I was watch the tube - one of the channel news networks and I noticed that most of the photographers have large, and fairly long lenses, but they are all clamoring to get closer to the subject. Are thedy using telephoto lenses, or something else? Why?
It depicts order vs. chaos, the pawns are purposefully aligned poor beggars, whereas the rich and powerful obey no law (Trump)
Why should I be gentle because yer old? age means you've done more, you've experienced the barbs and roses of criticism, you should be tough enuff to consider comments without the sugar coating that hides the truth. When asked why are the chessmen in the wrong positions just say cause that's where I put em. they look better there. and if you actually have a reason for the arrangement Then I guess that you f**d up, cause the meaning escapes me. Anyway I like it.
“What i like about photographs is that they capture a moment that’s gone forever, impossible to reproduce.”
― Karl Lagerfeld
Linda from Maine - It depicts order vs. chaos, the pawns are purposefully aligned poor beggars, whereas the rich and powerful obey no law (Trump)
New Orleans, city of above ground burials, misty streets lined by live oaks dripping Spanish moss, voodoo and jazz...but what is this building? Near Jackson Square I took the picture, can anyone identify the structure?
Looks like this could be a purple gallinule or an American coot. The color of the feathers appear to be purple, but it has an all white beak which is a property of the American coot. The two are closely related = tossup
I know this is more a bird question than a photo, but I thought I'd see if anyone here can help ID this before I have to open an account at Audubon. I think this is a Muscovy Duck, except it doesn't look like it has webbed feet. I have seen photos of Muscovy's that have webbed feet and the skin on its face does not appear to be red, but that may be the photo. Can anyone help? This one was in a rescue center in south FL.
wilsondl2 wrote:
When you just snap and then review you get all snaps and very few good shots. 10% is worse than terrible! If you stop and think and compose and set your camera for the best settings you can get good shots most of the time and great shots often. - Dave
“Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.” – Ansel Adams
,Poor old Ansel, twelve ain't even 10%. I guess he just didn't know how to compose and set his camera :O)
bobmcculloch wrote:
MY vote, Paint Shop Pro, easy to use does most everything, relatively intuitive.
I use both affinity and PSP. I like affinity's style a bit more than PSP, but i have used Corel's Suite forsolong, there are things that i haven't figured out yet in affinity. They are both relatively cheap compared to PS and you don't have to subscribe to them.
Longshadow wrote:
A few seconds "review" now set, that might not have been set before?
The answer! the 8th row of Camera Settings 2 in Menu is Auto review was set to 2 sec, select 4th option none.
I bought a Sony rx 10 iv recently . My Nikon bodies and especially large lenses were getting to be too much to handle. I have parkinsons disease and not having to change lenses makes it a lot easier. However the last couple of times I've used it shutter clicks and the display shows it but it takes a few seconds before the display is active again. During that time you ccan't take any photos. Anyone have an idea what I may have messed up?YOU LOAD THE PIX AND THEY COME OUT FINE.
A pleasant afternoon spent driving through an Amish community. And getting a few photos too...
the original had a sort of yellowish sky, I copied the woodpecker, defringed it to get rid of the purple fringe and pasted it into a better sky, but I still have alight border around it. using Affinity, latest version. Can anyone help?