Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: ocbeyer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 41 next>>
Sep 29, 2013 09:05:54   #
This site presents the best explanation I have found on the subject, clear and concise with excellent visuals:


http://www.gizmag.com/camera-sensor-size-guide/26684/
Go to
Sep 27, 2013 06:46:29   #
Make sure you are there for sunrise or sunset. Amazingly dramatic colors and light.
Go to
Sep 25, 2013 10:12:02   #
Of course you can always give pseudo-HDR a try. Export 3 to 5 versions of the same picture as a TIFF, each one at a different exposure value, and then merge them in something like Photomatix. This won't give you all the range that five actual shots will but if you shoot a little underexposed anyway (as I like to do) there usually is plenty of information in the image to make it work. And you don't have to worry about ghosting. I also like to check and adjust if necessary the highlights and noise levels on each image before I export.
Go to
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Sep 25, 2013 09:55:05   #
I like this idea, I like that it is narrowly specific, as compared to the earlier contests (prior to the last two). It forces you to be creative. And it would (hopefully) squelch needles arguments i.e. what is youth? what is an insect? etc etc etc...

Good job.
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 23:44:16   #
magicray wrote:
Any B&W photograph of a naked lady is art.


:thumbup:
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 23:36:05   #
jenny wrote:
Oh dear,ocbeyer, and I think they gain "merit" only because of being such startling history and reproduced time and time again until they take on their own lives,just as the quotation,"eye of the beholder", is attempting to explain away everything as some final statement. Then ....
WHOSE eye? That of a 5 yr. old? a "retardo"? a serial killer? Should there be some minimum definition of what an eye might be that is somewhat qualified to make a statement because of intelligence? education? experience and exposure to ooooooops!....art? Oh, I give up and push "unwatch",this thread will drive us all up the wall. hahaha
Oh dear,ocbeyer, and I think they gain "merit... (show quote)


But that's my point. The creation of art is not always as premeditated as the OP would suggest nor can anyone really say what art is or what it is not. Even serial killers are capable of artistic appretiation. Whatevever makes you think, smile, laugh of cry. And it is their artistic merit that causes these iconic photos to be reproduced time and again so that they take on lives of their own.
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 23:09:25   #
[quote=jenny]But were those art? Or merely history. (Which winds up here making little sense but was supposed to be response to those events such as Hindenburg crash or war pics.)[/qumerit

Why would visual recordings of history be excluded as art? I get your point but half of the historical works of art out there are ahistorical so is it veracity that disqualifies historical photos as art? Besides, I think many of these pictures are historical only because of their artistic merit.
Go to
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Sep 23, 2013 23:01:36   #
sirlensalot wrote:
Interesting- I always viewed them as part of photojournalism, or event photography as you described, but I think art would be an appropriate description as well. History, danger, panic, chaos, death, are all contained within the borders of the images. Perhaps more art than event shots. I would be okay with either or both. Thoughtful choices.


:thumbup:
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 23:00:31   #
winterrose wrote:
But are they examples of art or excellent event photography?


If the image evokes emotion it is art, whether the medium is oil, clay, film,digital or finger paint. Hence the importance of the beholder's eye.
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 17:16:25   #
Hmm This thread has gotten long and this may have been said already, but some times great (artistic?) photos are just a matter of being in the right place at the right time with camera in hand and knowing how to use it. I'm reminded of some of the iconic shots of the 20th century - the Hindenburg disaster, the crying Frenchman during World War II, General Nguyen Ngoc Loan shooting that handcuffed prisoner in Viet Ham.
Go to
Sep 13, 2013 06:35:32   #
I've had very good luck with Wasabi and almost as much with Digipower, not much luck with the no-name brands. But nothing works like my OEM batteries, both Oly and Canon. They are expensive but they are better.
Go to
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 11, 2013 06:25:07   #
OnDSnap wrote:
Wet roads,lights on, early or late on overcast day with ominous clouds looming...on a twisty road, cliff side.



:thumbup:

And a polarizing filter, for windscreens and tire black.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 06:21:38   #
Bill MN wrote:
Found a good way to photograph birds or other wildlife. I mounted my gimbals on 10 lb. cast iron weights from exercise lifting machines. Size is 5x10X1” high. They make a very stable base for on the counter, in the blind or on a sturdy table by a window in the house. Even on a table on the patio. On the bottom near the corners I put small felt pads so I can slide them around without making scratches. The wooden base I cut about 10” from a 2x8. This one is lighter to take to the parks and set on a picnic table. I can take pictures of birds, airplanes and flying saucers. I don’t need vibration reduction on a gimbal.
Found a good way to photograph birds or other wild... (show quote)


Very cool. :thumbup:
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 06:19:36   #
Shooting with my 70-300 (Oly) I find that the sweet spot is close to f/8, never zoomed fully out or in, and when hand holding, even with IS on, a shutter speed at least as high as the focal length, preferably over 1/500 sec. My camera also has a second IS feature for panning, which helps with this shooting situation. But if the shutter speed is high enough I find that really isn't necessary.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 06:06:42   #
EstherP wrote:
Yes, it's a handful allright, $1400. If you really want it, though, buy before December 2, and you'll be able to get either the flash or the lens adapter thrown in for free.
http://cache.olympusamerica.com/static/getolympus/rebate_forms/51344_E-M1_Rebate_US.pdf

I wonder if Oly cameras are actually easier to use than Canon or Nikon - I see many fewer questions about the use of the camera itself than for those two brands. Maybe that's why UHH gave you the impression you're the only one:-))
EstherP
Once these cameras hit the stores here, I'm planning to go have a look, hoping they'll unpack one and let me hold it. Although I have had the E-5 for less than 3 years now and can't justify upgrading already.
I am glad that Olympus is apparently coming back after the embezzlement fiasco, but not too happy that it seems they are abandoning the 4/3 line. Although there were rumours earlier this year that an E-7 was in the works. We'll see.
Yes, it's a handful allright, $1400. If you really... (show quote)


There are a handful of us out there. As for the cost, I think my E-3 was going for $1600 new in 2008 or 2009. And, DP review thinks this IS the new E-7. I hope they are wrong.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 41 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.