Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: GoofyNewfie
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 1067 next>>
Feb 17, 2022 22:59:16   #
https://petapixel.com/2022/02/15/getty-details-its-remote-2022-winter-olympics-photo-editing-team/?fbclid=IwAR2UrYzzSIx5V6UmgTm3aYSFIt4kK_TmL53R1MvUQ3WOB6tZbVwE0pGR3Qw
Go to
Feb 15, 2022 16:15:39   #
The AC power supply for the Godox/Flashpoint 600 here
https://www.adorama.com/fpppx600ac.html

I have one of the 600’s and love it.
The battery lasts a long time for what I do.
Higher volume at higher power will of course change your mileage.
Also have the smaller AD 200 and a couple of their speedlights.
Never have had any issues with any of them
Go to
Feb 8, 2022 22:49:28   #
tde47 wrote:
Sorry, new to UHH. I am struggling to attach a photo to this text. I copied about 15,000 slides using this setup. The essentials are a Dx Nikon camera, 40mm f2.8 Macro lens, Nikon slide holder and a speedlight. I could photograph, upload and edit 100 slides in about 75 minutes.


check here for instructions to post photos:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/help/how_to_post_a_picture.jsp

Would love to see your setup.
Go to
Feb 7, 2022 10:59:09   #
Karen:
The Nikon D-800 and grip is a very good deal.
Low shutter count, looks clean, rubber still intact.
I still use one professionally.
Works better than my 810 for one of my older sigma lenses.
I don’t shoot birds, so don’t know how it will work for that.
Be ready for bigger files.
Go to
Feb 3, 2022 17:50:58   #
jaymatt wrote:
Does anyone know how to edit a title after posting? It seems that I can edit text or photos, but not the title--is there a way?


Look above your name on this post.
You’ll see “Edit Title” for about an hour after posting.
That option goes away after about an hour
Go to
Feb 3, 2022 09:15:12   #
kcooke wrote:
Please let me know if is still available. I want to buy it


Looks like it has sold.
Optic is a newbie in the classified area.
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-727602-1.html
Go to
Feb 2, 2022 21:54:55   #
hrblaine wrote:


I'm an available light photographer, never used a flash, doubt if I ever will. Harry


I shoot available light too.
I have about 8 lights that are available to me.
It depends on what, where and why you’re shooting.
In the last 10 years, I think I’ve only used a pop-up flash to control remote speedlights before I totally switched to radio.
Go to
Feb 2, 2022 08:34:10   #
Spirit Vision Photography wrote:
Look up the story behind him photographing Winston Churchill.

Look up my post on page 2 of this thread.
It’s there.
Go to
Feb 1, 2022 17:22:24   #
Daniel E wrote:
Greetings,

A local group has purchased a billboard along a major highway and wants to use one of my photos on it. Quite an honor, but my first reaction is no way...enlarging a 6000x4000 pixel image that much would surely pixelate or otherwise ruin it completely. So how are some billboards displaying fairly sharp images? Thanks in advance for any advice on this.


Look at "How Many Megapixels Do You Need to Print a Billboard?" from Fstoppers
https://fstoppers.com/originals/how-many-megapixels-do-you-need-print-billboard-220239

(spoiler alert: generally not really any more than for a 4x6 inch print.)
Go to
Feb 1, 2022 13:10:29   #
rmalarz wrote:
I've admired Karsh's work since the first portrait of his I'd seen. The lighting and his ability to capture the personality of the subject were incredible. I think his working in black and white aided that capture or personality.
--Bob


Me too. Loved his work.
https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2017/06/12/yousuf-karsh-bust-unveiled-in-downtown-ottawa/

Dikdik wrote:
I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that he came to fame as a result of a photo he took of a government official/leader.

Like...maybe....Winston Churchill?
Anyone hear of how the famous photo of Winston Churchill happened?

“ It was one of the most famous portraits ever made. Some say it is the most reproduced image in history. It was on the cover of LIFE magazine when WWII ended. The photo was taken by one of the most famous portrait photographers, Yousef Karsh–known as Karsh of Ottawa–on 30 December, 1941, after Churchill gave a speech to Canadian House of Commons in Ottawa. [On the 60th anniversary of that famous speech, Canada honored Karsh and Churchill with a commemorative stamp featuring above photo.]

Karsh was hired by the Canadian government to do this portrait and knew he would have very little time to make the picture. He began by researching Churchill, taking notes on all of the prime minister’s habits, quirks, attitudes and tendencies. When he finally got Churchill seated in the chair, with lights blazing, Churchill snapped “You have two minutes. And that’s it, two minutes.” The truth was that Churchill was angry that he had not been told he was to be photographed; he lit a fresh cigar and puffed mischievously.

Karsh asked Churchill to remove the cigar in his mouth, but Churchill refused. Karsh walked up to Churchill supposedly to get a light level and casually pulled the signature cigar from the lips of Churchill and walked back toward his camera. As he walked he clicked his camera remote, capturing the ‘determined’ look on Churchill’s face, which was in fact a reflection of his indignantcy. Karsh recounted: “I stepped toward him and without premeditation, but ever so respectfully, I said, ‘Forgive me, Sir’ and plucked the cigar out of his mouth. By the time I got back to my camera, he looked so belligerent he could have devoured me. It was at that instant I took the photograph. The silence was deafening. Then Mr Churchill, smiling benignly, said, ‘You may take another one.’ He walked toward me, shook my hand and said, ‘You can even make a roaring lion stand still to be photographed.'”

The next photo Karsh took, where Churchill was smiling, was less memorable:”

"The Roaring Lion"


Tribute in Ottawa

(Download)
Go to
Jan 29, 2022 17:42:49   #
BboH wrote:
First - many thanks to those who put the name to what I couldn't recall - Kelvin.
Second - I quite agree that that the X-Rite will be more precise than the visual comparison that I use. However, my method does quite well for me - on my LCD, my computer screen adn the times that pront using Canonb's Pro9000- given that I've shot a "good" red and made a good comparison. Will it stand up to your eye, Bob and others ??? but works for me.


If it works for you, that’s great.
I only use my ColorChecker software for when I need accurate color, like when shooting artwork. It’s not for everyone. For other things, I want pleasing color. Pleasing and accurate may be two different things. Cheers!
Go to
Jan 29, 2022 11:14:53   #
imagemeister wrote:
Holding a camera at waist level and the use of a leaf shutter, stationary mirror, and normal focal length lens contributes to the Rolleiflexs' renowned sharpness also !


True, but the fact that it’s a medium format which doesn’t require as much enlargement as 35mm to get to a similar size print is probably the biggest benefit.
Never owned a Rollei, but I have had several medium format cameras.
I miss shooting with them.
Go to
Jan 27, 2022 21:13:27   #
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/626991/overexposed-history-fotomat?fbclid=IwAR1TohCgaYVmVFi6dO5AgqnZ19ilc2NhZJER7eAPNqIPRPf3UKnVKo0fWWU
Go to
Jan 27, 2022 18:57:22   #
Yep. Been using it for years.
Gene51 posts about it a lot.
It goes beyond just white balance.
It adjusts all the colors to a standard.
Great for shooting art.
Canon, Nikon, Sony colors will have no bias.
Go to
Jan 26, 2022 00:25:15   #
butchsphoto wrote:
Perfect shape I used it for only back yard wildlife. Has battery but no charger $225 or $250 w/charger delivered


Nice looking! Fair price for a great camera.
But my friend now says she wants something with wifi.
Thanks!
Good luck selling.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 1067 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.