Brent Rowlett wrote:
I often wish the argument of the Bill of Rights not granting the right to own an AR-15 be countered that the right to bear arms to overthrow an intrusive government if it got out of hand, meant that the citizens have the SAME arms as the government to do so. Yes back in the 1700's everyone had muskets and knives--not AR-15s. How do we counter a government out of hand with an AR-15 when the government has tanks, bazookas, and nuclear warheads? Give me a break, Libtards!
it's not the liberals but the consuckes who use that line.