Texas Cops Are REALLY Smart!
Sep 8, 2018 13:59:42 #
I'm still interested to hear what happened betweent the time he opened the door and the time she shot. That's the period of time that we know nothing about.
Sep 8, 2018 14:02:20 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
SteveR wrote:
I'm still interested to hear what happened betweent the time he opened the door and the time she shot. That's the period of time that we know nothing about.
Give time for facts to come out. It will be dealt with in the appropriate legal manner. We don’t need instant facts. Investigate first.
Sep 8, 2018 14:13:18 #
Get the boy a seat on the Kavanaugh hearings. Ol Shit Shooter will fit right in.
Sep 8, 2018 14:19:27 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Well, you have gone and made an ass of yourself. F... (show quote)
My bad for assuming you are a libtard. I'll try to remember that the next time you post something foolish. That said you are the real ass for convicting this officer before any of the circumstances were publicly known. I never claimed to know what they were so don't get your panties in a wad about that. My dad was a cop and later judge so I learned early on to never assume anything before all the facts are known as you did with your "she shouldn't get off as she was negligent.... Boot her off the force & put her in jail..." comment. Opinions are OK. Public convictions before all the information and circumstances surrounding the situation are known should be tempered with facts; a skill that is, as I said earlier, beyond your comprehension.
Sep 8, 2018 14:29:38 #
Calsnap wrote:
Get the boy a seat on the Kavanaugh hearings. Ol Shit Shooter will fit right in.
Cal better take another nap before you're in over your head!!! LoL
SS
Sep 8, 2018 14:30:50 #
Sep 8, 2018 14:34:32 #
SteveR wrote:
I'm still interested to hear what happened betweent the time he opened the door and the time she shot. That's the period of time that we know nothing about.
Steve, that's pretty simple, she pulled the trigger because she happened to have a gun(cops do), then the bullet flew through the air and probably hit the guy in the chest!!??
What happened outside of that we'll probably never know, since there is only one living witness!!!
That was a fine, "honey, I'm home!!!"...., No???
SS
Sep 8, 2018 14:43:12 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Steve, that's pretty simple, she pulled the trigger because she happened to have a gun(cops do), then the bullet flew through the air and probably hit the guy in the chest!!??
What happened outside of that we'll probably never know, since there is only one living witness!!!
That was a fine, "honey, I'm home!!!"...., No???
SS
What happened outside of that we'll probably never know, since there is only one living witness!!!
That was a fine, "honey, I'm home!!!"...., No???
SS
So, he opened the door and he shot? I'd like a little more information than that. As it is, things look pretty bleak for the officer. You never know when that crazy twist will jump up. BTW....Cal's post was funny as heck.
Sep 8, 2018 15:20:18 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
NIce job at changing the subject when you know you look stupid. Two years and so far not one shred of Trump / Russia collusion. How long do you whiny babies think you can keep screaming Russia?
When was Trump interviewed? Are you familiar with how many of his associates have been charged/pled guilty/been found to be guilty in court/have or are serving time? The most important ppl are left until the last and as far as I know, Mueller is investigating those around Roger Stone now. Please let us know if you are aware of anything more recent since you seem to know everything...and nothing.
Sep 8, 2018 15:22:28 #
FrumCA wrote:
My bad for assuming you are a libtard. I'll try to... (show quote)
Our eldest son is a lawyer, my wife has 3 cousins that are lawyers plus one cousin who is a retired Federal Judge.... Facts are still against her. Seeing as it wasn't even her apartment, that alone raises all sorts of questions. I am a believer in having all the facts before passing judgment, but when overwhelming evidence points to a lapse in judgment, it's hard to ignore them.
Sep 8, 2018 15:26:52 #
dljen wrote:
When was Trump interviewed? Are you familiar with how many of his associates have been charged/pled guilty/been found to be guilty in court/have or are serving time? The most important ppl are left until the last and as far as I know, Mueller is investigating those around Roger Stone now. Please let us know if you are aware of anything more recent since you seem to know everything...and nothing.
Funny, those that have been charged/pled guilty/been found guilty have not been over collusion, which was the original reason for the special prosecutor. Normally, they are never assigned unless evidence of a crime has been committed. These "crimes" were never known beforehand. Seems, in this case, HRC should have a special prosecutor assigned to her as well.
Sep 8, 2018 15:29:28 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
dljen wrote:
When was Trump interviewed? Are you familiar with how many of his associates have been charged/pled guilty/been found to be guilty in court/have or are serving time? The most important ppl are left until the last and as far as I know, Mueller is investigating those around Roger Stone now. Please let us know if you are aware of anything more recent since you seem to know everything...and nothing.
You are making my point. It has been made crystal clear that anyone Mueller nailed had to do with the individual and there was no connection to Trump. None. They know Trump or worked for him but the so called crimes did not include Trump. Everyone has had Trump under a microscope, and still nothing. I am willing to wait for Mueller to release his findings. I believe he will not find any Trump / Russia collusion.
Sep 8, 2018 15:45:39 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Funny, those that have been charged/pled guilty/been found guilty have not been over collusion, which was the original reason for the special prosecutor. Normally, they are never assigned unless evidence of a crime has been committed. These "crimes" were never known beforehand. Seems, in this case, HRC should have a special prosecutor assigned to her as well.
The evidence of a crime was that another country interfered in our election, I believe that has been shown. We just are unaware how far up it goes, Mueller's panel doesn't leak.
Sep 8, 2018 15:49:29 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
You are making my point. It has been made crystal clear that anyone Mueller nailed had to do with the individual and there was no connection to Trump. None. They know Trump or worked for him but the so called crimes did not include Trump. Everyone has had Trump under a microscope, and still nothing. I am willing to wait for Mueller to release his findings. I believe he will not find any Trump / Russia collusion.
No, I am not making your point. You have no idea what Mueller's panel knows. NONE. His panel doesn't leak. I'm sure he doesn't need Trump's testimony because he has the documents but he wants to give Trump a chance at answering the questions. Trump is such a prolific liar that he couldn't stand up to any reputable lawyer. Unless Mueller will not charge him because of being in office, I'm fairly sure they have Trump on tax evasion, money laundering and RICO charges.
Sep 8, 2018 15:50:48 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Our eldest son is a lawyer, my wife has 3 cousins that are lawyers plus one cousin who is a retired Federal Judge.... Facts are still against her. Seeing as it wasn't even her apartment, that alone raises all sorts of questions. I am a believer in having all the facts before passing judgment, but when overwhelming evidence points to a lapse in judgment, it's hard to ignore them.
I agree with you. I, too, am a believer in having all facts before passing judgment. Facts that were unknown or at least not published when you posted your OP is what prompted my comment(s). Those facts are now revealed. This incident most definitely reveals a lack in judgment on the part of the police officer.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.