How did they do that.
May 5, 2018 08:53:54 #
Picasso light painting a centaur in 1944
I am familiar with basic light painting, but how did they do this without a blurry Picasso waving light around in the background? Film days too.
I am familiar with basic light painting, but how did they do this without a blurry Picasso waving light around in the background? Film days too.
May 5, 2018 09:11:41 #
Maybe super long exposure and for the last 10 seconds he stayed still?
May 5, 2018 09:16:08 #
The light on him was off when he was "painting" then the strobe was triggered..or the strobe first, then the light painting.
Make little difference in this case.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2109060/Hypnotic-photographs-capture-Pablo-Picasso-painting-light.html
Make little difference in this case.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2109060/Hypnotic-photographs-capture-Pablo-Picasso-painting-light.html
May 5, 2018 09:17:04 #
Two possibilities:
f/22 or smaller, in the dark with rear curtain sync.
He drew the “light painting” on the processed negative. He was sneaky that way.
f/22 or smaller, in the dark with rear curtain sync.
He drew the “light painting” on the processed negative. He was sneaky that way.
May 5, 2018 09:18:21 #
May 5, 2018 09:18:37 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
the light on him was off when he was "painting" then it flashed.
Flash! I didn't even think of that. Duh.
Thanks
May 5, 2018 09:18:48 #
It could be a long exposure in the dark with the light being waved around, followed by a quick flash exposure to get the man and background.
May 5, 2018 09:25:49 #
May 5, 2018 09:28:06 #
Really helps to read previous posts......
My link above tells how it’s done.
My link above tells how it’s done.
May 5, 2018 09:38:47 #
melismus
Loc: Chesapeake Bay Country
The shadowed region of his chest is darker than the background. The background could not have been exposed when he was not in place.
May 5, 2018 10:34:36 #
Everything was totally black and the aperture open while the light stick was being was casting it image on the film. At the last moment the flash lit up Picasso and included him in the scene.
May 5, 2018 11:01:22 #
Yes, I saw that after I posted my reply, thanks.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Really helps to read previous posts......
My link above tells how it’s done.
My link above tells how it’s done.
May 5, 2018 12:14:25 #
melismus
Loc: Chesapeake Bay Country
If that were the case, the light parts of the scene would be showing through the dark region of his chest.
SteveR wrote:
Everything was totally black and the aperture open while the light stick was being was casting it image on the film. At the last moment the flash lit up Picasso and included him in the scene.
May 5, 2018 16:00:56 #
repleo wrote:
Picasso light painting a centaur in 1944
I am familiar with basic light painting, but how did they do this without a blurry Picasso waving light around in the background? Film days too.
I am familiar with basic light painting, but how did they do this without a blurry Picasso waving light around in the background? Film days too.
Looks like a really long exposure for the light painting, followed by a flash burst from an off camera flash, maybe even manually fired, at the end of the exposure. Ten to 15 secs ought to do it.
May 5, 2018 17:35:44 #
Picasso was a magician!
It’s just an illusion.
If you close your right eye and use just your left eye and the one in the back of your head, it will be pretty obvious! Try it!!!
SS
It’s just an illusion.
If you close your right eye and use just your left eye and the one in the back of your head, it will be pretty obvious! Try it!!!
SS
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.