Yes it did ,the first looked like some one in the. Gay pride parade. Mind you I never seen one live ,only on tv

75 mm. I ment as last word , got cought up in the show

The 35mm would be the same as the fifty on your camera , you don't want 50mm on d3200 , the full frame you do , there both called Normal lens because it's about what your eye sees with out looking through any camera so a 50 mm on your is like having
A

Key word here , one person's take on the subject, we all have different views , and trying to cuppy hole it to what is right and what is wrong , is like trying to clam you know how every thing should appear to the world's eye , you can't control nature ,nature controls
You , a banker is no better than a garbage man ,it's only how humans have been taught to perceive a difference, a dog or any other anamal is the only thing who sees it for what it is , not what you want to be , there is no right or wrong way to make or take a photo

As far as I can see there is nothing earth shateringin in any of these . Any one with a camera can take these all day long
And they do .I do also . It takes a lot of work to make a wotthy picture out of every day stuff you find in a park . The time of day
And light is. One the key things, ,and this isent it . I dont know what you can do . Just keep taking a lot of pic, and find some park
shots in library books, and note the difference.

No I did not say that , I said if I took the shot and did not like it , it's gone , i dont care what it is or who took it .if it popped up
In a book I was browsing, I would flip the page page in the time I said , but if it was a original in my hands worth money .
Well I'm not stupid, there have been pictures in mags that I have looked at for at least 30 or more minuites then came back
To them and looked again. And one that I could look at for a hour at a time, it had so much going for it I was mesmerized evertime I looked at it ,

And if I spent 3 to five seconds looking at each one , I would not call it a keeper. And if I spent ten seconds looking at each one
That would be two keepers , any thing that I take the three seconds get tossed out and if I keep a five second one ,I have to know
The people . And never able to get another shot of them ,that goes for snaps and any thing else I take ,set up. What ever ?

Define well executed, and can't the two ever be judged as equals in a photo contest. To me a snap shot is just about anything
That Karsh never took , and just about every thing that Jerry Winnograd took .

That is equivalent of saying the same of the camera , as it plays a small part. Or legs and feet with out them you most likely
Would be in a different spot , that could be good or bad ,

Not so. Composition content can be the most pile of crap you ever want to see , then in another shape and form it can be a winning photograph, I have seen them , pavement water sunlight pebbles fog sky , the content is nothing ,tell it gets to be a
Composition

I would agree, unless your a camera man shooting films like Laurence Of Arabia, after all what did all the great photographer's
Of the past know about the teck end of things , they knew what there limited box could do , and how to develop, and the main
Thing is they had a eye. Which I may never acquire. I have the camera part down , should , after over ,with over 50 years of playing
With it .still waitin to develop the eye . Im cooking more than normal now with the new insta pot. Got some shots of baby back ribs that taste better than they look , and the two minuite eggs are perfectly done

That $100 would be a hundered or more saved ,rather than going to any place other than the refurbishsures, that are not recommended by the camera maker , or have a ticket to that effect.

Could be that I was born and raised in a different country , how many can you write and speak in ,

Just Google Thom Hogan , he is the garu of Nikon , you will find the answer in his site

Not me , l am just quoting the people who write the results of there testing this sort of thing , and they seem to find that the
Top end cameras especially the full frame sensor , just preform with the top end lenses better than they do with a lens that
Cost say $1200, and the top end one of same focal length cost $2400 , and there is a difference how many bought a new D800
And still does not own a lens that cost over a $1000. A good example is that Nikon wide angle that cost $1900, the one that you
Can't fit a filter on its bulbes head for protection . You can really see the difference in that lens on a D800 and a $1200 . A lot
Of people do not even think along that line of thought. But it's there and if your a pixel paper you would buy the top lens .
Other wise it's a waste of time and effort. The people who are really into it buy the German and Swiss lens for $3000 or $4000
A pop for the D800.And higher end camera's.