Shalom In The Wilderness
Jul 15, 2012 14:38:25 #
I love how you people keep bringing up "fixed" news, when every other station is, and has been "fixed" to the left. When Limbaugh started , he was the ONLY conservative voice in the media. Now your just pissed because he gets more listeners than all the commie stations combined.
I just saw a clip last week of the "unbiased" Diane Sawyer. She was introducing a story about a banker who noticed a mallard duck had hatched eggs out on a ledge in the city. The video showed the banker out on the sidewalk catching each duckling as it blinded followed their mother off the ledge. She said, "leave it to a banker to be on the look out for a "bailout"." She can't even do a simple "human interest", or "feel good" piece with out letting her leftist views get into the story.
So keep your crap to yourself about what you think is biased or unbiased media!! What you call news is nothing more than cleverly disguised propaganda. BamBam's campaign should be giving money to these "news" agencies, because they are nothing more than ads for his re-election.
I just saw a clip last week of the "unbiased" Diane Sawyer. She was introducing a story about a banker who noticed a mallard duck had hatched eggs out on a ledge in the city. The video showed the banker out on the sidewalk catching each duckling as it blinded followed their mother off the ledge. She said, "leave it to a banker to be on the look out for a "bailout"." She can't even do a simple "human interest", or "feel good" piece with out letting her leftist views get into the story.
So keep your crap to yourself about what you think is biased or unbiased media!! What you call news is nothing more than cleverly disguised propaganda. BamBam's campaign should be giving money to these "news" agencies, because they are nothing more than ads for his re-election.
Jul 15, 2012 14:52:05 #
Jul 15, 2012 16:21:14 #
PNagy wrote:
"They wanted so much to believe Barack Obama ... (show quote)
You pinpointed the problem. Obama says one thing and then does the opposite. He wants to punish the rich but he is one of the rich. He wants to punish big corporations but then he courts them for contributions to his campaign chest. He called Bush "unpatriotic" for letting the gas prices rise, but we are paying more now with out a peep from the White House. The man has demonstrated a total lack of integrity.
As far as the so-called "Bush" wars and tax-cuts go. Why is a tax-cut a bad thing? The Congress was run, both houses, entirely by the Democrats from Jan 2007 until the 2010 elections. The evil tax-cuts, wars, bail-outs, etc were all put into place by a Democratic run congress.
Jul 15, 2012 16:29:38 #
jolly1 wrote:
quote=DEBJENROB Many of you use the term socialis... (show quote)
Interesting study in failed logic, which goes as follows:
1. All forms of socialism are alike.
2. National Socialism was bad.
3. Therefore all socialism is bad.
Ergo:
1. All forms of monarchy are alike.
2. The German monarchy under the Hohenzollern Dynasty was bad.
3. All monarchy is bad. Sorry, Hungary under Stephen I; you're condemned, too.
Jul 15, 2012 16:35:43 #
jolly1 wrote:
quote=DEBJENROB Many of you use the term socialis... (show quote)
You have no idea as to what socialism is .... Hitlers, National Socialism was not a party that advocated socialism .... they used the word only .... I can understand where you would get the idea that Hitler was a socialist .... in fact ... if you want to use one of the three traditional economic types studied in secondary education .... National Socialism was closer to fascism .... please don't confuse National Socialism with economic socialism .....
Jul 15, 2012 16:37:02 #
I do not know what President Obama has done that is so bad for this country.
I'll bet all you R's are still rich and can do anything you wish to do. Your freedom has not be taken away from you at all.
Bush could bomb and kill people all over the world and kill our soliders and wound them for the rest of there life. And how much money do you think that is going to cost. Wake up.
I'll bet all you R's are still rich and can do anything you wish to do. Your freedom has not be taken away from you at all.
Bush could bomb and kill people all over the world and kill our soliders and wound them for the rest of there life. And how much money do you think that is going to cost. Wake up.
Jul 15, 2012 16:43:03 #
jolly1 wrote:
quote=pigpen I love how you people keep bringing ... (show quote)
I guess you missed the part where Diane Sawyer is a Republican and worked for Richard Nixon .... and has been active in Republican politics since college ....
Jul 15, 2012 17:05:46 #
Sneidley
Loc: Goodyear, AZ
wrr wrote:
In 2017, after four more years, you're going to look back at this statement and realize how foolish you sound, how mistaken you were and just how far astray your right-wing handlers have led you.
BigBear wrote:
He's smart. He's smart enough how to destroy a country and smart enough to get in position to.
In 2017, after four more years, you're going to look back at this statement and realize how foolish you sound, how mistaken you were and just how far astray your right-wing handlers have led you.
That's possible. I just don't want to find out you are wrong.
Jul 15, 2012 18:24:03 #
Jul 15, 2012 20:05:47 #
Yep, you're right. All socialism is bad. Look at what Obama's brand of it is doing to the United States right now.
Jul 15, 2012 20:45:14 #
"I love how you people keep bringing up "fixed" news, when every other station is, and has been "fixed" to the left..."
Your comment underscores a lesson I have failed to teach any of you, despite having repeatedly tried. Please take a look at the majority and/or controlling owners of all the most important media outlets. You will find names like General Electric, Disney, Viacom, Ruppert Murdoch. All of these are far right plutocratic corporations/individuals. Are you trying to tell me yet again with a straight face that such parties will do all they can to gain ownership of television, radio, cable, etc, only to allow some ordinary reporters to hijack the coveted property for their own editorial imperatives? With all due respect, sir, that is absolute nonsense.
Your comment underscores a lesson I have failed to teach any of you, despite having repeatedly tried. Please take a look at the majority and/or controlling owners of all the most important media outlets. You will find names like General Electric, Disney, Viacom, Ruppert Murdoch. All of these are far right plutocratic corporations/individuals. Are you trying to tell me yet again with a straight face that such parties will do all they can to gain ownership of television, radio, cable, etc, only to allow some ordinary reporters to hijack the coveted property for their own editorial imperatives? With all due respect, sir, that is absolute nonsense.
Jul 15, 2012 20:47:56 #
PNagy wrote:
"I love how you people keep bringing up "... (show quote)
Disney is right wing? You must be joking.
Jul 15, 2012 20:51:16 #
jolly1 wrote:
Yep, you're right. All socialism is bad. Look at what Obama's brand of it is doing to the United States right now.
Obama a socialist? That is right wing lunacy. Obama is a mainstream bankrolled by major corporations. His number one corporate donor in 2008 was Goldman Sachs. Would a greed, thieving right ing organization such as that give large sums of money to a politician who is betraying them? It might help if you used some reason instead of accepting conclusions handed to you by the GOP, Fixed News, and Rush Limburger.
Jul 15, 2012 21:05:51 #
PNagy wrote:
quote=jolly1 Yep, you're right. All socialism is... (show quote)
Obama is a socialist based on what he says in his books and what he speaks on the audio versions. He doesn't say "I'm a socialist", he just expresses his admiration for the socialist ideology, Che Guevara, Chairman Mau, and Hugo Chavez. He rants about making the rich pay while he is one of the rich. Standard socialist party line. In socialism only the people in power are permitted to be rich.
Even socialists need to get money from somewhere hence his numerous capitalist sponsors.
Jul 15, 2012 21:16:41 #
ted45 wrote:
quote=PNagy quote=jolly1 Yep, you're right. All... (show quote)
Thats not socialism ... thats communism your describing .... also ... think of it ... Obama wants to raise his own taxes while Bush wanted and did lower his .... can you be anymore prolatarian than that .... isn't it refreshing .... Obama wants to pay more in taxes ....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.