imagemeister wrote:
Does this have anything to do with the real world ??
This is not necessarily what anyone would do for a real world photo. As stated, the compression / quality slider was biased towards compression. If you are saving changes biased towards quality, it would take a lot more saves to make a noticeable difference in the image.
If you are taking a small web image, and making changes to it, you might notice these effects after saving.
Some image samples, trying to show the effects of jpeg compression.
For reference, the original picture CSX-2287~1 was exported from Lightroom, from the camera raw image.
I did several generations of save as jpg using ACDSee 20 set with a compression / quality 25% biased toward compression.
This is a case of trying to force the effects using a small number of saves. The image was not edited between versions.
The car is the first Shelby Cobra Daytona Coupe CSX-2287, located at the Simeone museum in Philadelphia.
First export from Lightroom
(
Download)
After 3 saves at 25%
(
Download)
After 10 saves definite blocking and smearing
(
Download)
Many of the photo editing programs allow you to save the file with a varying degree of lossy compression. If you save files with higher quality settings, the degradation of the image is minimal. But if you specify lower quality, degradation of the image will be visible fairly quickly.
Test it yourself, take an image, save it as a number 2, at a lower quality setting, then open the number 2, and save it as number 3, etc.
It won't take long to see a difference
Costco is a Nikon Authorized Dealer. They do not sell Gray Market. They are able to get special promotions from suppliers because of volume.
Nikon has certainly added confusion with the 70-300mm lens choices.
1. FX, AF, No VR, cheap
2. FX, AF-S, VR
3. DX, AF-P, no VR, to include in kits
4. DX, AF-P, VR
5. FX, AF-P, VR
#1 requires a focus motor in the camera
#2 will work with all digital cameras.
#3,4,&5 may not be fully compatible, even with firmware updates
Read carefully before you spend your money.
It means that at 70mm, and at 210mm, the widest aperture is f4. Compared to the 70-300 f4.5-5.6 lens, where the widest aperture varies as the focal length changes
Pensacola is the home. El Centro is the winter home away from home. Formerly from Pensacola and Now in NJ, I miss seeing the team regularly.
I think that a wired headset was needed for an antenna for this usage.
Nikon sells Camera Control Pro. There are also third party products like CamRanger. I don't know if they work with a D3100, though.
The 18-300mm lens cannot be used with any Nikon teleconverter. Third party units may work with it.
This started for me a little while ago on Chrome, on an Android device.
After clearing data, and clearing cached data, it hasn't been an issue.
Series E 135mm F/2.8 Might be a good choice.
Phone software wants a WiFi connection to pass through to the Internet. If it doesn't, then the phone disconnects.
Some roms have the ability to disable that test, or go back to mobile data.
Good luck with it
Spider223 wrote:
Maybe there is something weird with WMU and the D5600. Works as advertised on my D5500.
The D5600 uses the new snapbridge technology and programs, blending Bluetooth and WiFi.
The D5500 D7200 and the D5300 use WMU, and Wi-Fi only.
The D5200 requires an adapter to use WiFi.
So yes, there is a difference.
Looks good, clearly shows the change in depth of field based on aperture change.