jerryc41 wrote:
Naturally, I have one of those. It comes in very handy.
Quite magical when I bought one many decades ago as a mechanic!
martinshap wrote:
My new Tamron 100-400 changes the shutter speed and compensatory ISO when I zoom out.
the shutter speed might go from say 100th at the short end to 500 at the long. the camera must be set to ISO auto and aperture priority. This happens only with my Sony 7r iv and not my Sony6500. It also does not happen with the 2 other Tamron zooms and Sony zooms. If I set another ISO or use shutter or manual priority I am fine. It is almost as if it is compensating for the longer focal length by boosting the speed. I cannot find anything about this in my books or on line . So anyone what gives?
My new Tamron 100-400 changes the shutter speed an... (
show quote)
Is the lens a fixed Aperture, or variable? Variable Aperture telephoto lenses reduce the Aperture at the longer ends, which would require an increase in ISO or a reduction of shutter speed to compensate.
A fixed Aperture lens would not require the drastic changes as you zoom.
Pistnbroke wrote:
Well looking for something to do in this Covid/no wedding senario . Anybody tried it ?
I tried posting to Dreamtime sometime back - very picky as to what gets approved/accepted. Be prepared to submit lots of images, adhere to their requirements concerning copyrighted material, or perhaps potential copyrighted material, noise & artifact levels, and keyword extensively.
If you get lots accepted, you may make a little money, but it may be too much work for the payback.
ChackbayGuy wrote:
Took 30 minutes of tracking, after hearing him this morning, AND had to shoot nearly into the sun. However, did get a few shots of our local pileated woodpecker. He was in a tall pine tree across the road from my house.
Was trying to use spot metering, probably a mistake, as all were handheld using my D500 with a Sigma 100-400mm fully extended (I'm 77 and not as steady as in previous years). Also grabbed one shot of a couple vultures circling above the cypress trees in the back of my house. Was nice to be out in the sun.
Took 30 minutes of tracking, after hearing him thi... (
show quote)
They are tough little buggers to get shots of!
edrobinsonjr wrote:
I always upload from my cameras to my pc with a cable and it takes no time at all.
I have used a card reader a couple of times and it was no faster.
Not to get too technical, BUT, cameras use pretty much USB 1 or 2...computers today can have USB 3.0 or 3.1.
There is a tremendous speed difference between USB 1 & 2 and USB 3.x
Depending on what you are downloading there will be a huge difference between 500 41 MB raw files vs 500 6 MB JPG files when using a USB connected camera vs doing the same with a USB 3.x card reader.
I have been transferring images by use of a card reader for many years now, shoot only raw, and will say, yes, the card reader option is definitely faster, way faster.
petego4it wrote:
Don, also, I've used an Apple cinema display happily as a second screen with TB...until recently when it too inexplicably sadly stopped working, perhaps after a recent Apple software update.
Uncool! I would be a little upset if an update did that to me!
ecobin wrote:
I was at Conowingo Dam on Thursday and the activity there has picked up (compared to that in September when I was there last). Here are a few shots - all taken with Nikon D850, Nikon 500pf and a Marumi CPL filter. All were taken on a tripod with gimbal head.
Nice catches!
Have not been to Conowingo for a few years now - looks good.
petego4it wrote:
Don, you're right and not right. Apple was embarrassed that TB, tho fast, didn't work reliably. They re-did it to Thunderbolt 2 which was better but still gave out inexplicably after a time. Thunderbolt 3 is actually as I understand it reconfigured USB3 as you say, with different connectors that won't work with my Thunderbolt 2 boxes. At least so I was told. So I was advised a year ago to get a "new" iMac off Apple's rebuilt but guaranteed as new list that still had the TB 2 connections. So that's what I have. It's interesting that the TB has worked reliably for you. I've heard of other horror stories. I suppose the fault could be with the Lacie drives as takes 2 to tango! You don't say but were you able to keep your old TB1 or 2 HDs to work with the TB3?
Don, you're right and not right. Apple was embarra... (
show quote)
I can say from my years using TB1 & 2 I have not seen any issues. I have a mix of TB and USB 3.0 drives connected 24x7 and do not see any problems.
