CHG_CANON wrote:
I try to include / retain the original image number in all versions of the file during the LR import and / or export presets. The number, say 1234, might occur a few times in searching the catalog for this value in the file name as the counter rolls over, but never more than a few images that don't overwhelm my ability to eye-ball the one I'm looking for. I can add a metadata date filter if I really need to isolate further.
This is similar to the method I use. For example I have a RAW image, call it IMG_7674.CR2. When I convert it to JPG I rename it IMG_7674 Tom, Irene.JPG. Works for me.
Glad you survived the gator!
Thanks for all of your advice.
I went ahead and got the second body. It has a lower shutter release count and came with two batteries. Glad to have it!!
I remember that there is a web site where one can upload camera information to help protect against loss or theft. I mostly buy used equipment and just bought the Canon 80D body that everyone in my previous message suggested that I buy.
I know there is such a site because I have used it but now I can't locate it.
I am a rank amateur photographer and I take quite a lot of photos (around 1,500 to 2,000 per month). I am the de facto photographer for several music events in my area. (Note: I am frugal in not taking a lot of shots of the same thing.)
My current dilemma is this.
I am completely reliant on my Canon 80D, for which I have several nice lenses and I have been jonesing for a second 80D body and I found a great deal for a used one. The struggle is whether to pull the trigger on my retirement budget. (I can come up with the cash.)
It would mostly be a backup but would also occasionally be used for quick lens changes at various venues.
So, while I can come up with the cash, I am unsure whether I should.
I am sure that some of you here have found yourselves in a similar situation and my question to you is; how important is it to have a backup camera body in a situation such as I have described?
And, yes, I know, ultimately I have to make this decision. I am purely looking for advice from the experienced peeps here.
All the best and I love UHH.
. I just need to save this, that's why I'm replying.
Or, you could try Affinity Photo. It's inexpensive and works like a champ.
It looks like vest buttons to me; I wouldn't worry too much about that.
Affinity Photo is great and inexpensive.
Try https://www.fakespot.com/. Great for checking the validity of Amazon reviews.
Does the new NIK Collection work well with Affinity Photo?
I have a Canon 80D and upgraded the 18-135 mm lens to the Nano version for cheap on Craigslist and am glad I did for using the power zoom modual for video. If she's not into video forget what I said.
Yep, did the reduction and got the same error.
Here goes again... greatly reduced in size.
Nope got the same error. The reduced image is JPG at 4.8MB.
It's over 20 MG and RAW. You say to upload it unedited. Hmmm... doesn't seem that that is possible.