You never asked me that question, but I will answer it anyway: I am sure that Mueller knows a hell of a lot more than either of us do. I have not accused Trump of criminal activity, and I have said all along that i will wait for the Mueller report.

So everything you know about Alinsky you learned here in the Attic? Having read the book, I can tell you that most of the brain farts about it posted here are either flat out wrong or taken wildly out of context. So at least you admit your ignorance and sloth when you admit to not having read the book even though you refer to it as if you had.

So if you want to be snide, or try to attribute things to me that I have never said, you should know what the f**k you are talking about before you post.

thom please, just this once, pay attention. Maybe we can this one time reach a conclusion of some sort that is amicable to both. SS posted that Mueller KNOWS Trump is guilty of collusion with Russia and that is why Trump won the election. Are you with me so far? He stated that Mueller KNOWS, not thinks, not is working toward that end of Trump being guilty, but that Mueller KNOWS Trump is guilty. As we ALL know the investigation is not over yet and nobody KNOWS anything, whether there really was collusion nor even if colluding with Russia was in fact any crime at all. Nobody knows. That is what I told SS.

So here you come telling me that Mueller hasn't reached any conclusions. I had already said that same thing long ago so why on earth are you telling me this as if I had taken a side opposite yours. In other posts a few days/weeks ago I said the same thing, I was willing to wait to see what the outcome was. Please catch up. I have already spoken for myself quite a few times.

Are we on the same page now? Do you feel better telling me what I had already posted to SS?


Please tell me and the world once again how it is me who does not pay attention.

Dennis

Forgive my ignorance but what the hell are you talking about? I have never referred to you at all in a bad light that I can think of. We have pretty much gotten along so why are you accusing me of doing anything to you? Ignorance and sloth??? Sloth??? How can I refer to the book as if I had read it when I openly admit I have not read it. That is pretty good of me if true. But it is not true. You did read the book. I am happy for you. What about my reference to the book was not factual? Why would you ASSUME that everything I know about Alinsky I read here in the Attic? I don't think I have ever read anything about Alinsky here in the Attic. Have you? I do have other avenues from which I get information other than the Attic. Don't we all?

One more time I am not being snide and have never attributed anything to you at all, EVER. With respect maybe it is you who should know what the fuck you are talking about.

Dennis

Oh, there’s a real plausible solution alright but I’m sure it’s not comprehensible to you or any NRA carrying brain washed gun totter!
“A well regulated militia” was solved with a standing army centuries ago. Face it, city folk like yourself are NEVER gonna be needed to bear arms against this government..., we’ll, maybe TRAMPS REGIME!!!
We went from no laws at all to the second amendment and there’s been regulation every day since.
How many more thousands of school kids have to die, or gang bangers will kill innocent bystanders just to be initiated in, before the NRA is shamed out of existance?
The day is not that long off when congress will know enough is enough and the only proper place to store a gun safely will be in a museum!!!
I hope the Florida kids keep shaming republicans or maybe we’ll have to wait till they’re in congress, but it’s coming!!! LoL
SS

Dennis; you are wasting your breath arguing with these people. You will never convince them that guns are not the problem here! You know, it's kind of sad in the fact that I never heard one child from that Florida shooting that even hinted to the possible cause of these shooting by other kids, is bullying. That gun didn't just jump off the rack and start shooting, it had a human user and everyone is just missing that fact. I have not heard of one NRA member involved illegal shooting of another human being. Not one! It's just easier for them to go after the guns, cause guns don't speak for themselves, it takes others to speak for them. I'll leave them with this little tidbit of information:

Dennis; you are wasting your breath arguing with these people. You will never convince them that guns are not the problem here! You know, it's kind of sad in the fact that I never heard one child from that Florida shooting that even hinted to the possible cause of these shooting by other kids, is bullying. That gun didn't just jump off the rack and start shooting, it had a human user and everyone is just missing that fact. I have not heard of one NRA member involved illegal shooting of another human being. Not one! It's just easier for them to go after the guns, cause guns don't speak for themselves, it takes others to speak for them. I'll leave them with this little tidbit of information: