Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: green
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 1179 next>>
Sep 12, 2017 10:19:27   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Careful, your Stupidity is showing. There is so much more than point & press the shutter button to taking images. That point & press applies only to snapshots.... To think otherwise is flawed thinking.
Just because you don't agree with my post, you attempt to denigrate it. I say the same thing anytime anyone asks a "Best" question, no matter the forum. The response applies across all subjects.

sorry, I kind of set you up with that, and while we both know there is a lot of skill involved in mastering photography today, the Brownie camera, which was introduced at the beginning of the 20th century, brought photography to the masses, much like the Apple brought desktop publishing to the masses... so it does have a special place among the "best" cameras.

...enjoy your day, Scott.
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 10:12:40   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Got sources for your employment claims instead of just throwing figures out? How about a link to where that graph came from instead of just attaching it.
why... I have sourced these numbers previously, the graph is available from any number of sources, all using the government's dataset... Sources will not convince you... I could tell you that cats and windows are the biggest killers of birds... but not a peep from bird lovers until it was found that some windmill designs kill some birds..

http://www.sibleyguides.com/wp-content/uploads/Bird_mortality_chart.jpg

http://www.cal-epower.com/uploads/6/2/4/4/62448599/_4683803.jpg
these kind kill zero birds
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 10:06:39   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Just because you don't agree with my post, you attempt to denigrate it. I say the same thing anytime anyone asks a "Best" question, no matter the forum. The response applies across all subjects. For instance, when asked about the "best" camera, if there was a "best", everyone would have it & the world would be an extremely boring place. BTW, I, at least, post regularly in the photographic forums. I don't relegate my posts to the "attic" only.

well good, you are definitely better than me, if not the very best...

...and speaking of cameras and "the very best"... photographic technology reached it's zenith with Eastman Kodak Brownie Instamatic...been more and more complicated and downhill since then until now, the camera takes it's very own picture, the "photographer" only presses a button and aims it.
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 09:59:15   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Cheaper ? I don't think so. Plus the reduction of jobs is staggering. Ever wonder where we get those Solar panels? How about China. Supporting their economy while tearing down ours? Not to mention the thousands of birds that Solar & windmill farms kill...Yes, coal isn't the best source, but the "Green" substitutes aren't ready for prime time yet. My vote is for a multitude of energy sources. There are places where the Sun doesn't shine enough or the wind isn't powerful enough that reduce their effectiveness & thus other sources are needed. As for the "deniers", there are those on the other side of the equation that are just as guilty of spreading lies & misinformation but you do not condemn them. Why not?
Cheaper ? I don't think so. Plus the reduction of ... (show quote)
reduction in jobs, staggering? More people work at Arby's than in the coal industry. Coal workers want their children to be anything but coal workers... do you wonder why?

...3 times as many people work in the solar industry as the coal industry... one is booming, one is dying... can you guess which one is which?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4e/US_Monthly_Solar_Power_Generation.svg/330px-US_Monthly_Solar_Power_Generation.svg.png

Scott, you are comparing a mature 100-year old industry that receives $5B/year in subsidies for the last 100 years with a fledgling industry, that has been getting $0.4B/year in subsidies since 2009.
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 09:50:20   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
"Best" is subjective. What one considers "Best" others may not. Stupid post...You quote that poll, but you don't say that the same poll gave HRC & the Democrats an even lower rating than Trump...Plus, we don't know the sample questions the poll used nor the makeup of the sample pool, both of which can influence outcomes.
nice trumpsplainin... the last shall be first and the worst shall be best!
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 09:47:13   #
yes you silly nut, she did say those actual words...

phcaan wrote:
And you don't remember Nancy Pelosi saying " We need to pass it to see what's in it?
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2010/03/09/pelosi-pass-health-reform-so-you-can-find-out-whats-in-it


http://www.snopes.com/pelosi-healthcare-pass-the-bill-to-see-what-is-in-it/

Imagine an economy where people could follow their aspirations, where they could be entrepreneurial, where they could take risks professionally because personally their families [sic] health care needs are being met. Where they could be self-employed or start a business, not be job-locked in a job because they have health care there, and if they went out on their own it would be unaffordable to them, but especially true, if someone has a child with a pre-existing condition. So when we pass our bill, never again will people be denied coverage because they have a pre-existing condition.

