dougbev3 wrote:
I have several Nikon cameras and lenses. I have been looking at getting a medium format camera just to see if I would like it better. My question is …. For those who have, would you do it again? Is it that much better?
Advantages:
* more than twice the resolution of 35 mm
(even at smallest frame size, 6 x 4.5 in. = 56 x 41.5 mm, area is 2.7 times that of 36 x 24 mm frame)
* therefore, can make bigger enlargements (or stand closer)
* choice of up to 8 frame sizes (depending on the camera)
* can contact print a decent-sized image
* less diffraction at small apertures (f/22 is sharp. f/32 is usable)
* therefore,better for pinhole photography (than 35 mm)
* convenience of roll film
* convenience of daylight tank
Disadvantages:
* Cost per exposure
* Use more developer, fixer, etc.
* Lenes larger in diameter an therefore more expensive, heavier
* Larger and heavier camera
* To make enlargements requires a big enlarger
* Roll film forces you to use the same development
time for entire roll
* Fewer choices of camera make/model
* Fewer film choices
I would say it's worth it if:
* You plan to make enlargements bigger than 8 x 10"
* You like making contact prints (or don't own an enlarger)
* You want more depth-of-field (without excessive diffraction)
* You are bored with 36 x 24 mm aspect ratio