You can also get a Tb3->TB2 adapter so your TB 2 devices can still connect to a TB3 port. $49.00 on Amazon, Apple or other sites.
https://www.amazon.com/Apple-Thunderbolt-USB-C-Adapter/dp/B01MQ26QIY - I ordered one of these to accompany my new iMac as I want my 2nd display over TB to continue as well as my TB1 & 2 drive docks.
FWIW - I use a WD Duo drive that connects via TB1, a OWC dual sata dock that connects TB2 holding a pair of sata SSD's and an old 27" imac used as a second display connected via TB2, but the old imac is TB1. My TM disk is in a Mediasonic probox that holds 4 drives and connects USB 3
All my images are stored on the WD Duo drive with the most current 3 years worth on the OWC dock on SSD. The other SSD in the OWC dock is my start up disk.
My reasoning for the 2020 imac was the faster internal PCie ssd, and an 8GB vram card... of course a few more cores can't hurt either ;)
Edit: Just ran across this article about Apple and TB on new apple silicon....
https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2020/7/8/21317980/apple-silicon-intel-thunderbolt-arm-macs-support-usb-c
petego4it wrote:
Thanks for the detailed reply Don. I too have an iMac now with a very large capacity external Lacie 12TB drive. However the Thunderbolt connection is not reliable so back ups and interface too doesn't happen at times. The drives do have a USB back up access fortunately but it is very, very slow. Apple has now discontinued Thunderbolt as a result of such access problems. Plus in all honesty, some sloppiness by the operator and need to incrementally increase the size for photo files has contributed in duplicates being filed.
Thanks for the detailed reply Don. I too have an i... (
show quote)
I know that Apple discontinued the Thunderbolt Display - but Thunderbolt ports are still alive and well on current models of iMacs. I recently ordered a 2020 iMac and it comes with 2 Thunderbolt 3 ports in USB-C style connectors.
Perhaps the Thunderbolt ports will go away after Apple replaces INTEL chips soon.
BTW - I have yet to have an issue with Thunderbolt on my iMacs. I have been using TB2 on my current iMac for connection to external SSD's and SATA drives, and TB1 on my old iMac as a second screen.
gmbrandon wrote:
I always shoot raw with my Nikon D5500. Sometimes after some processing in Lightroom most of the raw files will maintain the "filename-xxx.NEF" file name. However some of the files start showing up as "filename-xxx.NEF+JPEG". This is within a group of photos all taken at the same time without changing settings in the camera. When I look at the metadata, it shows the filename without the +JPEG extension but lists as Sidecar Files "xmp,jpg". Could it be because that particular file has been exported as a "jpg"? Can anyone give me any explanation for this? It does not seem to make any difference as to sort order, processing or anything else, I am just curious. Thanks in advance for any insight given.
I always shoot raw with my Nikon D5500. Sometimes... (
show quote)
I have shot raw with several Nikons over the years, the last 2.5 using a Canon - I shoot raw 100% of the time. I have used Lightroom since 2014. I export as JPG when needed, all files are converted to DNG on import from NEF, CR2 or CR3. I do not store JPG's unless they are originals from my devices.
All my flicker posting of course are JPG's exported thru Lightroom.
I have never run across an issue as decsribed.
jerryc41 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=install+two+SSDs+in+laptop
Looked at the first one...that ASUS had a built in nvme drive plus a built in sata and hard drive bay...the adapter being used is a nvme to sata converter. Btw - converting nvme to sata may also reduce the speed quite a bit.
Many old Dell’s used the CD/DVD/ floppy drive bay to allow a 2nd hard disk to be installed, again, already room inside and a connector inside the laptop.
The videos that show installing a 2nd ssd into a pc are pretty much dependent again on drive bay space and connectivity, but much easier than squeezing something into a full laptop.
jerryc41 wrote:
Good point, but I got the idea from a couple of online projects that put two drives into a laptop.
Perhaps a really old laptop might have room for a standard size drive for that adapter, but it would be like one of the first laptops made probably.
Last hard drive in an old laptop I had was more like a credit card size with connector pins built in that fit tightly into a slot.