We have to do this in partnership, and I wanted to bring [you] up to date on where we see it from here. The final health care legislation that will soon be passed by Congress will deliver successful reform at the local level. It will offer paid for investments that will improve health care services and coverage for millions more Americans. It will make significant investments in innovation, prevention, wellness and offer robust support for public health infrastructure. It will dramatically expand investments into community health centers. That means a dramatic expansion in the number of patients community health centers can see and ultimately healthier communities. Our bill will significantly reduce uncompensated care for hospitals.

You’ve heard about the controversies within the bill, the process about the bill, one or the other. But I don’t know if you have heard that it is legislation for the future, not just about health care for America, but about a healthier America, where preventive care is not something that you have to pay a deductible for or out of pocket. Prevention, prevention, prevention–it’s about diet, not diabetes. It’s going to be very, very exciting.

But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 09:44:49   #
boberic wrote:
short answer to why they didn't go for single payer in the firstplace. They knew it would not pass. Do yoy really want the US federal government to control your health care. In EVERY country with single payer- it works well for well patient care and for minor illnesses. But it breaks down when it comes to treatment for serious disease and for diagnostic modalities and for serious surgical procedures. These things are very expensive, and are severely deficient in gov't, run systems. The US is a world leader in medical research of allkinds. If we were to go to a single payer all that research would come to a screeching halt. You want to destroy the medical delivery system in the country go to a single (government)payer system.
short answer to why they didn't go for single paye... (show quote)


short answer: medicare works great, less filling!
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 01:39:15   #
dirtpusher wrote:
You just said you weren't. Repukes are noway for the working man


Go to
Sep 11, 2017 23:27:12   #
#8 Stay indoors during severe shark warnings.

https://ewedit.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/sharknado.jpg?w=620&h=408&crop=1
Go to
Sep 11, 2017 23:24:11   #
idaholover wrote:
Bannon looks like he could hold his own in a bar fight! And, most men aren't handsome.
you like the rugged type?
Go to
Sep 11, 2017 23:22:49   #
at this point, what does it matter?
Go to
Sep 11, 2017 23:22:11   #
you have to be extremely careful then, if you are looking for anything resembling reality. A winger needs to know both sides, both sides. You not only need to be able to lay out the winger arguments, but also what the other side's wingers are going to counter with... read both sides, both sides...whatever the opposing articles have in common, may be the somewhat truthful portion.

and call me green, Green was my father.
Go to
Sep 11, 2017 23:14:07   #
DaveO wrote:
...but Obummer did it....
or bill
Go to
Sep 11, 2017 23:09:20   #
mwalsh wrote:
A bit ironic given Phil's statement in the just prior post: "You have no idea what I think, unless you are psychic of course."

Yet he knows what others think and what their agenda is...
yes, irony


Go to
Sep 11, 2017 15:35:49   #
thom w wrote:
cit-i-zen





[sit-uh-zuh n, -suh n]

Spell Syllables

Examples
Word Origin

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com


noun
1.
a native or naturalized member of a state or nation who owes allegiance to its government and is entitled to its protection (distinguished from alien ).

2.
an inhabitant of a city or town, especially one entitled to its privileges or franchises.

3.
an inhabitant, or denizen:
The deer is a citizen of our woods.

4.
a civilian, as distinguished from a soldier, police officer, etc.

Apparently the word has varied meanings. I wouldn't stroke out over it.
cit-i-zen br br br br br br sit-uh-zuh n... (show quote)




Idaholover was out in the wilds the other days, shooting some of Idaho's forest citizens.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 1179 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.