I thought we already went through this. The missing zero year (the calendar jumps from 1 BCE to 1 CE or, if you prefer, from 1 BC to 1 AD) was an arbitrary point selected by Dionysius Exiguus in the year 525. As the Wiki points out in the article on Anno Domini:
Quote:
"However, nowhere in his exposition of his table does Dionysius relate his epoch to any other dating system, whether consulate, Olympiad, year of the world, or regnal year of Augustus; much less does he explain or justify the underlying date."
As I said, picked at random. From the same Wiki:
Quote:
Thus Dionysius implied that Jesus' Incarnation occurred 525 years earlier, without stating the specific year during which his birth or conception occurred.
Effectively, Dionysius threw a dart at the Julian calendar and picked the year the dart hit as the starting date for his tables defining the date of Easter.
You seem to place a lot of significance in all this. Why?