would point the spot meter at the white dress, and use a camera setting that adds 2 stops (or more if your camera has more highlight "headroom") more exposure. This would allow the most amount of exposure without losing the details/texture in the dress and the cake.

This would be the opposite of what I would do with a hand held spot meter used with negative black and white film. I would find the darkest feature that I wanted to retain detail in, and adjust the meter's suggested exposure settings for two to three stops less light. This would ensure that my shadows would not be completely black. Manipulating developer temperature, concentration and "time in the soup" would help reveal the shadows (thin areas on the negative), while suppressing the development of the highlights, for a more balanced negative.

This works for any scenario. Post processing can always reveal shadows, but overexposed highlights are typically unrecoverable.

In addition to the spot meter, you have two more tools - the overexposed highlight indicator, or "blinkies" which will reveal areas that are overexposed as blinking, and the image's histogram. Keep in mind that if you are recording images as raw files (highly recommended for maximizing the dynamic range of an image) these two tools use the camera-generated preview, which is based on a jpeg version of the image, and will have narrower dynamic range. When you look at the histogram of the image in your processing program, if you maximized your exposure based on the in camera histogram/blinkies you'll find that you might have been able to use a little more exposure without risking overexposed highlights.

Hope this helps.
I use one "rule" that works for every im... (show quote)


Excellent info - thanks!

Marylea
Go to
Aug 14, 2021 09:06:58   #
Wow, wow, wow!! Amazing!
Go to
Aug 11, 2021 05:57:51   #
DickC wrote:
Wow!! Great photo!!


Thank you!!
Go to
Aug 10, 2021 06:11:13   #
You don't mention the type of housing that surrounds this drive. I recently had a Western Digital external hard drive (MyBook) "crash" and discovered that the typical problem with these devices is the SATA bridge used to connect them to power and your computer. Once that's removed and you place it in a drive dock, you may find that your actual hard drive is perfectly fine, as i did. Just a thought.
Go to
Jul 29, 2021 06:46:20   #
alberio wrote:
Beautiful images of everything in motion.


Thanks very much!
Go to
Jul 29, 2021 06:45:35   #
RWCRNC wrote:


Go to
Jul 29, 2021 06:45:08   #
yssirk123 wrote:


Go to
Jul 28, 2021 06:51:09   #
J-SPEIGHT wrote:
Beautiful image


Thank you!
Go to
Jul 28, 2021 06:50:46   #
SonnyE wrote:
Beautiful Marlea!

I think the cars added some nice light painting with the trees, and roadway.


Thanks SonnyE! I liked those streaks too!

Marylea
Go to
Jul 27, 2021 10:07:11   #
BassmanBruce wrote:


Thanks Bruce! You helped me out learning about this a few years ago.

Marylea
Go to
Jul 27, 2021 10:06:12   #
PixelStan77 wrote:
Great job Marylea. Thanks for sharing natures beauty.Stan
Did you sleep in?


Thanks, Stan! I did sleep in!! 😂
Go to
Jul 27, 2021 09:31:09   #
I managed to stay awake long enough one night last month in Vermont to capture this. This was the merging of 64 shots; 23 second exposures at ISO 500 on my Rokinon 12mm/Sony A6500. The yellow flecks at the bottom are the firebugs that shared the space with me. I thought the cars going by on the road behind the barn would ruin the pic, but i kind of like what they added. Overall fun shoot!

Marylea


(Download)
Go to
Jul 24, 2021 08:46:01   #
I bought the HX99 this spring but returned it because i just didn't care for the overall image quality. I got a few nice shots out of it, but they were all pretty close up. Zoomed out (which was a feature that definitely drew me to this camera), the images were always blurry and/or grainy. Also, it did very poorly in low light settings. Finally, for me . . . it was just too small. I found it difficult to navigate due to it's tiny size. I ended up with the much larger (and more expensive) Sony RX10M4 and couldn't be happier.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 28 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.