Dr.Nikon wrote:
Brent .., nice shots .., glad you like your new lens ..I remember a while back you dropped a lens and had stated you wanted to buy a new one . you had boworred your sisters lens for a while but like the 100-400 L II so much better .. it’s working well for you .., can you enlighten me again as to your camera that new lens is mated to ...
Dr.Nikon, Yes, a while back I dropped my 24-105 lens and bought a used replacement right away. That drop ended up costing me $400 for the refurb lens. I never borrowed my sister's lens......you might be thinking of someone else but not me. I know Dr.Nikon that you must be a Nikon kind of guy so I hope you are not mad at me for telling you that with the 100-400 L II Canon lens I use the Canon 6D body. I know Canon and Nikon shooters often have different thoughts on which is the better camera. Personally, I have lots of Canon and Nikon friends and respect BOTH brands and know that BOTH are excellent cameras and lenses. That of course is not to say that Sony, Hasselblad, Fujifilm and a host of others are not great cameras too. The 100-400 L II Canon lens is an amazing lens. It was expensive, but I can tell that it will be worth the $$$ by the pleasure I will receive from it. The 100-400 L II Canon lens is replacing my Tamron 150-600 lens which was a very good lens at a very good price.