Peterff wrote:
CIPA is very useful data, but the geography specific data for Japan, the rest of Asia, Europe, and the Americas show different market behaviors. Also, some companies seem to be bucking some of the trends. It's a little more complicated than simple conclusions reveal. Even the lens data which is a substantial part of the market for some vendors, doesn't reveal the full picture. Looking at company reports in combination will add another dimension to the comparison for those that have time to do that work. Either way, the market is in transition, but it's also important to look at the consumer demographics. Smart phone users looking to "upgrade" would likely go mirrorless. Much of the UHH demographic is going to mirrorless for other reasons, but it is an aging population composed of retirees, 'crinklies and crumblies' that are experiencing difficulty with heavier equipment. If looked at the system level combined with a representative consumer demographic it is still hard to predict, and especially so at a vendor level.
http://www.canonrumors.com/the-final-camera-shipment-numbers-for-2017-are-in/
http://www.canonnews.com/the-2017-cipa-results-are-in
http://www.canonnews.com/canon-fiscal-year-end-for-2017-strong-corporate-gains
CIPA is very useful data, but the geography specif... (
show quote)
Yes, Cipa stats are interesting. But what is missing is also interesting. Many new companies in the camera market are not Cipa members and even some old ones. Leica and Samyang probably the best known companies not part of Cipa.